Advertisement

The National 5 a Day for Better Health Program

  • Jerianne Heimendinger
  • Daria Chapelsky
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 401)

Abstract

The widespread enthusiasm for phytochemical research is obvious from the participation in this conference. However, the emerging research findings from this field can be confusing to consumers, who report they are frustrated with conflicting advice from the “experts.” The media’s instant coverage of new discoveries, sometimes without placing the new findings into a broader context, can have a negative impact on consumers’ motivations to change unhealthy dietary behaviors. You, as researchers, can help prevent this deleterious effect when you report your research results by referring consumers to the National Cancer Institute’s 5 A Day for Better Health Program. We do not yet know which combination of phytochemicals confers protection, but there is adequate evidence to recommend that consumers eat 5 or more daily servings of a variety of fruits and vegetables.

Keywords

Food Bank Cancer Information Service Health Foundation Food Assistance Program Industry Participant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Block G, Patterson B, and Subar A. Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr and Cancer 1992; 18 (1):1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Steinmetz KA and Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. I. epidemiology. Cancer Causes and Control 1991;2:325–357.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Steinmetz KA and Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. II. mechanisms. Cancer Causes and Control 1991;2:427–441.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ziegler RG. Vegetables, fruits, and carotenoids and the risk of cancer. Am J Clin Nutr 1991; 53:251S–259S.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ziegler RG, Subar AF, Craft NE, Ursin G, Patterson BH, and Graubard BI. Does beta-carotene explain why reduced cancer risk is associated with vegetable and fruit intake? Cancer Res 1992; 52:2060S–2066S.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Willett WC. Vitamin A and lung cancer. Nutr Reviews, 1990; 48:5, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Negri E, LaVecchia C, Franceschi S, D’Avanzo B and Parazzini F. Vegetable and fruit consumption and cancer risk. Int J Cancer, 1991; 48:350–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patterson B, personal communications (1993).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krebs-Smith S., personal communications (1994).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 1990: Home and Garden Bulletin No. 232. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA’s food guide pyramid. 1992. Home and garden bulletin 249. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    National Academy of Sciences. Diet and health, implications for reducing chronic disease risk. 1989. National Academy Press: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Subar AF, Heimendinger J, Patterson BH, Krebs-Smith SM, Pivonka E, and Kessler R. 5 A Day for Better Health: A Baseline Study of Americans’ Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. Division of Cancer Prevention and Control. National Cancer Institute: Rockville MD.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. DHHS Publication No. (PHS) 91-50212. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levy, A. and Stokes, R. 1987. Effects of a health promotion advertising campaign on sales of ready-to-eat cereals. Public Health Rep 102:398–403.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davis, R. 1988. Health education on the six-o’clock news. JAMA 259:1036–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Russo, J., Staelin, R., Nolan, C, Russell, G., and Metcalf, B. 1986. Nutrition information in the supermarket. J of Consumer Res 13:48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hammond, S. 1986. Health advertising: the credibility of organizational sources. Paper presented to International Communication Association’s Annual Meeting, Health Communication Division, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Flay, B. R. 1987. Mass media and smoking cessation: A critical review. Am J Public Health 77:153–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Farquhar, J., Maccoby, N., and Wood, P. 1977. Community education for cardiovascular disease. Lancet 1:1192–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Puska, P., Wiio, J., McAlister, A., Koskela, K., Smolander, A., Pekkola, J., and Maccoby, N. 1985. Planned use of mass media in national health promotion: The Keys to Health TV program in 1982 in Finland. Can J Public Health 76:336–42.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stern, M., Farquhar, J., Maccoby, N. and Russell, S. 1976. Results of a two-year health education campaign on dietary behavior. Circulation 54:826–833.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Puska, P., Nissinen, A., Salonen, J., and Tuomilehto, J. 1983. Ten years of the North Karelia project: results with community-based prevention of coronary heart disease. Scand J Soc Med 11:65–68.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Farquhar, J., Fortmann, S., Flora, J., Taylor, B., Haskell, W., Williams, P., Maccoby, N., and Wood, P. 1990. Effects of community-wide education on cardiovascular disease risk factors. JAMA 264:359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shea, S., and Basch, CE., 1990. A review of five major community-based cardiovascular disease prevention programs. Part II: Intervention strategies, evaluation methods, and results, Am J Health Promotion 4:279–287.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Samuels S. 1993. Project LEAN-Lessons learned from a national social marketing campaign. Public Health Reports 108:45–53.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Achterberg CL, Novak JD, Gillespie AH. Theory-driven research as a means to improve nutrition education. J Nutr Educ 1985;17:179–84.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sims LS. Nutrition education research: reaching toward the leading edge. J Am Diet Assoc 1987;87 (suppl):10–8.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Glanz K, Lewis FM, and Rimer BK (eds). Health Behavior and Health Education. Theory, Research, and Practice. 1991. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, California.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Press, New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerianne Heimendinger
    • 1
  • Daria Chapelsky
    • 1
  1. 1.National Cancer InstituteBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations