Advertisement

The M.I.T. Bag Model in the Context of QCD

  • K. Johnson
Chapter
Part of the Progress in Physics book series (PMP, volume 8)

Abstract

The M.I.T. Bag Model (1, 2) has been generally successful in giving a simple and quantitative account of the quark structure of hadrons. It is not the purpose of this talk to recount the successes or short comings of the bag model. Instead, I will try to motivate the development of a possible “derivation” of the model from the fundamental theory of strong interactions, that is, from Quantum Chromodynamics.

Keywords

Wave Function Light Quark Operator Product Expansion Casimir Energy Massless Quark 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.)
    A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, C. B. Thorn, Phys. Rev. D10, 2599 (1974); T. DeGrand, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, J. Kiskis, Phys. Rev. D12, 2060 (1975).Google Scholar
  2. 2.)
    For a recent review see J. Donoghue, C. DeTar; Annual Review of Nuclear Science and Particle Science, Vol. 33 (1983).Google Scholar
  3. 3.)
    E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B160, 57 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.)
    Some references to related calculations are H. B. 6. Casimir, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. B51, 793 (1948); K. A. Milton, Phys. Rev. D22, 1441 (1980); C. Peterson, T. H. Hansson, K. Johnson, Phys. Rev. D26, 415 (1982); K. A. Milton, Phys. Rev. D27, 439 (1983).Google Scholar
  5. 5.)
    T. H. Hansson, K. Johnson, C. Peterson, Phys. Rev. D26, 2069 (1982).Google Scholar
  6. 6.)
    There are many references to the UA(1) problen. For closely related work see M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainstein, V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B147, 385, 448 (1979); S. Narison, Phys. Letters, 125B, 501 (1983), and other references contained therein.Google Scholar
  7. 7.)
    R. Jackiw, C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 172 (1976); C. G. Callan, R. F. Dashen, D. J. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63B, 334 (1976); For a pedagogical discussion of “θ” see “Quarks Leptons & Gauge Fields”, K. Huang, WORLD SCIENTIFIC. Singapore (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.)
    V. A. Novikov, M., A. Shifman, A.I. Vainstein, V. I. Zakharov,Nucl. Phys. Bl91, 301 (1981).Google Scholar
  9. 9.)
    C. Carlson, T. H. Hansson, C. Peterson, Phys. Rev. D27. 1556 (1983); T. H. Hansson, private communication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston, Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Theoretical Physics and Laboratory of Nuclear ScienceMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations