Skip to main content

Research Reciprocity Rather than Informed Consent in Fieldwork

  • Chapter
The Ethics of Social Research

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Social Psychology ((SSSOC))

Abstract

Anthropological research does not have subjects. We work with informants in an atmosphere of trust and mutual respect. (Mead, 1969, p. 371)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Booth, C. Labour and life of the people. London, William and Norgate, 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, C. Life and labour of the peoplein London. London, Macmillan, 1902–1903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casagrande, J. In the company of man: Twenty portraits by anthropologists. New York: Harper & Row, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, J. Risk and benefit to subjects of fieldwork. The American Sociologist, 1978, 13, 134–143.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, J. Ethical principles for conducting fieldwork. American Anthropologist, 1980, 82, 28–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon, N. Yanomamo: The fierce people. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. Comment on “initial interaction of newcomers in Alcoholics Anonymous.’’ Social Problems, 1961, 8, 364–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. On the ethics of disguised observation. Social Problems, 1968, 15, 502–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, G. From anxiety to method in the behavioral sciences. New York: Humanities, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Crandall, R. Ethics in social and behavioral research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollard, J. Caste and class in a southern town. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. Investigative social research. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, W. E. B. The Philadelphia Negro: A social study. New York: Schocken, 1899/1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, W. E. B. My evolving program for Negro freedom. In R. E. Logan (Ed.), What the Negro wants. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, J.-P. The headman and I: Ambiguity and ambivalence in the fleldworking experience. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R. T. Prefatory note, pp. vii–viii, in Göhre (1895).

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmett, D. Three strands in morality. In Mackenzie, M. J. M. Political questions: Essays in honour of M. J. M. Mackenzie. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, K. T. A comment on disguised observation in sociology. Social Problems, 1967, 14, 366–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galliher, J. F. The protection of human subjects: A reexamination of the professional code of ethics. American Sociologists, 1973, 8, 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliher, J. F. Looking upward meekly. Social Problems, 1980, 27, 298–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göhre, P. Three months in a workshop: A practical study (A. B. Carr, trans.). London: Swann Sonnenschein, 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 1960, 25, 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, J. On ethics and anthropology. Current Anthropology, 1971, 12, 231–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, F. The participant-observer technique in small communities. American Journal of Sociology, 1940, 46, 331–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leacock, E. B., & Lurie, N. O. (Eds.). North American Indians in historical perspective. New York: Random House, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. Les structures élémentaires de la parenté. Paris: Presses Universitaires, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. A short history of ethics. New York: MacMillan, 1966.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. New York: Dutton, 1922/1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. The sexual life of savages in North-western Melanesia. New York: Harvest, 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. Essai sur le don, forme achäique de l’échange. Trans. by I. Cunnison as The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in Archaic societies. New York: Norton, 1925/1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. Research with human beings: A model derived from anthropological field practice. Daedelus, 1969, 98, 361–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muggeridge, K., & Adam, R. Beatrice Webb: A life, 1858–1943. New York: Knopf, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. et al. An American dilemma. New York: Harper& Row, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, F. W. The ethical demands of the Belmont Report. In C. B. Klockars & F. W. O’Connor (Eds.), Deviance and decency: The ethics of research with human subjects. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfautz, H. (Ed.). Charles Booth on the city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powdermaker, H. After freedom: A cultural study of the Deep South. New York: Viking, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powdermaker, H. Stranger and friend: The way of an anthropologist. New York: Norton, 1967/1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, R. The Little Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, J. Comments on secret observation. Social Problems, 1962, 9, 283–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. Exkurs über Treue und Dankbarkeit (Note on Faithfulness and Gratitude). In K. H. Wolff (trans.), Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1950. (Originally published in Soziologie, Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergessellschaftung (Sociology, studies of the forms of sociation)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siskind, J. To hunt in the morning. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wax, M.L. Tenting with Malinowski. American Sociological Review, 1972, 37, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wax, M. L., & Wax, R. H. Fieldwork and the research process. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 1980, 11, 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wax, R. H. Reciprocity as a field technique. Human Organization, 1952, 11, 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wax, R. H. Doing fieldwork: Warnings and advice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, B. Pages from a work-girl’s diary. Nineteenth Century, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S., & Webb, B. P. Methods of social study. New York: Longman’s Green, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, A. B. Women of value, men of renown: New perspectives on Trobriand exchange. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum. (2nd ed. with appendix on fieldwork). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wax, M.L. (1982). Research Reciprocity Rather than Informed Consent in Fieldwork. In: Sieber, J.E. (eds) The Ethics of Social Research. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5722-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5722-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-5724-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5722-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics