Abstract
The basic body plan of a number of vertebrates results from two processes that occur early in the development of the blastoderm: large scale rearrangements of tissue via a process called gastrulation, and axial subdivision of tissue in a process called somitogenesis. The first step of gastrulation in avians is formation of the primitive streak, which marks the first clear manifestation of the anterior-posterior axis. Cell movements that occur through the streak ultimately convert the single layeredblastoderm into a trilaminar blastoderm comprising prospective endodermal, mesodermal and ectodermal tissue. During streak formation a group of cells moves anteriorly as a coherent column from the posterior end of the blastoderm, and as it proceeds other cells stream over the lateral edges of the furrow left behind. The anterior end of the streak is a specialized structure called Hensen’s node, which serves as an organizing center for later axis formation and determination of the left-right asymmetry of the body. Soon after the primitive streak forms, Hensen’s node regresses towards the tail, leaving the notochord and a pair of segmental plates parallel to the primitive streak in its wake. The posterior end of the segmental plate moves down the cranio-caudal axis with the node, as more cells are added to it by cell division within the plate and by cells entering from the primitive streak. A pair of somites forms from the anterior ends of the two plates at regular intervals. Despite the fact that much is known about the basic biological processes, the mechanisms that underlie the formation of the primitive streak and somitogenesis are still unknown, and elucidating them is one of the major unsolved problems in developmental biology. Mathematical modelling has been a useful tool in this process, as it provides a framework in which to study the outcome of proposed interactions and can make experimentally testable predictions. In this paper we outline the biological background of these processes and reviewexisting models of them.
Key words
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. Abercrombie, The effects of antero-posterior reversal of lengths of the primitive streak in the, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B., 234 (1950), pp. 317–338.
H. Aoyama and K. Asamoto, Determination of somite cells: Independence of cell differentiation and morphogenesis, Development, 104 (1988), pp. 15–28.
Y. Azar and H. Eyal-Giladi, Marginal zone cells, the primitive streak inducing component of the primary hypoblast in the chick., J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 52 (1979), pp. 79–88.
—, Interaction of epiblast and hypoblast in the formation of the primitive streak and the embryonic axis in the chick, as revealed by hypoblast rotation experiments., J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 61 (1981), pp. 133–144.
R. Bachvarova, Establishment of anterior-posterior polarity in avian embryos, Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev., 9 (1999), pp. 411–416.
R. Bachvarova, I. Skromme, and C.D. Stern, Induction of primitive streak and hensen’s node by the posterior marginal zone in the early chick embryo, Development, 125 (1998), pp. 3521–3534.
R. Bellairs, The development of somites in the chick embryo, J. Embryol. Exp. Morph., 11 (1963), pp. 697–714.
—, The segmentation of somites in the chick embryo, Bull. Zool., 47 (1980), pp. 245–252.
R. Bellairs, D.A. Ede, and J.W. Lash, eds., Somites in Developing Embryos, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1986.
R. Bellairs and M. Osmond, The Atlas of Chick Development, Academic Press, London, 1998.
R. Bellairs and M. Veini, An experimental analysis of somite segmentation in the chick embryo., J. Embryol. Exp. Morph., 55 (1980), pp. 93–108.
J. Butler, E. Cosmos, and P. Cauwenbergs, Positional signals: Evidence for a possible role in muscle fibre-type patterning of the embryonic avian limb, Development, 102 (1988), pp. 763–772.
M. Callebaut and E.V. Nueten, Rauber’s (koller’s) sickle: the early gastrulation organizer of the avian blastoderm., Eur. J. Morph., 32 (1994), pp. 35–48.
M. Callebaut, E. Van Nueten, F. Harrisson, L. Van Nassauw, A. Schrevens, and H. Bortier, Avian gastrulation and neurulation are not impaired by the removal of the marginal zone at the unincubated blastoderm stage, Eur. J. Morphol., 35 (1997), pp. 69–77.
D. Canning and C. Stern, Changes in the expression of the carbohydrate epitope hnk-1 associated with mesoderm induction in the chick embryo., Development, 104 (1988), pp. 643–655.
M. Catala, M.-A. Teillet, and N.M.L. Douarin, Organization and development of the tail bud analyzed with the quail-chick chimera system, Mech. Dev., 51 (1995), pp. 51–65.
K. Chada, J. Magram, and F. Constantini, An embryonic pattern of expression of a human fetal globin gene in transgenic mice, Nature, 319 (1986), pp. 685–689.
E.A.G. Chernoff and S.R. Hilfer, Calcium dependence and contraction in somite formation, Tiss. Cell., 14 (1982), pp. 435–449.
A. Chevallier, Role of the somitic mesoderm in the development of the thorax in bird embryos. II. Origin of thoracic and appendicular musculature, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 49 (1979), pp. 73–88.
A. Chevallier, M. Kieny, and A. Mauger, Limb-somite relationship: origin of the limb musculature, Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology, 41 (1977), pp. 245–258.
—, Limb-somite relationship: Effects of removal of somitic mesoderm on the wing musculature, J. Embryol. Exp. Morph., 43 (1978), pp. 263–278.
J. Cooke, A gene that resuscitates a theory — somitogenesis and a molecular oscillator, Trends in Genetics (Personal edition), 14 (1998), pp. 85–88.
J. Cooke, S. Takada, and A. Mcmahon, Experimental control of axial pattern in the chick blastoderm by local expression of wnt and activin: the role of hnk-1 positive cells., Dev. Biol., 164 (1994), pp. 513–527.
J. Cooke and E.C. Zeeman, A clock and wavefront model for control of the number of repeated structures during animal morphogenesis, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 58 (1976), pp. 455–476.
I. Del Barco Barrantes, A.J. Ella, K. Wünsch, M.H. De Angelis, T.W. Mak, J. Rossant, R.A. Conlon, A. Gossler, and J.L. De La Pompa, Interaction between notch signalling and lunatic fringe during somite boundary formation in the mouse, Curr. Biol., 9 (1999), pp. 470–480.
J. Duband, S. Dufour, K. Hatta, M. Takeichi, G.M. Edelman, and J.P. Thiery, Adhesion molecules during somitogenesis in the avian embryo, J. Cell Biol., 104 (1987), pp. 1361–1374.
Y. Evrard, Y. Lun, A. Aulehla, L. Gan, and R.L. Johnson, lunatic fringe is an essential mediator of somite segmentation and patterning, Nature, 394 (1998), pp. 377–381.
H. Eyal-Giladi, Gradual establishment of cell commitments during the early states of chick development, Cell Differ., 14 (1984), pp. 245–255.
—, Establishment of the axis in chordates: facts and speculations, Development, 124 (1997), pp. 2285–2296.
H. Eyal-Giladi and O. Khaner, The chick’s marginal zone and primitive streak formation, Dev. Biol., 134 (1989), pp. 215–221.
H. Eyal-Giladi and S. Kochav, From cleavage to primitive streak formation: a complementary normal table and a new look at the first stages of the development of the chick. i. general morphology, Dev. Biol., 49 (1976), pp. 321–337.
O.P. Flint, D.A. Ede, O.K. Wilby, and J. Proctor, Control of somite number in normal and Amputated mutant mouse embryos: an experimental and a theoretical analysis, Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology, 45 (1978), pp. 189–202.
H. Forsberg, F. Crozet, and N.A. Brown, Waves of mouse lunatic fringe expression, in four-hour cycles at two-hour intervals, precede somite boundary formation., Curr. Biol., 8 (1998), pp. 1027–1030.
S.J. Gaunt, Mouse homeobox gene transcripts occupy different but overlapping domains in embryonic germ layers and organs: A comparison of Hox-3.1 and Hox-1.5, Development (Cambridge), 103 (1988), pp. 135–144.
S.F. Gilbert, Developmental Biology, Sinauer Associates, fifth ed., 1997.
A. Gossler and M. Hrabe De Angelis, Somitogenesis, in Curr. Topics in Dev. Biol., vol. 38, Academic Press, 1998, pp. 225–287. Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine 04609, USA.
C. Grabowski, The effects of the excision of hensen’s node on the early development of the chick embryo, J. Exp. Zool., 133 (1956), pp. 301–344.
V. Hamburger and H. Hamilton, A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo.
Y. Hatada and C.D. Stern, A fate map of the epiblast of the early chick embryo, Development, 120 (1994), pp. 2879–2889.
P.W.H. Holland and B.L.M. Hogan, Expression of homeo box genes during development: A review, Genes. Dev., 2 (1988), pp. 773–782.
J. Izpisua-Belmonte, E.D. Robertis, K. Storey, and C. Stern, The homeobox gene goosecoid and the origin of organizer cells in the early chick blastoderm., Cell., 74 (1993), pp. 645–659.
A. Jacobson and S. Meier, Somites in Developing Embryos, vol. 118 of NATO ASI series. Series A, Life sciences, New York: Plenum Press., 1986, ch. Somitomeres: The primordial body segments, pp. 1–16.
K. Joubin and C. Stern, Molecular interactions continuously define the organizer during cell movements of gastrulation, Cell, 98 (1999), pp. 559–571.
R. Keller, Vital dye mapping of the gastrula and neurula of xenopus laevis. i. prospective areas and morphogenetic movements of the superficial layer, Dev. Biol., 42 (1975), pp. 222–241.
—, The cellular basis of epiboly: An sem study of deep cell rearrangement during gastrulation in xenopus laevis, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 60 (1980), pp. 201–234.
R. Keller, J. Shih, and P. Wilson, Cell Motility, Control, and Function of Convergence and Extension During Gastrulation in Xenopus, in Gastrulation: Movements, Patterns, and Molecules, au]W. C. R. Keller and F. Griffen, eds., Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1991.
M. Kessel, Respecification of vertebral identities by retinoic acid, Development (Cambridge), 115 (1992), pp. 487–501.
M. Kessel and P. Gruss, Homeotic transformations of murine prevertebrae and concomitant alteration of Hox codes induced by retinoic acid, Cell, 67 (1991), pp. 89–104.
R. J. Keynes and C.D. Stern, Mechanisms of vertebrate segmentation, Development (Cambridge), 103 (1988), pp. 413–429.
O. Khaner, Axis determination in the avian embryo, Curr. Topics in Dev. Biol., 28 (1993), pp. 155–180.
—, The rotated hypoblast of the chicken embryo does not initiate an ectopic axis in the epiblast, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 92 (1995), pp. 10733–10737.
—, The ability to initiate an axis in the avian blastula is concentrated mainly at a posterior site., Dev Biol, 194 (1998), pp. 257–266. Department of Cell and Animal Biology, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
O. Khaner and H. Eyal-Giladi, The embryo forming potency of the posterior marginal zone in stage x through xii of the chick., Dev. Biol., 115 (1986), pp. 275–281.
—, The chick’s marginal zone and primitive streak formation. I Coordinative effect of induction and inhibition, Developmental Biology, 134 (1989), pp. 206–214.
M. Kieny, A. Mauger, and P. Sengel, Early regionalization of somite mesoderm as studied by the development of axil skeleton of the chick embryo, Dev. Biol., 28 (1972), pp. 142–161.
S. Kochav and H. Eyal-giladi, Bilateral symmetry in chick embryo, determination by gravity, Science, 171 (1971), pp. 1027–1029.
R. Krumlauf, Hox genes in vertebrate development, Cell, 78 (1994), pp. 191–201.
M. Levin, Left-right asymmetry and the chick embryo, Sem. Cell. Dev. Biol., (1998).
K. Linask, C. Ludwig, M. D. Hang, X. Liu, and K. K. G. L. Radice, N-Cadherin/Catenin-mediated morphoregulation of somite formation, Dev. Biol., 202 (1998), pp. 85–102.
M. McGrew, J. Dale, S. Fraboulet, and O. Pourquié, The lunatic fringe gene is a target of the molecular clock linked to somite segmentation in avian embryos, Curr. Biol., 8 (1998), pp. 979–982.
M.J. McGrew and O. Pourquie, Somitogenesis: segmenting a vertebrate, Current opinion in genetics and development, 8 (1998), pp. 487–493.
S. Meier, Development of the chick embryo mesoblast: Formation of the embryonic axis and establishment of the metameric pattern. Dev. Biol., 73 (1979), pp. 24–45.
H. Meinhardt, Models of Biological Pattern Formation, Academic Press, New York, USA, 1982.
—, Somites in Developing Embryos, vol. 118 of NATO ASI series. Series A, Life sciences, New York: Plenum Press., 1986, ch. Models of segmentation, pp. 179–189.
E. Mitrani and Y. Shimoni, Induction by soluble factors of organized axial structures in chick epiblasts, Science, 247 (1990), pp. 1092–1094.
P. Nieuwkoop, Origin and establishment of embryonic polar axes in amphibian development, Curr. Topics Dev. Biol., 11 (1977), pp. 115–132.
S. Nonaka, Y. Tanaka, Y. Okada, S. Takeda, A. Harada, Y. Kanai, M. Kido, and N. Hirokawa, Randomization of left-right asymmetry due to loss of nodal cilia generating leftward flow of extraembryonic fluid lacking kifSb motor protein, Cell, 95 (1998), pp. 829–837.
Y. Okada, S. Nonaka, Y. Tanaka, Y. Saijoh, H. Hamada, and N. Hirokawa, Abnormal nodal flow precedes situs inversus in iv and inv mice, Molecular Cell, 4 (1999), pp. 459–468.
D.-J. Packard, R. Zheng, and D.C. Turner, Somite pattern regulation in the avian segmental plate mesoderm, Development, 117 (1993), pp. 779–791.
D.S.-J. Packard and A.G. Jacobson, The influence of axial structures on chick somite formation, Dev. Biol., 53 (1976), pp. 36–48.
K.J. Painter, P.K. Maini, and H.G. Othmer, A chemotactic model for the advance and retreat of the primitive streak in avian development, Bull. Math. Biol., 62 (2000). To appear.
I. Palmeirim, D. Henrique, D. Ish-Horowicz, and O. Pourquie, Avian hairy gene expression identifies a molecular clock linked to vertbrate segmentation and somitogenesis, Cell, 91 (1997), pp. 639–648.
E. Palsson and H.G. Othmer, A model for individual and collective cell movement in dictyostelium discoideum, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci, (2000). Submitted.
V. Panin, V. Papayannopoulos, R. Wilson, and K.D. Irvine, Fringe modulates notchligand interactions, Nature, 387 (1997), pp. 908–912.
P. Penner and I. Brick, Acetylcholinesterase and polyingression in the epiblast of the primitive streak chick embryo., Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol., 193 (1984), pp. 234–241.
A.A. Polezhaev, A mathematical model of the mechanism of vertebrate somitic segmentation, Journal of Theoretical Biology, (1992).
—, Mathematical model of segmentation in somitogenesis in vertebrates, Biophysics, 40 (1995), pp. 583–589.
—, Mathematical modelling of the mechanism of vertebrate somitic segmentation, J. Biol. Sys., 3 (1995), pp. 1041–1051.
O. Pourquié, Clocks regulating developmental processes, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 8 (1998), pp. 665–670.
O. Pourquié, Notch around the clock, Curr. Opin. Gen. Dev., 9 (1999), pp. 559–565.
D.R.N. Primmett, W.E. Norris, G.J. Carlson, R.J. Keynes, and C.D. Stern, Periodic segmental anomalies induced by heat shock in the chick embryo are associated with the cell cycle, Development (Cambridge), 105 (1989), pp. 119–130.
D.R.N. Primmett, C.D. Stern, and R.J. Keynes, Heat shock causes repeated segmental anomalies in the chick embryo, Development (Cambridge), 104 (1988), pp. 331–339.
D. Psychoyos and C.D. Stern, Fates and migratory routes of primitive streak cells in the chick embryo. Development (Cambridge), 122 (1996), p. 1523.
—, Restoration of the organizer after radical ablation of hensen’s node and the anterior primitive streak in the chick embryo, Development, 122 (1996), pp. 3263–3273.
G.L. Radice, H. Rayburn, H. Matsunami, K.A. Knudsen, M. Takeichi, and R.O. Hynes, Developmental defects in mouse embryos lacking n-Cadherin, Dev. Biol., 181 (1997), pp. 64–78.
M.N. Roy, V.E. Prince, and R.K. Ho, Heat shock produces periodic somitic disturbances in the zebrafish embryo, Mech. Dev., 85 (1999), pp. 27–34.
S. Schnell and P.K. Maini, Clock and induction model for somitogenesis, Dev. Dyn., 217 (2000), To appear.
G.C. Schoenwolf, Cell movements in the epiblast during gastrulation and neuralation in avian embryoes, in Gastrulation, R. Keller, ed., Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1991, pp. 1–28.
M. Selleck and C. Stern, Fate mapping and cell lineage analysis of hensen’s node in the chick embryo, Development, 112 (1991), pp. 615–626.
—, Formation and Differentiation of Early Embryonic Mesoderm, Plenum Press, New York, 1992, ch. Evidence for stem cells in the mesoderm of Hensen’s node and their role in embryonic pattern formation, pp. 23–31.
S.B. Shah, I. Skromne, C.R. Hume, D.S. Kessler, K.J. Lee, C.D. Stern, and J. Dodd, Misexpression of chick Vgl in the marginal zone induces primitive streak formation, Development (Cambridge), 124 (1997), pp. 5127–5138. Department of Physiology and Cellular Biophysics, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
J.M.W. Slack, From Egg to Embryo. Regional specification in early development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
N. Spratt, Location of org anspecific regions and their relationship to the development of the primitive streak in the early chick blastoderm, J. Exp. Zool., 89 (1942), pp. 69–101.
—, Regression and shortening of the primitive streak in the explanted chick blastoderm., J. Exp. Zool., 104 (1947), pp. 69–100.
—, Some problems and principles of development, Am. Zool., 6 (1966), pp. 215–254.
N. Spratt and H. Haas, Integrative mechanisms in development of the early chick blastoderm. I Regulative potentiality of separate parts, J. Exp. Zool., 145 (1960), pp. 97–137.
C Stern, Gastrulation: Movements, Patterns, and Molecules, Plenum, New York, 1991, ch. Mesodorm formation in the chick embryo revisited., pp. 29–41.
C. Stern and D. Canning, Origin of cells giving rise to mesoderm and endoderm in the chick embryo., Nature, 343 (1990), pp. 273–275.
C.D. Stern, The marginal zone and its contribution to the hypoblast and primitive streak of the chick embryo, Development (Cambridge), 109 (1990), p. 667.
C.D. Stern and R. Bellairs, Mitotic activity during somite segmentation in the early chick embryo, Anat. Embryol. (Berl.), 169 (1984), pp. 97–102.
C.D. Stern, S.E. Fraser, R.J. Keynes, and D.R.N. Primmett, A cell lineage analysis of segmentation in the chick embryo, Development (Cambridge), 104Supplement (1988), pp. 231–244.
A. Streit, K. Lee, I. Woo, C. Roberts, T. Jessell, and C. Stern, Chordin regulates primitive streak development and the stability of induced neural cells, but is not sufficient for neural induction in the chick embryo, Development, 125 (1998), pp. 507–519.
D. Summerbell and M. Maden, Retinole acid, a developmental signalling molecule, Trends in neurosciences (Regular ed.), 13 (1990), pp. 142–147.
P.P.L. Tam and P.A. Trainor, Specification and segmentation of the paraxial mesoderm, Anat. Embryol. (Berl.), 189 (1994), pp. 275–305.
L. Vakaet, Chimeras in Developmental Biology, Academic Press, London, 1984, ch. Early development of birds.
M. Veini and R. Bellairs, Somites in Developing Embryos, vol. 118 of NATO ASI series. Series A, Life sciences, New York: Plenum Press., 1986, ch. Heat shock effects in chick embryos, pp. 135–145.
F. Wachtlet, B. Christ, and H.J. Jacob, Grafting experiments on determination and migratory behaviour of presomitic, somitic and somatopleural cells in avian embryos, Anat. Embryol. (Berl.), 164 (1982), pp. 369–378.
C. Waddington, Induction by the endodrem in birds., Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol., 128 (1933), pp. 502–521.
Y. Wei and T. Mikawa, Formation of the avian primitive streak from spatially restricted blastoderm: evidence for polarized cell division in the elongating streak, Development, 127 (2000), pp. 87–96.
R.G. Weisblat, C.J. Wedeen, and R.G. Kostriken, Evolution of developmental mechanisms: Spatial and temporal modes of rostrocaudal patterning, Curr. Top. Dev. Biol., 29 (1994), pp. 101–134.
O.K. Wilby and D.A. Ede, A model for generating the pattern of cartilage skeletal elements in the embryonic chick limb, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 52 (1975), pp. 199–217.
S. Yuan, D. Darnell, and G. Schoenwolf, Identification of inducing, responding and suppressing regions in an experimental model of notochord formation in avian embryos, Dev. Biol., 172 (1995), pp. 567–584.
—, Mesodermal patterning during avian gastrulation and neurulation: experimental induction of notochord from non-notochordal precursor cells, Dev. Genets., 17 (1995), pp. 38–54.
S. Yuan and G. Schoenwolf, De novo induction of the organizer and formation of the primitive streak in an experimental model of notochord reconstitution in avian embryos, Development, 125 (1998), pp. 201–213.
—, Reconstitution of the organizer is both sufficient and required to reestablish a fully patterned body plan in avian embryos, Development, 126 (1999), pp. 2461–22473.
Y.P. Yuan, J. Schultz, M. Mlodzik, and P. Bork, Secreted fringe-like signalling molecules may be glycosyl-transferases, Cell, 88 (1997), pp. 9–11.
N. Zhang and T. Gridley, Defect in somite formation in lunatic fringe-deficient mice, Nature, 394 (1998), pp. 374–377.
T. Ziv, Y. Shimoni, and E. Mitrani, Activin can generate ectopic axial structures in chick blastoderm expiants, Development, 115 (1992), pp. 689–694.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schnell, S., Painter, K.J., Maini, P.K., Othmer, H.G. (2001). Spatiotemporal Pattern Formation in Early Development: A Review of Primitive Streak Formation and Somitogenesis. In: Maini, P.K., Othmer, H.G. (eds) Mathematical Models for Biological Pattern Formation. The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, vol 121. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0133-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0133-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6524-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0133-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive