Skip to main content

Putty-Putty, Putty-Clay or Humpty-Dumpty?

Universal Service Under Entry

  • Chapter
Postal and Delivery Services

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series ((TREP,volume 41))

Abstract

In investment theory, investments that can be reversed without penalty are referred to as putty-putty, while those with costs that are completely sunk are referred to as putty-clay. As we will note below, the universal service obligation (USO) may be a case of political economic irreversibility that, if ineptly managed, may lead to a complete unraveling of the viability of the affected sector. Our primary interest is the USO in the postal sector, but the default service obligation is also very much a part of other network industries, and we explore the issue in a more general framework, which provides insights for the deregulation of network industries more generally. Although deregulation is a relatively recent innovation it already has had profound effects on network industries. While its impact on the postal sector has been even more recent and its full effect has yet to be felt, this should be seen as an opportunity for the postal sector to learn from some of the lessons of the other industries. An understanding of the basis for and effects of deregulation generally is beneficial in determining the implications for the USO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chao, Hung-Po, and Stephen C. Peck. 1996. “A Market Mechanism for Electric Power Transmission.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 10 (1): 25–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Robert H., William W. Ferguson, John D. Waller, and Spyros S. Xenakis. 2000. “Universal Service without a Monopoly.” In Current Directions in Postal Reform, edited by Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleindorfer. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, Michael A., and Paul R. Kleindorfer. 1986. The Economics of Public Utility Regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, Michael A., and Paul R. Kleindorfer. 1998. “Efficient Entry, Monopoly, and the Universal Service Obligation in Postal Service.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 14 (2): 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crew, Michael A., and Paul R. Kleindorfer. 2000. “Liberalization and the Universal Service Obligation in Postal Service.” In Current Directions in Postal Reform, edited by Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleindorfer. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, Michael A., and Paul R. Kleindorfer. 2001. “Whither the USO under Competitive entry: A Microstructure Approach.” In Future Directions in Postal Reform,edited by Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleindorfer. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Donder, Philippe, Helmuth Cremer, Jean-Pierre Florens, André Grimaud, and Frank Rodriguez. 2001. “Uniform Pricing and Postal Market Liberalization.” In Future Directions in Postal Reform, edited by Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleindorfer. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Victor P. 1976. “Regulation and Administered Contracts.” The Bell Journal of Economics 7–2 (Autumn): 426–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, Martin, Robert Klein and Paul R. Kleindorfer. 2000. “The Demand for Catastrophe Insurance,” Working Paper, Wharton Center for Risk Management and Decision Processes, University of Pennsylvania, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, William W. 1992. “Contract Networks for Electric Power Transmission.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 4 (3): 211–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Richard A. 1969. “Natural Monopoly and its Regulation.” Stanford Law Review 21 (February): 548–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, Richard A. 1974. ‘Theories of Economic Regulation.“ Bell Journal of Economics 5 (Autumn): 335–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ros, Agustin J., and Karl McDermott. 2000. “Are Residential Local Exchange Services Too Low.” In Expanding Competition in Regulated Industries,edited by Michael A. Crew. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, Roger, and Anthony George. 1979. “Second-best Pricing for the U. S. Postal Service,” Southern Economic Journal 45: 685–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, Gordon. 1967. “The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies and Theft.” Western Economic Journal 5 (June): 224–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, Roger, and Ralph A. Winter. 1986. “Public Pricing under Imperfect Competition.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 4: 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, John D. 2001. “Private Passenger Insurance in New Jersey: a Three Decade Advert for Reform.” AEI-Brookings Conference on Insurance Regulation, January 18, 2001, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crew, M.A., Kleindorfer, P.R. (2002). Putty-Putty, Putty-Clay or Humpty-Dumpty?. In: Crew, M.A., Kleindorfer, P.R. (eds) Postal and Delivery Services. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 41. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0253-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0253-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7962-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0253-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics