Skip to main content

General Sampling Methods for Above-Ground Populations of Soybean Arthropods

  • Chapter
Sampling Methods in Soybean Entomology

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Experimental Entomology ((SSEXP))

Abstract

The methods most commonly used to sample above-ground populations of arthropods in row crops have also been extensively employed in soybean entomology research and surveys. Four of the principal methods are (1) direct observations, (2) ground or beat cloth, (3) sweep net, and (4) vacuum or suction net (usually a D-Vac). Two of these methods, the direct observations and the ground cloth, may approach absolute or direct population estimates for some species. The other two are indirect or relative sampling methods. In general, however, these four methods need proper calibration against reliable absolute sampling techniques that permit conversion of population samples to estimates of density. Two other methods, the absolute sampling techniques most commonly used for soybean arthropods, involve the caging and harvesting of whole plants and the fumigation cage. These methods are based on the exhaustive extraction of individuals from a unit of habitat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bliss, C. I. 1967. Statistics in biology. vol. 1. McGraw Hill, N.Y. 558 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottrell, D. G., and P. L. Adkisson. 1977. Cotton insect pest management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 22: 451–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, W. P., and B. A. Dumas. 1969. Plant-shaking methods for soybean insect survey in Arkansas. pp. 92–94 in Survey methods for some economic insects. USDA ARS 81–31:140 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLong, D. M. 1932. Some problems encountered in the estimation of insect populations by the sweeping method. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 25: 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrick, E. J. 1961. An improved backpack motor fan for suction sampling of insect populations. J. Econ. Entomol. 54: 394–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrick, E. J., E. I. Schlinger, and R. van den Bosch. 1959. A new method for sampling arthropods using a suction collecting machine and modified Berlese funnel separator. J. Econ. Entomol. 52: 1085–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton, F. A., and D. E. Howell. 1957. A comparison of five methods of sampling alfalfa fields for arthropod populations. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 50: 606–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, D. 1970. Sampling as a basis for pest management strategies. Proc. Tall Timbers Conf. Ecol. Anim. Contr. Habitat Manage. 2: 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillhouse, T. L., and H. N. Pitre. 1974. Comparison of sampling techniques to obtain measurements of insect populations on soybeans. J. Econ. Entomol. 67: 411–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M., and C. G. Helm. 1979. Soybean leaf pubescence and the relative abundance and injury levels of the potato leafhopper, Empoasca fabae. (In preparation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M., W. G. Ruesink, and K. McDowell. 1974. Spatial and temporal distribution patterns of the bean leaf beetle, Cerotoma trifurcata (Forster), on soybeans in Illinois. Environ. Entomol. 3: 607–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M., G. P. Waldbauer, C. E. Eastman, and C. G. Helm. 1979. Absolute estimates of bean leaf beetle adult populations on soybean. (In preparation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kretzschmar, G. P. 1948. Soybean insects in Minnesota with special reference to sampling techniques. J. Econ. Entomol. 41: 568–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, T. F., D. Gonzalez, and R. van den Bosch. 1970. A sampling device for estimating absolute insect populations in cotton. J. Econ. Entomol. 63: 1704–1706.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeSar, C. D., and J. D. Unzicker. 1978. Soybean spiders: Species composition, population densities, and vertical distribution. Ill. Natur. Hist. Surv. Biol. Notes 107: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, N. L., C. E. Morgan, G. D. Thomas, and C. M. Ignoffo. 1976. Evaluation of four techniques for sampling soybean insects. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 49: 389–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayse, M. A., M. Kogan, and P. W. Price. 1978a. Sampling abundance of soybean arthropods: Comparison of methods. J. Econ. Entomol. 71: 135–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayse, M. A., P. W. Price, and M. Kogan. 1978b. Sampling methods for arthropod colonization studies in soybean. Can. Entomol. 110: 265–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menhinick, E. F. 1963. Estimation of insect population density in herbaceous vegetation with emphasis on removal sweeping. Ecology 44: 617–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedigo, L. P., G. L. Lentz, J. G. Stone, and D. F. Cox. 1972. Green cloverworm populations in Iowa soybeans with special reference to sampling procedure. J. Econ. Entomol. 65: 414–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieters, E. P., and W. L. Sterling. 1973. Comparison of sampling techniques for cotton arthropods in Texas. Texas Agr. Exp. Sta. Misc. Publ. 1120: 8 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruesink, W. G., and D. L. Haynes. 1973. Sweep net sampling for the cereal leaf beetle, Oulema melanopus. Environ. Entomol. 2: 161–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruesink, W. G., and M. Kogan. 1975. The quantitative basis of pest management: Sampling and measuring. pp. 309–351 in R. L. Metcalf and W. H. Luckmann, eds. Introduction to insect pest management. John Wiley and Sons, N.Y. 587 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romney, V. E. 1945. The effect of physical factors upon catch of the beet leafhopper (Eutettix tenellus (Baker)) by a cylinder and two sweep net methods. Ecology 26: 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, W. G., and R. L. Jensen. 1977. Sweep net and ground cloth sampling for insects in soybeans. J. Econ. Entomol. 70: 301–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, M., and G. R. Career. 1976. Distribution of insects in soybean fields. Can. Entomol. 108: 767–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, M., G. R. Carver, and S. G. Turnipseed. 1974. A comparison of three sampling methods for arthropods in soybeans. Environ. Entomol. 3: 22–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood, T. R. E. 1978. Ecological methods. Halsted Press, N.Y. 524 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnipseed, S. G. 1974. Sampling soybean insects by various D-Vac, sweep, and ground cloth methods. Fla. Entomol. 57: 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F. 1965. Sampling methods for censuses and surveys. 3rd ed., Imp. Charles Griffin and Co., London, 440 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. H., E. K. Johnson, and R. G. Price. 1976. Sampling cotton and other field crops for insects. Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. B-723:10 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kogan, M., Pitre, H.N. (1980). General Sampling Methods for Above-Ground Populations of Soybean Arthropods. In: Kogan, M., Herzog, D.C. (eds) Sampling Methods in Soybean Entomology. Springer Series in Experimental Entomology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-9998-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-9998-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-8069-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-9998-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics