Abstract
The three standard options for the storage of hydrogen fuel on passenger vehicles are compressed gas, metal hydride and cryogenic liquid storage. The weight of the hydrogen storage system affects the performance of the vehicle. We examine vehicle performance as a function of hydrogen storage system type and capacity. The impact of storage system volume on vehicle performance is not addressed in this paper. Three vehicles are modeled, a metro commuter, a mid size sedan and a full size van. All vehicles are powered by a fuel cell and an electric drive train. The impact of auxiliary power requirements for air conditioning is also examined. In making these comparisons it is necessary to assume a driving cycle. We use the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) urban dynamometer driving schedule in all simulations to represent typical urban driving conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
W.F. Stewart, Operating Experience with a Liquid-Hydrogen Fueled Buick and Refueling System, J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 525 (1984).
W.J.D. Escher, Survey of Liquid Hydrogen Container Techniques for Highway Vehicle Fuel System Applications, U.S. Department of Energy Report, no. HCP/M2752–01 (1979).
C. Carpetis, Comparison of the Expenses Required for the On-Board Fuel Storage Systems of Hydrogen Powered Vehicles, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 61 (1982).
J.J. Donnelly, W.C. Greayer, R.J. Nichols, W.J.D. Escher, and E.E. Ecklund, Hydrogen-Powered vs Battery-Powered Automobiles, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 4, p. 411 (1979).
B.D. James, G.N. Baum, and I.F. Kuhn, Jr., Technology Development Goals for Automotive Fuel Cell Power Systems, Argonne National Laboratory Report, no. ANL-94/44(1994).
S.N. Sirosh, Application of Advanced Composites for Efficient On-Board Storage of Fuel in Natural Gas Vehicles, Proc. Int. Conference on Composite Materials and Energy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, p. 793 (1995).
F.J. Darms, Space Age Pressure Vessels, 36th Int. SAMPE Symposium, p. 818 (1991).
D.E. Daney, F.J. Edeskuty, M.A. Daugherty, F.C. Prenger, and D.D. Hill, Hydrogen Vehicle Fueling Station, Paper FR-S1–3, CEC/ICMC 1995.
D.H. Swan, B.E. Dickinson, and M.P. Arikara, Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Characterization for Electric Vehicle Applications, Advancements in Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicle Technology, SAE Special Report-1023, p. 19 (1994).
M. A. DeLuchi, Hydrogen Vehicles: An Evaluation of Fuel Storage Performance, Safety, Environmental Impacts, and Cost, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 81 (1989).
A.J. Appleby, Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Fuel, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 175(1994).
National Hydrogen Association, The Technology Assessment of Hydrogen Vehicles, NREL Report (1992).
W. Peschka, The Status of Handling and Storage Techniques for Liquid Hydrogen in Motor Vehicles, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 753 (1987).
F.E. Wicks, D. Marchionne, Development of a Model to Predict Electric Vehicle Performance Over a Variety of Driving Conditions, (1992).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daugherty, M.A., Prenger, F.C., Daney, D.E., Hill, D.D., Edeskuty, F.J. (1996). A Comparison of Hydrogen Vehicle Storage Options Using the EPA Urban Driving Schedule. In: Kittel, P. (eds) Advances in Cryogenic Engineering. A Cryogenic Engineering Conference Publication, vol 41. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0373-2_134
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0373-2_134
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8022-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0373-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive