Skip to main content

Global Dynamic Optimization of Linear Hybrid Systems

  • Conference paper
Frontiers in Global Optimization

Part of the book series: Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications ((NOIA,volume 74))

Abstract

Hybrid systems, which exhibit both discrete state and continuous state behavior, have become the modeling framework of choice for a wide variety of applications that require detailed dynamic models with embedded discontinuities. Economic, environmental, safety and quality considerations in these applications, such as the automated design of safe operating procedures and the formal verification of embedded systems, strongly motivate the development of algorithms and tools for the global optimization of hybrid systems. For safety critical tasks such as formal verification, it is crucial that the global solution be found within epsilon optimality.

Recently, a deterministic algorithm has been proposed for the global optimization of linear time varying hybrid systems in the continuous time domain, provided the transition times and the sequence of modes are fixed. This work is extended by presenting a method for determining the optimal mode sequence when the transition times are fixed. A reformulation of the problem by introducing binary decision variables while retaining the linearity of the underlying dynamic system is proposed. This allows recently developed convexity theory for linear time varying continuous systems to be employed to construct a convex relaxation of the resulting mixed-integer dynamic optimization problem, which enables the global solution to be found in a finite number of iterations using nonconvex outer approximation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adjiman C.S., Androulakis I.P. and Floudas C.A. (2000), “Global optimization of mixed-integer nonlinear problems,” AIChE J. Vol. 46, 1769–1797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adjiman C.S., Dallwig S., Floudas C.A. and Neumaier A. (1998), “A global optimization method, aBB, for general twice-differentiable constrained NLPs - I. Theoretical advances,” Comput. Chem. Eng. Vol. 22, 1137–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alur R., Courcoubetis C., Halbwachs N., Henzinger T.A., Ho P.H., Nicollin X., Olivero A., Sifakis J. and Yovine S. (1995), “The algorithmic analysis of hybrid systems,” Theor. Comput. Sci. Vol. 138, 3–34.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Avraam M.P., Shah N. and Pantelides C.C. (1998), “Modelling and optimisation of general hybrid systems in the continuous time domain,” Comput. Chem. Eng. Vol. 22, S221–S228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bagajewicz M.J. and Manousiouthakis V. (1991), “On the generalized Benders decomposition,” Comput. Chem. Eng. Vol. 15, 691–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barton P.I., Allgor R.J., Feehery W.F. and Galan S. (1998), “Dynamic optimization in a discontinuous world,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. Vol. 37, 966–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barton P.I., Banga J.R. and Galan S. (2000), “Optimization of hybrid discrete/continuous dynamic systems,” Comput. Chem. Eng. Vol. 24, 2171–2182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barton P.I. and Lee C.K. (2002), “Modeling, simulation, sensitivity analysis and optimization of hybrid systems,” ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. Vol. 12, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barton P.I. and Lee C.K. (2003), “Design of process operations using hybrid dynamic optimization,” in Grossmann I.E. and McDonald C.M., Editors, “Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Operations,” 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barton P.I. and Pantelides C.C. (1994), “Modeling of combined discrete/continuous processes,” AIChE J. Vol. 40, 966–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bemporad A., Borrelli F. and Morari M. (2000), “Optimal controllers for hybrid systems: Stability and piecewise linear explicit form,” in “Proc. 39th IEEE Conf. Decis. Control,” Vol. 2, 1810–1815.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Branicky M.S., Borkar V.S. and Mitter S.K. (1998), “A unified framework for hybrid control: Model and optimal control theory,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control Vol. 43, 31–45.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Clabaugh J.A., Tolsma J.E. and Barton P.I. (1999), “ABACUSS II: Advanced modeling environment and embedded simulator,” http://yoric.mit.edu/abacuss2/abacuss2.html.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coddington E.A. and Levinson N. (1955), Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations, McGraw Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Cuzzola F.A. and Morari M. (2001), “A generalized approach for analysis and control of discrete-time piecewise affine and hybrid systems,” in Benedetto M.D.D. and Sangiovanni-Vincentelli A., Editors, “Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control,” Vol. 2034 of Lect. Notes in Comput. Sci., 189–203, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Duran M.A. and Grossmann I.E. (1986), “An outer-approximation algorithm for a class of mixed-integer nonlinear programs,” Math. Programming Vol. 36, 307–339.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Falk J.E. and Soland R.M. (1969), “An algorithm for separable nonconvex programming problems,” Manage. Sci. Vol. 15, 550–569.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Feehery W.F., Tolsma J.E. and Barton P.I. (1997), “Efficient sensitivity analysis of large-scale differential-algebraic systems,” Appl. Numer. Math. Vol. 25, 41–54.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Fletcher R. and Leyffer S. (1994), “Solving mixed integer nonlinear programs by outer approximation,” Math. Programming Vol. 66, 327–349.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Floudas C.A. (1995), Nonlinear and Mixed-Integer Optimization: Fundamentals and Applications, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Galan S. and Barton P.I. (1998), “Dynamic optimization of hybrid systems,” Comput. Chem. Eng. Vol. 22, S183–S190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Galan S., Feehery W.F. and Barton P.I. (1999), “Parametric sensitivity functions for hybrid discrete/continuous systems,” Appl. Numer. Math. Vol. 31, 17–48.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Horst R. and Tuy H. (1993), Global Optimization, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kesavan P., Allgor R.J., Gatzke E.P. and Barton P.I. (2001), “Outer approximation algorithms for separable nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programs,” Submitted to: Math. Programming, available from http://yoric.mit.edu/publications.html.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kesavan P. and Barton P.I. (2000), “Decomposition algorithms for nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programs,” AIChE Symp. Ser. Vol. 96, 458–461.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kocis G.R. and Grossmann I.E. (1989), “A modelling and decomposition strategy for the MINLP optimization of process flowsheets,” Comprit. Chem. Eng. Vol. 13, 797–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee C.K., Singer A.B. and Barton P.I. (2002), “Global optimization of linear hybrid systems with explicit transitions,” Submitted to: Syst. Control Lett., available from http://yoric.mit.edu/publications.html.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McCormick G.P. (1976), “Computability of global solutions to factorable nonconvex programs: Part I - convex underestimating problems,” Math. Programming Vol. 10, 147–175.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Ryoo H.S. and Sahinidis N.V. (1996), “A branch-and-reduce approach to global optimization,” J. Global Optim. Vol. 8, 107–139.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Sahinidis N.V. and Grossmann I.E. (1991), “Convergence properties of generalized Benders decomposition,” Comput. Chem. Eng. Vol. 15,481–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shakernia O., Pappas G.J. and Sastry S. (2000), “Semidecidable controller synthesis for classes of linear hybrid systems,” in “Proc. 39th IEEE Conf. Decis. Control,” Vol. 2, 1834–1839.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Singer A.B. and Barton P.I. (2001), “Global solution of linear dynamic embedded optimization problems - Part I: Theory,” Submitted to: J. Optim. Theor. Appl., available from http://yoric.mit.edu/publications.html.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Singer A.B. and Barton P.I. (2003), “Global optimization with nonlinear ordinary differential equations - Part I: Theory,” Submitted to: J. Optim. Theor. Appl.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Teo K., Goh G. and Wong K. (1991), A Unified Computational Approach to Optimal Control Problems, Pitman Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tolsma J.E. and Barton P.I. (2000), “DAEPACK: An open modeling environment for legacy models,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. Vol. 39, 1826–1839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tolsma J.E. and Barton P.I. (2002), “Hidden discontinuities and parametric sensitivity calculations,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput. Vol. 23, 1862–1875.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Trontis A. and Spathopoulos M.P. (2001), “Target control for hybrid systems with linear continuous dynamics,” in “Proc. 40th IEEE Conf. Decis. Control,” Vol. 2, 1229–1234.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Xu X. and Antsaklis P.J. (2001), “An approach for solving general switched linear quadratic optimal control problems,” in “Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,” 2478–2483.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, C.K., Barton, P.I. (2004). Global Dynamic Optimization of Linear Hybrid Systems. In: Floudas, C.A., Pardalos, P. (eds) Frontiers in Global Optimization. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol 74. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0251-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0251-3_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7961-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0251-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics