Advertisement

Prematurity and Low Birthweight

Clinical Behavioral Intervention
  • Eugene K. Emory
  • Tammy M. Savoie
  • Kay A. Toomey
Part of the Applied Clinical Psychology book series

Abstract

Prematurity and low birthweight (LBW) constitute frequently occurring perinatal complications with potentially risky implications. Although the terms prematurity and LBW have been around for some time, the precise meaning of these terms is often confused, giving rise to misunderstanding and inaccuracies. Historically, the terms prematurity and LBW were used interchangeably (Caputo and Mandell, 1970). These investigators were referring to a gestational age of ≤ 38 weeks or less and a birthweight of ≤ 2500 g. More recently, the term very low birthweight (VLBW) has been used to designate a birthweight of ≤ 1500 g. Using the terms prematurity and LBW synonymously leads to some confusion, since every premature infant is not LBW and every LBW infant is not premature. Owing to these discrepancies a more accurate terminology has been introduced and takes into account the relationship between gestational age and weight at birth. The new designations include small for gestational age (SGA), average for gestational age (AGA), and large for gestational age (LGA). These terms distinguish an infant within the statistically normal range for gestational age or outside the normal range. Although there are additional descriptions related to gestational age—birthweight interactions (Lubchenco, 1976), SGA, AGA, and LGA are most frequently used. The cutoff point for the SGA infant is a birthweight below the 10th percentile for its gestational age. Conversely, the cutoff point for the LGA infant is a birthweight above the 90th percentile for its gestational age. All other infants are regarded as average for gestational age, regardless of their age status. In this way, clinicians and researchers can determine whether an infants’ growth is within the expected range for its age (Fig. 1).

Keywords

Premature Infant Newborn Infant Infant Behavior Term Prematurity Narcotic Withdrawal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amiel-Tison, C. (1968). Neurological evaluations of the maturity of newborn infants. Archives of Disorders of Childhood, 43, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battaglia, F. C., & Lubchenco, L. O. (1967). A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age. Journal of Pediatrics, 71, 159–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, G. R., Sulzbacher, S. I., Kawabori, I., Stevenson, J. G., Guntheroth, W. G., & Spelman, F. A. (1980). Conditioned avoidance of hypoxemia in an infant with central hypoventilation. Behavior Research of Severe Developmental Disabilities, 1, 21–29.Google Scholar
  4. Bromwich, R. (1981). Working with parents and infants. An interactional approach. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  5. Caputo, D. V., & Mandell, W. (1970). Consequences of low birth weight. Developmental Psychology, 3, 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, S. E., Parmelee, A. H., Beckwith, L., & Sigman, M. (1986). Cognitive development in preterm infants: Birth to 8 years. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 7, 102–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Emory, E. K., & Noonan, J. R. (1984a). Fetal cardiac responding: Maturational and behavioral correlates. Developmental Psychology, 20, 354–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emory, E. K., & Noonan, J. R. (1984b). Fetal cardiac responding: A correlate of birthweight and newborn behavior. Child Development, 55, 1651–1657.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emory, E. K., & Walker, E. F. (1982). Relationship between birthweight and neonatal behavior. In L. P. Lipsett & T. M. Field (Eds.), Infant behavior and development: Perinatal risk and newborn behavior (pp. 21–31 ). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.Google Scholar
  10. Field, T. M. (1977). Effects of early separation, interactive deficits, and experimental manipulations on infant—mother face-to-face interaction. Child Development, 48, 763–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Field, T. (1979). Interaction patterns of preterm and term infants. In T. Field, A. Sostek, S. Goldberg, & H. Shuman (Eds.), Infants born at risk (pp. 333–356 ). New York: Spectrum.Google Scholar
  12. Girolami, G. (1983). In proving preterm motor control: The forgotten area of infant stimulation. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 3, 69–79.Google Scholar
  13. Lubchenco, L. O. (1976). The high-risk infant. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  14. Lubchenco, L. O., Hansman, C., & Backstrom, L. (1968). Factors influencing fetal growth. In J. H. P. Jonxis, H. K. A. Visser, & J. A. Troelstra (Eds.), Aspects of prematurity and dysmaturity (pp. 149–164). Leiden: H. E. Stenfert Kroese, N. V., and Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
  15. Manniello, R., & Farrell, P. (1977). Analysis of United States neonatal mortality statistics from 1968 to 1974 with specific reference to changing trends in major causalities. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 129, 667–674.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nelson, D., Heitman, R., & Jennings, C. (1986). Effects of tactile stimulation on premature infant weight gain. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 15, 262–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Parmelee, A. H. (1975). Neurophysiological and behavioral organization of premature infants in the first months of life. Biological Psychiatry, 10, 501–502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Scarr, S., & Williams, M. (1973). The effects of early stimulation on low birthweight infants. Child Development, 44, 94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugene K. Emory
    • 1
  • Tammy M. Savoie
    • 1
  • Kay A. Toomey
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyState University of New YorkBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations