Skip to main content

Pesticides, pesticide residues, tolerances, and the law (U.S.A.)

  • Conference paper
Residue Reviews / Rückstands-Berichte

Part of the book series: Residue Reviews ((RECT,volume 35))

Abstract

Until the latter part of the 1950–1960 decade, pesticide, residue, and tolerance (the last two terms in the connotative sense of pesticides) were words primarily limited to the vocabulary of those involved in agricultural pursuits and small groups of specialists within the confines of the University academe. Similarly, the 1947 Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (U.S. Department of Agriculture 1964) and the Miller Bill (Pesticide Chemicals Amendment) of 1954 and the Food Additives Amendment of 1958 to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (1967) were of primary interest only to the agriculturist, food processor, and chemical manufacturer.1

Hawaiian Agriculture Experiment Station, Journal Series No. 1230.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anonymous: Use of Pesticides. A report of the President’s science advisory committee. The White House, Washington, D.C., May 15 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: The regulation of pesticides in the United States, Part II. N.A.C. News and Pesticide Review 26, 12 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: Control of pesticide residues in foods—Industry guidelines. F.D.A. Publication No. 59, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D.C. (1969a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: Pesticide residues in food. Technical Report Series No. 417, WHO, Geneva (1969b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: PHS’ pesticides program. N.A.C. News and Pesticide Review 27, 10 (1969c).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: Report of the Secretary’s Commission on pesticides and their relationship to environmental health, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, D.C. (1969d).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: Announcement on 2,4,5-T actions. Executive office of the President, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, D.C., Oct. 29 (1969e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: Major curbs pending on use of DDT. Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Nov. 12 (1969f).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: Box score on pesticide legislation. Farm Chemicals 132, 24 (1969g).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: Government and your business. Farm Chemicals 133, 10 (1970a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: DDT in limelight. Farm Chemicals 133, 76 (1970b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: Use of herbicides restricted. Honolulu Star-Bulletin, Apr. 15 (1970c).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous: Pesticides. Successful Farming 68(4), 7 (1970d).

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Official Agricultural Chemists: Official methods of anlysis, Tenth ed. Washington, D.C. (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, J. A. R.: Pesticide legislation: The need for liaison. Span 12, 99 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Science: FDA guidelines for chemistry and residue data; requirements of pesticide petitions. FDA, HEW, Washington, D.C. (Mar. 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, Rachel: Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers,L.: Chemical methods of pest control. Manufacturing Chemist and Aerosol News 41, 17 (1970).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chemical and Engineering News: DDT: HEW sets tolerance. 47, 17, Apr. 28 (1969a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemical and Engineering News: Environment: An eye on the council. 47, 15, June 9 (1969b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemical and Engineering News: No total ban on DDT use. 47, 11, Nov. 17 (1969c).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemical and Engineering News: Details on the government’s curb on use of DDT. 47, 27, Dec. 1 (1969d).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemical and Engineering News: Food additives would be redefined and the Delaney amendment expanded. 48, 23, Jan. 5 (1970a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemical and Engineering News: Six chemical companies are contesting agriculture’s curb on certain uses of DDT. 48, 31, Jan. 12 (1970b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemical and Engineering News: Pace quickens for DDT restrictions. 48, 32, Jan. 26 (1970c).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemical and Engineering News: HEW, USDA hold firm; 2,4,5-T ruling postponed. 48, 11, Feb. 16 (1970d).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemical and Engineering News: Regulations for enforcement of FIFRA. Title 7, Chapt. III, part 362.2g, Aug. 29 (1964a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chemical and Engineering News: Interpretation of terms included in definition of economic poisons. Title 7, Chapt. III, part 362, Nov. (1964b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Code of Federal Regulations: Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, GSA, Washington, D.C. (1969a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Code of Federal Regulations: Tea Importation Act. Title 21, subchapt. E, part 281, Jan. (1969b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Defense Documentation Center: Assessment of ecological effects of extensive or repeated use of herbicides: Final report. Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eighty-Eighth Congress: Interagency coordination in environmental hazards (pesticides). Hearings before the subcommittee on reorganization and international organizations of the committee on government operations United States Senate; first session part I. Washington, D.C. (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eighty-Ninth Congress: Pesticides and public policy. Report of the Committee on Government operations United States Senate; Report No. 1379. Second session. Washington, D.C. July 21 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: As amended U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D.C. Reprinted Mar. (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register: Tolerances and exemptions from tolerances for pesticide chemicals in or on raw agricultural commodities, 32, F.R. 4059, Mar. 15 (1967a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register: Ethion. 32, F.R. 9066, June 27 (1967b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register: Zero tolerances. 33, F.R. 6653, May 1 (1968a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register: Definitions and interpretations. 33, F.R. 11207, par. 121.1, Aug. 8 (1968b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register: Pesticide chemicals in processed foods. 33, F.R. 11207, par. 121.2, Aug. 8 (1968c).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register: Dalapon sodium salt; tolerances for residues. 33, F.R. 12041, Aug. 24 (1968d).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register: Definitions and interpretations. 34, F.R. 12434, par. 120.1, July 30 (1969a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register: Definitions and interpretations. 34, F.R. 17106, par. 120.1, Oct. 22 (1969 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register: Pesticides. Interdepartmental agreement for protection of public health and quality of environment. 35, F.R. 4014, Mar. 3 (1970 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register: Food additive, status opinion letters; statement of policy. 35, F.R. 5810, par. 121.11, Apr. 9 (1970 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukukita, Y: Tea cult of Japan. Japan Travel Bureau, Tokyo (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukunga, K., and Y. Tsukano: Pesticide regulations and residue problems in Japan. Residue Reviews 26, 1 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, W. B.: Danger! Pesticides at work. Good Housekeeping, p. 82, Mar. (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerritz, H. W.: Tea imports. Private communication (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunther, F. A.: Instrumentation in pesticide residue determinations. Adv. Pest Control Research, 5,191 (1962).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gunther, F. A.: Insecticide residues in California citrus fruits and products. Residue Reviews 28, 1 (1969 a).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gunther, F. A.: Current status of pesticide residue methodology. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 160, 72 (1969b).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gunther, F. A., and R. C. Blinn: Analysis of insecticides and Acaricides. New York-London: Interscience (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunther, F. A., and J. D. Gunther (Eds.): Residue Reviews. New York-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. A series beginning in 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T. H., and J. G. Cummings: Enforcement of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act in the United States. Residue Reviews 6, 104(1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J. R. M. , B. M. Ulland, M. G. Valerio, L. Petrucelli, L. Fishbein, E. R. Hart, A. J. Pallotta,R. R. Battes,H. L. Falk,J. J. Gart, M. Klein, I. Mitchell, and J. Peters: Bioassay of pesticides and industrial chemicals for tumorigenicity in mice: A preliminary note. J. U.S. Nat. Cancer Inst. 42, 1101 (1969).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, R. L., Ed.: Advances in Pest Control Research. New York-London: Interscience. A series beginning in 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences: Report of the pesticide residues committee. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., June (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ninety-First Congress: Deficiencies in administration of Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. Hearings before a subcommittee of committee on government operations, House of Representatives, 1st session, Washington, D.C., May 7 and June 24 (1969a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ninety-First Congress: Deficiencies in administration of Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. Eleventh report by the committee on government operations, 1st session, House Report No. 91–637. Washington, D.C., Nov. 13 (1969b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, D. B.: The importance of pesticides in Indian food production. Proc. Royal Soc., London, B Ser. 167, 145 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Resources Agency: Report on pesticides in California. State of California, Sacramento, Calif., Jan. 1 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrman, D. F.: Pesticide laws and legal implications of pesticide use. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, CDC, Atlanta, Ga. (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechter, M. S., and W. E. Westlake: Chemical residues and the analytical chemist. Anal. Chem. 34, 25A (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, I: Japanese laws and regulations concerned with pesticide and food-additive residues in foodstuffs. Residue Reviews 4, 9 (1963).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swift, J. E.: To those interested in agricultural production and pesticide problems in California. Agricultural Extension Service, University of California, Berkeley, Calif., Aug. 26 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture: Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, Washington, D.C., Oct. 1 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture: Summary of registered agricultural pesticide chemical uses. Vols. I, II, and III. Pesticide Regulation Division, Agricultural Research Service (1969a).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture: Report of committee on persistent pesticides, Division of Biology and Agriculture, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., May (1969b).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture: Proposed cancellation of registration of certain products. PR Notice 70–4, ARS, PRD, Washington, D.C., Feb. 26 (1970a).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture: Suspension of registration for products containing Alkyl mercury bearing directions for use as seed treatments. PR Notice 70–7, ARS, PRD, Washington, D.C., Mar. 9 (1970b).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture: Status Report on 2,4,5-T. Agricultural Chemical Notes No. 70–2, Federal Extension Service, Washington, D.C., Feb. (1970c).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture: Suspension of certain 2,4,5-T uses. Agricultural Chemical Notes No. 70–3, Federal Extension Service, Washington, D.C., Apr. (1970d).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture: Nor-Am Agricultural Products, Inc. and Morton International, Inc., plaintiffs vs C. M. Hardin, G. W. Irving, Jr. and H. W. Hays, Civil No. 70 C 838, U.S. District Court, N. District of 111., Apr. 21 (1970 e).

    Google Scholar 

  • University of California: Proceedings of fourth conference on the use of agricultural chemicals. Division of Agricultural Sciences, Davis, Calif., Feb. 8 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, T.: Defoliation. The New Yorker, p. 1, Feb. 7 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, J., chairman: Effects, uses, control, and research of agricultural pesticides. Hearing before a subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives, on USDA appropriations for 1966. Reprint National Agricultural Chemicals Association, Washington, D.C. (1966).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1971 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bevenue, A., Kawano, Y. (1971). Pesticides, pesticide residues, tolerances, and the law (U.S.A.). In: Gunther, F.A. (eds) Residue Reviews / Rückstands-Berichte. Residue Reviews, vol 35. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-9812-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-9812-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9814-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-9812-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics