Abstract
The Westinghouse design of a 5 MJ, 2 MW, 2 second discharge µSMES unit is described in this report. The magnet consists of concentric, potted coil modules, each with a support structure designed to limit eddy currents. It operates in a bath of liquid helium. The individual modules are wound with a superconducting Rutherford cable which operates at 1500 amperes in a peak field of 3.5 T. The coil modules are layer wound and potted with the support structure. The magnet is designed so that it will not quench during discharge and the subsequent charge. This performance is calculated by determining the losses due to hysteresis and eddy currents and the resulting temperature rise. The magnet current is compared to the temperature and field dependent critical current to determine that the superconductor has adequate stability margin to prevent a quench. Losses are reduced by using a Rutherford cable and by controlling the interstrand resistance. When fully charged, adequate margin ensures superconducting operation of the magnet where the conductor margin is found by comparing the operating point to the critical surface. The quench current and field are determined from the intersection of the magnet load line and the superconductor critical surface. Magnetic field calculations are performed with the finite element code MAFCO, and the superconductor critical surface is defined by an empirical relationship. Although no quenches are expected during normal operation, a quench detection circuit and protection resistor are provided so that the temperature rise, estimated from the MIITS generated at a selected discharge voltage, is small ensuring no magnet damage. Joint design, operation, and margin are also described in this paper.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
W. J. Carr Jr., “AC Loss and Macroscopic Theory of Superconductors,” Gordon and Breach, NY (1983).
G. Morgan, “Eddy Currents in Flat Metal-Filled Conducting Braids,” JAP 44, No. 7, July 1973, p. 3319.
G. Morgan, “A Comparison of Two Analytic Forms for the Jc(B,T) Surface,” SSC Tech. Note. No. 310-1 (SSC-MD-218), (January 6, 1989).
McAshan, M.S., “MIITS Integrals for Copper and for Nb-46.5% Ti,” SSC-N-468, 1988.
Cryodata, P.O. Box 558, Niwot, CO 80544
Fickett, F.R., “A Preliminary Investigation of the Behavior of High Purity Copper in High Magnetic Fields,” INCRA Project No. 186, June 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Christianson, O.R. et al. (1996). Design and Projected Performance of the Westinghouse µSMES Unit. In: Kittel, P. (eds) Advances in Cryogenic Engineering. A Cryogenic Engineering Conference Publication, vol 41. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0373-2_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0373-2_44
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8022-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0373-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive