Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Statistics ((LNS,volume 6))

  • 164 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we shall study multiple decision procedures in terms of hypotheses-testing problems. First, we discuss the conditional confidence approach of Kiefer which can be used to improve Neyman-Pearson (NP) formulation. This is done in Section 6.2. Using this approach, we describe conditional selection procedures and their relation with classical selection rules. Later, we discuss the theory of multiple comparisons for some appropriate alternative hypotheses. In Section 6.3, we consider an optimal criterion to improve the power of the individual test. Using this approach, we derive selection rules based on tests. Multiple range tests are studied in Section 6.4. A discussion of the multistage comparison procedures is provided in Section 6.5.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bechhofer, R. E. (1954). A single-sample multiple decision procedure for ranking means of normal populations with known variances. Ann. Math. Statist. 25, 16–39.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Brownie, C. and Kiefer, J. (1977). The ideas of conditional confidence in the simplest setting. Comm. Statist.-Theor. Meth. A6(8), 691–751.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F-tests. Biometrics 11, 1–42.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunnett, C. W. (1970). Multiple comparisons. Statistics in Endocrinology, Ed. J. W. McArthur and T. Colton, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Einot, I. and Gabriel, K. R. (1975). A study of the powers of several methods of multiple comparisons. JASA 70, 574–583.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gupta, S. S. (1956). On a decision rule for a problem in ranking means. Inst. Statist. Mimeo. Ser. No. 150, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta, S. S. and Huang, D. Y. (1975). On subset selection procedures for Poisson populations and some applications to multinomial selection problems. Applied Statistics (Gupta, R. P. Ed.), North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta, S. S., Huang, D. Y. and Huang, W. T. (1976). On ranking and selection procedures and tests of homogeneity for binomial populations. Essays in Probability and Statistics (Eds. S. Ikeda et al), Shinko Tsusho Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, 501–533.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta, S. S. and Huang, D. Y. (1977). Some multiple decision problems in analysis of variance. Comm. Statist. A-Theory Methods 6, 1035–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta, S. S. and Nagel, K. (1971). On some contributions to multiple decision theory. Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics (Gupta, S. S. and Yackel, J.), Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta, S. S. and Wong, W. Y. (1976). On subset selection procedures for Poisson processes and some applications to the binomial and multinomial problems. Operations Research XXIII (R. H. Karlsruhe, Ed.)» Verlag Anton Hain Meisenhem Am Glan.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hartley, H. 0. (1955). Some recent developments in analysis of variance. Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 8, 47–72.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Holm, S. A. (1977). Sequentially rejective multiple test procedures. Report 1977-1, Univ. of Umea, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Holm, S. A. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Statist. 6, 65–70.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Holm, S. A. (1980). A stagewise directional test based on T statistics. Report, Chalmers Univ. of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keuls, M. (1952). The use of the “studentized range” in connection with an analysis of variance. Euphytica 1, 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiefer, J. (1975). Conditional confidence approach in multidecision problems. Proc. 4th Dayton Multivariate Conf. ed. P. R. Krishnaiah, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co., 143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kiefer, J. (1976). Admissibility of conditional confidence procedures. Ann. Math. Statist. 4, 836–865.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kiefer, J. (1977). Conditional confidence statements and confidence estimators (With comments). JASA 72, 789–827.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Lehmann, E. L. (1957). A theory of some multiple decision problems I II. Ann. Math. Statist. 28, 1–25, 547–572.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Lehmann, E. L. and Shaffer, J. P. (1977). On a fundamental theorem in multiple comparisons. JASA 72, 576–578.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Lehmann, E. L. and Shaffer, J. P. (1979). Optimum significance levels for multistage comparison procedures. Ann. Statist. 7, 27–45.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Marcus, R., Peritz, E. and Gabriel, K. R. (1976). On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 63, 655–660.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller, R. G. Jr. (1966). Simultaneous Statistical Inference. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller, R. G. Jr. (1977). Developments in multiple comparisons. JASA 72, 779–788.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Newman, D. (1939). The distribution of the range in samples from the normal population, expressed in terms of an independent estimate of standard deviation. Biometrika 31, 20–30.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Neil, R. and Watherill, G. B. (1971). The present state of multiple comparison methods. J. Roy. Statist. Ser. В 33, No. 2, 218, 250.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roy, S. N. and Bose, R. C. (1953). Simultaneous confidence interval estimation. Ann. Math. Statist. 24, 513–536.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Ryan, T. A. (1959). Multiple comparisons in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin 56, 26–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shaffer, J. P. (1978). Control of directional errors with stagewise multiple test procedures. Accepted for publication in the Ann. Statist.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Spjøtvol, E. (1972). On the optimality of some multiple comparison procedures. Ann. Math. Statist. 43, 398–411.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Spjøtvol, E. (1974). Multiple testing in the analysis of variance. Scand J. Statist. 1, No. 3, 97–114.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Tukey, J. W. (1953). The problem of multiple comparisons. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gupta, S.S., Huang, DY. (1981). Multiple Decision Procedures Based on Tests. In: Multiple Statistical Decision Theory: Recent Developments. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol 6. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5925-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5925-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-90572-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5925-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics