Forward and Inverse Processing in Electromagnetic NDE Using Squids
Electromagnetic NDE has been successfully applied to the detection of surface cracks and is routinely used to locate flaws in airframes, pipelines and in steel offshore oil platforms. However, there are still many problems to be solved, particularly in the aviation industry, which require the detection of deeper flaws such as corrosion in multi-layered structures and cracks around rivet holes which are obscured by the head of the rivet. Most systems use coils as detectors (though Hall probes are occasionally used), which have low sensitivity at low frequencies due to the fact that the induced voltage is proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux through the coil. Unfortunately it is necessary to use low frequencies to detect deep subsurface flaws on account of the skin-depth effect, otherwise the electromagnetic field cannot propagate down to the depth of the flaw. SQUID (Superconducting Quantum Interference Device) sensors are ideally suited to overcome the deficiencies of coils, because they are primarily detectors of magnetic flux which, together with their high sensitivity, makes the detection of deep flaws more likely. SQUIDs have been successfully used for measuring very low magnetic fields, particularly in the field of biomagnetism, and it is hoped to exploit this sensitivity to detect flaws at large stand-off distances for example in pipelines which are surrounded by thick layers of cladding.
KeywordsMagnetic Flux Deep Flaw Reciprocity Theorem Magnetic Field Data Transfer Impedance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.A. Cochran, C. Carr, D. McA. McKirdy, M. E. Walker, A. McNab, U.Klein, J. Kuznik, and G. B. Donaldson, in ENDE 95 Workshop Proceedings, ed. R. Collins (IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1995) in press.Google Scholar
- 3.P. Weidelt, J. Geophys. 41, 85 (1975).Google Scholar
- 4.A. P. Raiche, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc. 36, 363 (1974).Google Scholar
- 10.B. A. Auld, J. C. Moulder, S. Jeffries, P. J. Shull, S. Ayter and J. Kenney, Res. Nondestr. Eval. 1, 1(1989).Google Scholar
- 11.R. E. Beissner and J. A. G. Temple, in Review of Progress in QNDE, Vol. 9, eds. D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti (Plenum, New York, 1990), p. 257.Google Scholar
- 12.R. E. Beissner and J. S. Graves, in Review of Progress in QNDE, Vol 9, D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti Plenum, New York (1990) p. 885.Google Scholar