Nevanlinna Theory and Stochastic Calculus

Some Applications of Stochastic First Main Theorem
  • Atsushi Atsuji
Part of the International Society for Analysis, Applications and Computation book series (ISAA, volume 7)

Abstract

Several relationships between classical function theory and analysis of Brownian motion have been studied by many authors (cf. [9], [5]). Davis gave an elegant proof of Picard’s theorem in [8] which impressed us with their intimacy. It also gave some possibility to study value-distribution of meromorphic functions through Brownian motion or stochastic calculus. It is curious that there had been no article noting a simple relation between Nevanlinna theory and Brownian motion until Carne’s paper [6]. He considered some probabilistic aspects of classical Nevanlinna theory. After the work the author improved it to several dimensional cases in [1]. In this note we exemplify this natural relation between stochastic calculus and Nevanlinna theory by considering a stochastic generalization of first main theorem of Nevanlinna and its applications.

Keywords

Manifold 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A. Atsuji, “Nevanlinna theory via stochastic calculus.” Jour. Fanct. Anal. vol. 132, No. 2 1995, 437–510MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Atsuji “A Casorati-Weierstrass theorem for holomorphic maps and invariant σ—fields of holomorphic diffusions.” Bull.Sci.math. 123 (1999), 371–383.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Atsuji, “Liouville property and minimal surfaces.” in preparation.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Atsuji, “Remarks on harmonic maps into a cone from stochastically complete manifolds.” Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A 75 (1999), 105–108.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    R. F. Bass, Probabilistic techniques in analysis. Probability and its Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    T. K. Carne, “Brownian motion and Nevanlinna theory.” Jour Proc. London Math. Soc. vol 52, 1986, 349–368MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. W. R. Darling, “Convergence of martingales on a Riemannian manifold.” Publ.Res.Inst.Math.Kyoto Univ., 19 (1983), 753–763.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    B. Davis, “Picard’s theorem and Brownian motion.” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 213 (1975), 353–362.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    B. Davis, “Brownian motion and analytic functions.” Ann. Probab. 7 (1979), no. 6, 913–932.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    [10] K. D. Elworthy, X. M. Li and M. Yor, “On the tails of the supremum and the quadratic variation of strictly local martingales.” Séminaire de Probabilités XXXI, Lect.Note Math.1655(1997), Springer.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    R. E. Molzon, “Potential theory on complex projective space: application to characterization of pluripolar sets and growth of analytic varieties.” Ill.Jour.Math., 28 (1984), 103–119.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    H. Omori, “Isometric immersions of Riemannian manifolds.” J. Math. Soc. Japan, 19 (1967), 205–214.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    S. T. Yau, “Harmonic functions on complete Riemannian manifolds.” Comm.Pure.Appl.Math., 28 (1975), 201–228.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atsushi Atsuji
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Graduate School of ScienceOsaka UniversityToyonaka, OsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations