R.A. Fisher: Some Introductory Remarks
R.A. Fisher was without question a genius. He brought statistical science from a collectior of poorly understood, albeit useful, techniques toward a cohesive well-founded discipline. Along the way his strongly-held scientific views and somewhat difficult personality led to disputes, in some of which he was undoubtedly wrong. In almost no avenue of statistical science did he pursue ideas so exhaustively as to leave clear, unambiguous material. His strengths were intuition and inspiration, he spurned mathematical nit-picking. Compared to many of his contemporaries, his writing now appears lucid and surprisingly modern. However, much of Fisher’s work is difficult, at times even exasperating, because of untied loose ends that are important to detailed understanding. In addition, many statistical results of practical importance were developed under Fisher’s initial guidance, by junior colleagues such as Frank Yates.
KeywordsStatistical Science Royal Statistical Society Junior Colleague Mathematical Intuition Astronomy Journal
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barnard, E.A. (1963). “Fisher’s Contributions to Mathematical Statistics,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 126, 162–6.Google Scholar
- Box, Joan (19 78). R.A. Fisher, The Life of a Scientist. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Soper, H.E., A.W. Young, B.M. Cave, A. Lee, and K. Pearson (1917). “On the Distribution of the Correlation Coefficient in Small Samples. A Cooperative Study,” Biometrika, 11, 328–413.Google Scholar
- “Student” (1908). “The Probable Error of a Mean,” Biometrika, 6, 1–25.Google Scholar