Advertisement

The Opponent Processes in Acquired Motivation

  • Richard L. Solomon

Abstract

Mammals come equipped with a variety of species-specific motivation systems. With amazingly little experience, they appropriately eat food, drink liquids, become fearful in the presence of predators, or copulate with conspecifics. The stimuli that control such behaviors are decidedly different from species to species, but these differences are relatively independent of the widely differing life histories of the individual con-specifics. The controlling stimuli, as Epstein (Chapter 7, this volume) has so lucidly pointed out, may function as releasers of fixed action patterns or as elicitors of reflexes or as arousers of affect. If they are arousers of affect, they have a motivational function; they induce affective states that energize large arrays of behavior and create the conditions for what the psychologist calls reinforcement. If they merely elicit fixed action patterns or reflexes without affect, they have no motivational significance: They do not create persisting affective states, and they sometimes will have no capacity to reinforce behaviors. Epstein has described examples of motivating and nonmotivating stimuli that can control innately organized behaviors.

Keywords

Affective Reaction Shock Termination Morphine Tolerance Opponent Process Hedonic Tone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, J. S. Motivation. In E. Hearst (Ed.), The first century of experimental psychology. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Church, R.M., LoLordo, V., Overmier, J. B., Solomon, R. L., & Turner, L. H. Cardiac responses to shock in curarized dogs: Effects of shock intensity and duration, warning signal, and prior experience with shock. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1966, 62, 1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dethier, V. G. The hungry fly. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. Grevert, P., & Goldstein, A. Endorphins: Naloxone fails to alter experimental pain or mood in humans. Science, 1978, 199, 1093–1095.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hendry, D. P. Conditioned reinforcement. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  6. Hoffman, H. S., Eiserer, L. A., Ratner, A. M., & Pickering, V. L. The development of distress vocalization during withdrawal of an imprinting stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1974, 86, 563–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Katcher, A. H., Solomon, R. L., Turner, L. H., LoLordo, V. M., Overmier, J. B., & Rescorla, R. A. Heart-rate and blood pressure responses to signaled and unsignaled shocks: Effects of cardiac sympathectomy. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969, 68, 163–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Maier, S. F., Seligman, M. E. P., & Solomon, R. L. Pavlovian fear conditioning and learned helplessness. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.Google Scholar
  9. Rosellini, R. A., & Lashley, R. L. 1980. An opponent-process theory of motivation, VIII: Pellet preference and adjunctive behavior. Learning Motivation, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. Schull, J. I. Pain, pleasure and the effects of opiate receptor blockade in humans. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1980.Google Scholar
  11. Seaman, S. F. Dose size and interdose interval effects on morphine tolerance in the rat. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, 1980.Google Scholar
  12. Solomon, R. L. The opponent-process theory of acquired motivation. American Psychologist, 1980, 35, 691–712.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Solomon, R. L., & Corbit, J. D. An opponent-process theory of motivation, II: Cigarette addiction. Journal of A bnormal Psychology, 1973, 81, 158–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Starr, M. D. An opponent-process theory of motivation, VI: Time and intensity variables in the development of separation-induced distress calling in ducklings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1978, 4, 338–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard L. Solomon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations