Skip to main content

A Comparison of Hydrogen Vehicle Storage Options Using the EPA Urban Driving Schedule

  • Chapter
Advances in Cryogenic Engineering

Part of the book series: A Cryogenic Engineering Conference Publication ((ACRE,volume 41))

Abstract

The three standard options for the storage of hydrogen fuel on passenger vehicles are compressed gas, metal hydride and cryogenic liquid storage. The weight of the hydrogen storage system affects the performance of the vehicle. We examine vehicle performance as a function of hydrogen storage system type and capacity. The impact of storage system volume on vehicle performance is not addressed in this paper. Three vehicles are modeled, a metro commuter, a mid size sedan and a full size van. All vehicles are powered by a fuel cell and an electric drive train. The impact of auxiliary power requirements for air conditioning is also examined. In making these comparisons it is necessary to assume a driving cycle. We use the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) urban dynamometer driving schedule in all simulations to represent typical urban driving conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W.F. Stewart, Operating Experience with a Liquid-Hydrogen Fueled Buick and Refueling System, J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 525 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. W.J.D. Escher, Survey of Liquid Hydrogen Container Techniques for Highway Vehicle Fuel System Applications, U.S. Department of Energy Report, no. HCP/M2752–01 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Carpetis, Comparison of the Expenses Required for the On-Board Fuel Storage Systems of Hydrogen Powered Vehicles, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 61 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J.J. Donnelly, W.C. Greayer, R.J. Nichols, W.J.D. Escher, and E.E. Ecklund, Hydrogen-Powered vs Battery-Powered Automobiles, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 4, p. 411 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. B.D. James, G.N. Baum, and I.F. Kuhn, Jr., Technology Development Goals for Automotive Fuel Cell Power Systems, Argonne National Laboratory Report, no. ANL-94/44(1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. S.N. Sirosh, Application of Advanced Composites for Efficient On-Board Storage of Fuel in Natural Gas Vehicles, Proc. Int. Conference on Composite Materials and Energy, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, p. 793 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  7. F.J. Darms, Space Age Pressure Vessels, 36th Int. SAMPE Symposium, p. 818 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.E. Daney, F.J. Edeskuty, M.A. Daugherty, F.C. Prenger, and D.D. Hill, Hydrogen Vehicle Fueling Station, Paper FR-S1–3, CEC/ICMC 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.H. Swan, B.E. Dickinson, and M.P. Arikara, Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Characterization for Electric Vehicle Applications, Advancements in Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicle Technology, SAE Special Report-1023, p. 19 (1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. M. A. DeLuchi, Hydrogen Vehicles: An Evaluation of Fuel Storage Performance, Safety, Environmental Impacts, and Cost, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 81 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A.J. Appleby, Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Fuel, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 19, no. 2, p. 175(1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. National Hydrogen Association, The Technology Assessment of Hydrogen Vehicles, NREL Report (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Peschka, The Status of Handling and Storage Techniques for Liquid Hydrogen in Motor Vehicles, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 753 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. F.E. Wicks, D. Marchionne, Development of a Model to Predict Electric Vehicle Performance Over a Variety of Driving Conditions, (1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Daugherty, M.A., Prenger, F.C., Daney, D.E., Hill, D.D., Edeskuty, F.J. (1996). A Comparison of Hydrogen Vehicle Storage Options Using the EPA Urban Driving Schedule. In: Kittel, P. (eds) Advances in Cryogenic Engineering. A Cryogenic Engineering Conference Publication, vol 41. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0373-2_134

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0373-2_134

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8022-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0373-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics