Abstract
One of the important points in molecular conformation problems is the evaluation of the gradient and Hessian of potential energy functions. These functions consist of a set of energy contributions, called the force field, for approximating the interactions between atoms of a molecule. Our discussion will focus on potential energy functions that have most common terms in general force fields. We can describe potential energy functions using Cartesian coordinates or internal coordinates (bond lengths, bond angles, and torsion angles). Analytic evaluation of the gradient with respect to the internal coordinates requires O(N 4) steps, where N is the number of atoms involved. We prove that the gradient and Hessian with respect to the Cartesian coordinates are evaluated in O(N 2)and O(N 3)steps, respectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allinger N. L., Yuh Y. H. and Lii J.-H. (1989), “Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 111, 8551–8582.
Barbosa H., Raupp F., Lavor C., Lima H. and Maculan N. (2000), “A hybrid genetic algorithm for finding stable conformations of small molecules”, Proc. of the VIth Brazilian Symposium on Neural Networks, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, 90–94.
Brodmeier T. and Pretsch E. (1994), “Application of genetic algorithms in molecular modeling”, J. Comp. Chem., Vol. 15, 588–595.
Brooks B. R., Bruccoleri R. E., Olafson B. D., States D. J., Swaminathan S. and Karplus M. (1983), “CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy minimization and dynamics calculations”, J. Comp. Chem. Vol. 4, 187–217.
Floudas C. A., Klepeis J. L. and Pardalos P. M. (1999), “Global Optimization Approaches in Protein Folding and Peptide Docking,” In DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 47, 141–171, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island.
Floudas C. A. and Pardalos P. M. (2000), Optimization in Computational Chemistry and Molecular Biology, Nonconvex Optimization and its Applications, Vol. 40, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
Kawai H., Kikuchi T. and Okamoto Y. (1989), “A prediction of tertiary structures of peptide by Monte Carlo simulated annealing method”, Protein Eng., Vol. 3, 85–94.
Kostrowicki J. and Scheraga H. A. (1992), “Application of the diffusion equation method for global optimization to oligopeptides”, J. Phys. Chem., Vol. 96, 7442–7449.
Maranas C. D. and Floudas C. A. (1994), “Global Minimum Potential Energy Conformations of Small Molecules”, J. Global Opt., Vol. 4, 135–170.
Maranas C. D. and Floudas C. A. (1994), “A Deterministic Global Optimization Approach for Molecular Structure Determination”, J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 100, 1247–1261.
Moret M. A., Pascutti P. G., Bisch P. M. and Mundim K. C. (1998), “Stochastic molecular optimization using generalized simulated annealing”, J. Comp. Chem, Vol. 19, 647–657.
Némethy G., Gibson K. D., Palmer K. A., Yoon C. N., Paterlini G., Zagari A., Rumsey S. and Scheraga H. A. (1992), “Energy parameters in polypeptides. 10. Improved geometrical parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm with application to proline-containing peptides”, J. Phys. Chem. Vol. 96, 6472–6484.
Neumaier A. (1997), “Molecular Modeling of Proteins and Mathematical Prediction of Protein Structure,” SIAM Rev., Vol. 39, 407–460.
Pardalos P. M., Shalloway D. and Xue G. L. (1994), “Optimization methods for computing global minima of nonconvex potential energy functions”, J. Global Optim., Vol. 4, 117–133.
Phillips A. T., Rosen J. B. and Walke V. H. (1996), “Molecular structure determination by convex underestimation of local energy minima”, In DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 23, 181–198, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island.
Piela L., Kostrowicki J. and Scheraga H. A. (1989), “The multiple-minima problem in the conformational analysis of molecules. Deformation of the potential energy hyper-surface by the diffusion equation method”, J. Phys. Chem., Vol. 93, 3339–3346.
Pogorelov A. (1987), Geometry, Mir Publishers, Moscow.
Thompson H. B. (1967), “Calculation of Cartesian Coordinates and their Derivatives from Internal Molecular Coordinates”, J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 47, 3407–3410.
Troyer J. M. and Cohen F. E. (1991),“Simplified models for understanding and predicting protein structure”, Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Vol. II, 57–80, VCH Publ., New York.
Wales D. J. and Scheraga H. A. (1999), “Global optimization of clusters, crystals and biomolecules”, Science, Vol. 285, 1368–1372.
Weiner S. J., Kollmann P. A., Nguyen D. T. and Case D. A. (1986), “An all atom force field for simulations of proteins and nucleic acids”, J. Comp. Chem., Vol. 7, 230–252.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lavor, C., Maculan, N. (2004). Reducing the Cost of Evaluation of the Gradient and Hessian of Molecular Potential Energy Functions. In: Floudas, C.A., Pardalos, P. (eds) Frontiers in Global Optimization. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications, vol 74. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0251-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0251-3_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7961-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0251-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive