Investment management in uncertainty

  • A. Terceño
  • J. de Andrés
  • M. G. Barberà
  • T. Lorenzana
Part of the Applied Optimization book series (APOP, volume 55)

Abstract

It is still not easy to define the content of the Financial Management of Companies but, even though we have no desire to create restrictions, we shall conceptualize it as the scientific discipline which attempts to optimally assign the scarce financial resources in a company both from the external and internal perspectives, that is to say, financial markets and financial management, respectively. This definition follows the most accepted meaning of Economy as the science which studies human behaviour as a relation between ends and scarce means which have alternative uses.

Keywords

Income Immobilization Aires Concession Baumol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

References

  1. i.
    Suárez (1998, 28)Google Scholar
  2. ii.
    Femández (1991, 346–347)Google Scholar
  3. iii.
    Kaufrnarm and Gil (1986,70)Google Scholar
  4. iv.
    \(\mathop q\limits_ \sim\) and \(\mathop r\limits_ \sim\)are positive fuzzy numbers, that is to say, \(\forall a \in \left[ {0,1} \right],\underline {q\left( a \right)} r\underline {\left( a \right)} >0\) Google Scholar
  5. v.
    For the lower limit \(\mathop E\nolimits_l = \frac{{\underline {\mathop C\nolimits^* \left( a \right)} - \underline {C\left( a \right)} }}{{\underline {C\left( a \right)} }}\)and will be calculated for upper limits in a simila way.Google Scholar
  6. vi.
    Terceño, Márquez and Belvis (1997)Google Scholar
  7. vii.
    Not all methods for comparing fuzzy numbers are transitive, in the sense that the condition \(\mathop A\limits_ \sim >\mathop B\limits_ \sim\)and\(\mathop B\limits_ \sim >\mathop C\limits_ \sim\)may be fulfilled, and yet \(\mathop A\limits_ \sim >\mathop C\limits_ \sim\)may not be true. As we have said, this means it is not always possible to carry out either a complete comparison, or, consequently, a total ranking of all the fuzzy numbers in which we are interested.Google Scholar
  8. viii.
    Comparison of n fuzzy numbers requires n(n-1)/2 comparative operations, which presents operational problems if n is a high number.Google Scholar
  9. ix.
    Any comparison problem can be solved when taken as a ranking problem. llte opposite is not always true.Google Scholar
  10. x.
    In addition to those cited in the text, the most Widely-known methods in fuzzy literature may be found in Freeling (1980, 341–354), McCahon and Lee (1990, 159–181) and Kitainik (1993, 109–136), although this list does not pretend to be exhaustive.Google Scholar
  11. xi.
    As a translation of ‘indice de consentimiento’, usecl by Kaufmann and Gil (1987).Google Scholar
  12. xii.
    In some ways, the index of consent that we have presented is a method of ordering fuzzy numbers.Google Scholar
  13. xiii.
    We are aware that the NPV and IRR models for investment selection as presented represent another series of limitations (choice of the calculation and reference interest rates respectively, reinvesnnent of intermediate cash flows at the interest rate or at the IRR itself, effects of inflation and taxes, inconsistency of the IRR criterion, interaction between projects, interrelation between the investment projects and their financing, optimum time distribution of the investments, etc.) We will focus the chapter exclusively on the inconveniences specified.Google Scholar
  14. xiv.
    In the example, we got the same ranking for a*=0 as for a*=0,2 by all the ranking methods used. Thus the thre,e investment projects under consideration offer results that are easily differentiated. Clearly, it does not have to be that way, and will depend on the actual form of the membership functions of the fuzzy numbers to be ranked.Google Scholar
  15. xv.
    We take the triangular approximation of the result obtained, for its ease of operation and for the minimal error made in its calculation.Google Scholar
  16. xvi.
    It is generally accepted that the value of a company can be identified with the discounted value of future dividends which participation in the capital will offer. In this way, \(\sum\nolimits_{\forall i} {\mathop w\nolimits_i } \mathop D\nolimits_i\)can be understood as the increase in the company’s value which will result from the current investment progranune.Google Scholar
  17. xvii.
    \(\mathop A\limits_ \sim \leqslant {}_{a*}\mathop B\limits_ \sim\)in the strict sense if \(\overline {A\left( {\mathop a\nolimits^* } \right)} \leqslant \underline {B\left( {\mathop a\nolimits^* } \right)}\)However, this is not usually taken into consideration in PLP as it is an excessively restrictive criterion.Google Scholar

Bibliography

  1. Adamo, J.M. (1980). “Fuzzy decision trees”. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 4.Google Scholar
  2. Baumol, W.J.; Quandt, R.E. (1966). “Investment and discount rate under capital rationing-a programming approach”. The Economic Journal. Vol. LXXV, No 298.Google Scholar
  3. Bellman, R.E.; Zadeh, L.A. (1970). “Decisión Making in a fuzzy environment”. Management Sciencies5.Google Scholar
  4. Biacino, L.; Simonelli, M.R. (1991). “The internal rate of return of fuzzy cash flow”. Rivista di matematica per le scienze economiche a sociali, No 2.Google Scholar
  5. Buckley, J.J (1992). “Solving fuzzy equations in economics and finance”. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 48.Google Scholar
  6. Buckley, J.J. (1987). “The fuzzy mathematics of finance”. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol 21.Google Scholar
  7. Buckley, J.J; Qu, Y. (1990). “On using a-cuts to evaluate fuzzy equations”. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 38.Google Scholar
  8. Buckley, J.J; Qu, Y. (1991). “Solving fuzzy equations: A new solution concept” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 39.Google Scholar
  9. Campos, L.M.; González, A. (1989). “A subjective approach for ranking fuzzy numbers”. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 29.Google Scholar
  10. Dubois, H.; Prade, D. (1983). “Ranking fuzzy numbers in the setting of possibility theory”. Information Sciencies 30.Google Scholar
  11. Fama, E. (1978). “The effect of a firm’s investment and financing decisions on the welfare of its security holders”. American Economic Review,No. 68.Google Scholar
  12. Fernández Blanco, M. et al. (1991). Dirección Financiera de la Empresa. Pirámide. Madrid.Google Scholar
  13. Freeling, A.N.S. (1980). “Fuzzy sets and decision analysis”. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 10.Google Scholar
  14. Fuller, R. (1986). “On a spetial type of fuzzy linear programming”. Colloquia Mathematics Societatis Janos Bolyai 49.Google Scholar
  15. Gil Aluja, J. (1997). Invertir en la incertidumbre. Pirámide. Madrid.Google Scholar
  16. Gil Aluja, J. (1995). “Towards a new concept of economic research”. Fuzzy Economic Review, No. 0.Google Scholar
  17. Jiménez, M. (1996). “La teoria de la posibilidad aplicada a1 cálculo financiero en incertidumbre”. Actualidad Financiera,No 3.Google Scholar
  18. Kaufmann, A.; Gil, J.; Terceño, A.. (1994). Matemática para la economίa y la gestión de empresas. Foro Científico. Barcelona.Google Scholar
  19. Kaufmann, A.; Gil, J. (1987). Técnicas operativas de gestión para el tratamiento de la incertidumbre. Hispano Europea. Madrid.Google Scholar
  20. Kaufmann, A.; Gil, J. (1986). Introducción de la teorίa de los subconjuntos borrosos a la gestión de las empresas. Santiago de Compostela. Milladoiro.Google Scholar
  21. Kaufmann, A.; Gupta, M.M. (1985). Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold. New York.Google Scholar
  22. Kitainik, L. (1993). Fuzzy Decision Procedures with Binary Relations. Towards a Unified Theory. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Norwell. Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  23. Lai, Y.J.; Hwang, C.L.. (1992). “A new approach to some possibilistic linear programming problem”. Fuzzy sets and systems,Vol. 49.Google Scholar
  24. Lai, Y.L; Hwang, C.L. (1992). Fuzzy mathematical programming. Springer-Verlag. Berlin.Google Scholar
  25. Lai, Y.L.; Hwang, C.L. (1996). Fuzzy multiple objective decision making. Springer-Verlag. Berlin.Google Scholar
  26. Lone, J.H.; Savage, L.J. (1955). “Three problems in Rationing Capital”. Journal of Business. October.Google Scholar
  27. Mao, J. (1977). Análisis Financiero. Ateneo. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
  28. Masse, P. (1963). La elección de inversiones. Sagitario. Barcelona.Google Scholar
  29. McCahon, C.S.; Lee. E.S. (1990). “Computing fuzzy numbers: the proportion of the optimum method”. International Journal ofApproximate Reasoning, No. 4.Google Scholar
  30. Ramik, J.; Rimanek, J. (1985). “Inequality relation between fuzzy numbers and its use in fuzzy optimization”. Fuzzy sets and systems,Vol 16.Google Scholar
  31. Romero, M.; Martίn, E. (1983). “Programación de inversiones en un entorno borroso”. Gestión Científica. Vol 1.Google Scholar
  32. Rommelfanger, H.; Hanuscheck, R.; Wolf, J. (1989) “Linear programming with fuzzy objectives”. Fuzzy sets and systems, Vol. 29.Google Scholar
  33. Rommerfanger, H. (1989). “Interactive decision making in fuzzy linear optimization problems”. EuropeAn journal of operational research 41.Google Scholar
  34. Suárez Suárez, A.S. (1994). Decisiones óptimas de inversión y financiación. Pirámide. Madrid.Google Scholar
  35. Tanaka, H.; Asai, K. (1984). “Fuzzy linear programming with fuzzy numbers”. Fuzzy sets and systems, Vol. 13.Google Scholar
  36. Terceño, A.; Barberá, G.; de Andrés, J.. (1997). “Análisis y selección de préstamos en condiciones de incertidumbre”. Actas del IV Congreso de SIGEF. Cuba.Google Scholar
  37. Terceño, A.; Marquez, N.; Belvis, C. (1997). “Un estudio sobre las aproximaciones a las expresiones financieras inciertas”. Actas del IV Congreso de SIGEF. Cuba.Google Scholar
  38. Terceño, A.; Sáez, J.; Barberá, M.G.; Ortí, F.; de Andrés, J.; Belvis, C. (1997). Matemática Financiera. Pirámide. Madrid.Google Scholar
  39. Weingartner, H.M. (1966). “Capital budgeting of interrelated projects: survey and synthesis”. Management Science. Vol. XII, No 7.Google Scholar
  40. Yager, R.R. (1978). “Ranking fuzzy subsets over the unit interval”. Proceedings of the 1978 CDC. 1435–1437.Google Scholar
  41. Yager, R.R. (1980). “On choosing between fuzzy subsets”. Kybernetes, No. 9.Google Scholar
  42. Yager, R.R. (1981). “A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval”. Information Science, No. 24.Google Scholar
  43. Yuan, Y. (1991). “Criteria for evaluating fuzzy ranking methods”. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 44.Google Scholar
  44. Zhu, Q. Y; Lee, E.S. (1992). “Comparison and ranking of fuzzy numbers”. En Kacprzyk, J.; Fedrizzi, M. Eds. Fuzzy Regression Analysis. Omnitech Press Warsaw and Physica-Verlag Heidelberg. Warsaw. 21–44.Google Scholar
  45. Zimmermann, H.J. (1976). “Description and optimization of fuzzy system”. International journal of general system 2.Google Scholar
  46. Zimmermann, H.J. (1985). Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer academic publishers. DordrechtGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Terceño
  • J. de Andrés
  • M. G. Barberà
  • T. Lorenzana

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations