Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Ecological Studies ((ECOLSTUD,volume 166))

Abstract

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded that climate changed during the past century, that human activities influenced the changes, and that climate is expected to continue to change in the future (Watson et al. 2002). The different scenarios studied indicate that continued increases in greenhouse gas concentrations will result in temperature increases from 1.4°C to 5.8°C (Houghton et al. 2001). This warming is expected to modify the global hydrologic cycle, resulting in increased winter precipitation at high latitudes, to result in more hot days and fewer cold days, and to change the frequency of droughts and floods, depending on location (Houghton et al. 2001). These predicted changes raise concerns about terrestrial ecosystem productivity, biogeochemical cycling, and the availability of water resources (Kirschbaum and Fischlin 1996; Melillo et al. 1990). As a result, the IPCC Working Group II Third Assessment Report (McCarthy et al. 2001) requested further research on the response of ecosystems to multiple stresses (e.g., increased temperature and drought).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bachelet D, Neilson RP, Lenihan JM, Drapek RJ (2001) Climate change effects on vegetation distribution and carbon budget in the United States. Ecosystems 4:164–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canadell JG, Mooney HA, Baldocchi DD, Berry JA, Ehleringer JR, Field CB, Gower ST, Hollinger DY, Hunt JE, Jackson RB, Running SW, Shaver GR, Steffen W, Trumbore SE, Valentini R, Bond BY (2000) Carbon metabolism of the terrestrial biosphere: A multitechnique approach for improved understanding. Ecosystems 3:115–130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooter EJ, Eder BK, LeDuc SK, Truppi L (1993) General circulation model output for forest climate change research and applications. General Technical Report SE-85. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MB (1989) Lags in vegetation response to greenhouse warming. Clim Change 15:75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan S, Gloor M, Mahlman J, Pacala S, Sarmiento J, Takahashi T, Tans P (1998) A large terrestrial carbon sink in North America implied by atmospheric and oceanic carbon dioxide data and models. Science 282:442–446.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick PH, Adams DB (2000) Water: Tthe potential consequences of climate variability and change for the water resources of the United States. Report of the Water Sector Assessment Team of the National Assessment of the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change, US Global Change Research Program, Washington, District of Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham RL, Turner MG, Dale VH (1990) How increasing CO2 and climate change affect forests. Bioscience 40: 575–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson PJ (2000) Large-scale water manipulations. In Sala OE, Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Howarth RW (Eds) Methods in ecosystem science. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 341–352.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson PJ, Weltzin JF (2000) Drought disturbance from climate change: Response of United States forests. Sci Total Environ 262:205–220.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Xiaosu D (Eds) (2001) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson LR, Prasad AM (2001) Potential changes in tree species richness and forest community types following climate change. Ecosystems 4:186–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce LA, Birdsey R (Eds) (2000) The impact of climate change on America’s forests: A technical document supporting the 2000 USDA Forest Service RPA Assessment. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-59. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ft. Collins, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschbaum MUF, Fischhn A (1996) Climate change impacts on forests. In Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH (eds) Climate change 1995 impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: Scientific-technical analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 95–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS [Eds] (2001) Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability: Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melillo JM, Callaghan TV, Woodward FI, Salati E, and Sinha SK (1990) Effects on ecosystems, In Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ (Eds) Climate change the IPCC scientific assessment. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 282–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney H (1991) Biological response to climate change: An agenda for research. Ecol Appl 1:112–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Assessment Synthesis Team [NAST] (2000) Climate change impacts on the United States: The potential consequences of climate variability and change, US Global Change Research Program, Washington, District of Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson RP, King GA, DeVelice RL, Lenihan J, Marks D, Dolph J, Campbell B, Glick G (1989) Sensitivity of ecological landscapes and regions to global climatic change. EPA-600-3-89-073. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, District of Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overpeck JT, Bartlein PJ, Webb T III (1991) Potential magnitude of future vegetation change in eastern North America: Comparisons with the past. Science 254:692–695.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor J, Post WM (1988) Response of northern forests to CO2-induced climate change. Nature 334:55–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterlund DR (1972) Wildland watershed management, Ronald Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider SH (1989) The greenhouse effect: Science and policy. Science 243:771–781.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shriner DS, Street RB (1998) North America. In Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH, Dokken DJ (Eds) The regional impacts of climate change: An assessment of vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 253–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Shi H, Zhu Z, Foresman T (2001) An assessment of the status of the world’s remaining closed forests. UNEP/DEWA TR 01-2. United Nations Environment Programme, Division of Early Warning and Assessment, Nairobi, Kenya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JB, Tirpak DA (1990) The potential effects of global climate change on the United States. Hemisphere, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith WH (1987) Future of the hardwood forest: Some problems with declines and air quality. In Hay RL, Woods FW, DeSeim H (Eds) Proceedings of the central hardwood forest conference VI., February 24–26, 1997, Knoxville, Tennessee, pp 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon AM (1986) Transient response of forests to CO2-induced climate change: Simulation modeling experiments in eastern North America. Oecologia 68:567–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson RT, Dokken DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden P, Johnson C, Pan J, [Eds] (2002) Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1956) The vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecol Monogr 26:1–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH, Likens GE (1975) The biosphere and man. In Lieth H, Whittaker RH (Eds), Primary productivity of the biosphere. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 305–328.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wigley TML, Briffa KR, Jones PD (1984) Predicting plant productivity and water resources. Nature 312:102–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward FI (1992) Tansley Review No. 41. Predicting plant responses to global environmental change. New Phytol 122:239–251.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hanson, P.J., O’Hara, F.M. (2003). Introduction. In: Hanson, P.J., Wullschleger, S.D. (eds) North American Temperate Deciduous Forest Responses to Changing Precipitation Regimes. Ecological Studies, vol 166. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0021-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0021-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-6506-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4613-0021-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics