Abstract
With few exceptions, most philosophers who present papers debating the moral status of animals in society and the pros and cons of giving animals certain rights, reflect, as one would expect, a classically occidental world view: an anthropocentric view that, as I see it, is not equipped to deal with the complex interfaces between human and nonhuman animals and the environment. Some knowledge of animal behavior and ecology is a prerequisite for anyone who wishes to discuss objectively and accurately, the question of animal rights. Also some knowledge of Eastern philosophy (see later) and the phenomenological approach of Merleau-Ponty (as reviewed by Dallery, 1978) would considerably reduce such anthropocentrism and help close the philosophical gap between reality, humankind, and nature.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 The HUMANA Press Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fox, M.W. (1983). Philosophy, Ecology, Animal Welfare, and the ‘Rights’ Question. In: Miller, H.B., Williams, W.H. (eds) Ethics and Animals. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5623-6_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5623-6_21
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-0-89603-053-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5623-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive