Advertisement

Analytic Regularization and Renormalization of Nonperturbation Theories

  • H. C. Lee
  • M. S. Milgram
Part of the Progress in Physics book series (PMP, volume 8)

Abstract

Quantum field theories suffer from infinities. In perturbation theories, these infinities manifest themselves as ultraviolet (UV) divergences in Feynman integrals. In massless theories, there are also Infrared (IR) divergences to contend with. In perturbation expansion, the order-by-order removal of these infinities - the renormalization program1) - is well understood. The program has been tremendously simplified since the advent of dimensional regularization2, 3), a technique whereby the infinities are analytically isolated as poles in the complex ω-plane, where 2ω is the generalized dimension of Euclidean space-time. For nonperturbatlon theories, a general and viable renormalization procedure has not yet been devised. The problem with which we shall be concerned here is the regularization and renormalization of a nonperturbatlon theory as represented by the nonlinear equations derived from it. We will describe a technique that should allow one to analytically regulate and ultimately renormalize the equation.

Keywords

Gluon Propagator Feynman Integral Divergent Integral Axial Gauge Massless Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    For reviews: E.S. Abers and B.W. Lee, Phys. Rep. 9C(1973)1; P. Ramond, “Field Theory”(Benjanln/Cunnings, Reading, Massachusetts, 1981 ).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. ’tHooft and M. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. B44(1972)189.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    For reviews: C. Lelbbrandt, Rad. Mod. Phys. 47(1975)849; S. Xarlson, Phys. Rep. 84(1982)263.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.S. Ball and P. Zacharlasen, Nucl. Phys. B143(1978)148;S. Mandelstam, Phys. Rev. D20(1979)3223; R. Delbourgo, J. Phys. C. 5(1979)603; J.K. Cornwall, Pnys. Rev. D26(1982)1453; A.I. Alekaeev, Teor. Hat. Fir. 48(1981)324; M. Baker, J.S. Ball and F. Zacharlasen, Nucl. Phys. 6186(1981)531,560; W.J. Shoennaker, Nucl. Phys. B194(1982)535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    See also talks by J. Ball and by P. Johnson In these Proceedings.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Delbourgo, A. Salan and J. Strathdee, Nuovo Claento 23A(1974)237; W. Konetschny and W. Kuumer, Nucl. Phys. B100(1975)106.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.S. DeWitt, Phys. Rev. 162(1967)1195; L.D. Faddeev and V.N. Popov, Phys. Lett. 75B75B(1967)29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    e.g., D.M. Capper and G. Lelbbrandt, Phys. Rev. D25(1982)1002,1009; U.L. van Neerven, Z. Phys. C14(1982)241; W. Konetschny, preprint, Tech. U. Ui.cn (March, 1983 ).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H.C. Lee and M.S. Mllgram, preprint CRNL-83-III-03 (to be published).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Luke, “Hie Special Functions and their Approximations”, ( Academic Press, New York, 1969 ) Chapter 5.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Kumner, Acta. Phys. Aust. 41(1975)315.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rei. 4 and J.S. Ball, private coaaunlcatlon.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.I. Alekseev, ref. 4; W.J. Shoennaker, ref. 4.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Strubbe, Conp. Phys. Conn. 8(1974)1.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.S. Mllgran and H.C. Lee (to be published).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M.S. Hllgraoo and H.C. Lee (In preparation).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Boston, Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. C. Lee
    • 1
  • M. S. Milgram
    • 1
  1. 1.Chalk River Nuclear LaboratoriesAtomic Energy of Canada LimitedChalk RiverCanada

Personalised recommendations