Abstract
Every theory both depends upon and attempts to explain a particular set of facts or observations. It seems fair, for example, to say that Hobbes considered a deformed person or someone slipping on a wet street as crucial for his theory of humor and that Bergson had something like a marionette or a jack-in-the-box in mind. Kant saw the unexpected denouement of a clever comic remark as crucial whereas Freud openly admitted that, for the case of sexual humor at least, he was thinking about a smutty joke told by men of breeding in the presence (either real or imagined) of a lady of breeding. Each theorist started from a different reference point and the specific nature of these starting points has served to provide each theory with its own unique orientation and assumptions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ambrose, A. J. The development of the smiling response in early infancy. In B. Foss (Ed.), Determinants of infant behavior. New York: Wiley, 1961.
Berger, P. L., and Luckmann, T. The social construction of reality. New York: Anchor Books, 1966.
Bergson, H. Laughter: An essay on the meaning of the comic. New York: Millan, 1956. (Originally published 1911.)
Bowlby, J. Attachment and loss. New York: Basic Books, 1969.
Deckers, L., and Kizer, P. A note on weight discrepancy and humor. Journal of Psychology, 1974, 86, 309–312.
Fisher, S., and Fisher, R. Pretend the world is funny and forever. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1981.
Freud, S. Jokes and their relation to the unconscious. New York: Norton, 1960. (Originally published, 1905.)
Goldstein, K. The smiling of the infant and the problem of understanding the “other.” Journal of Psychology, 1957, 44, 175–191.
Gruner, C. R. Understanding laughter: The workings of wit and humor. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1978.
Hobbes, T. Leviathan. New York: Dutton, 1914. (Originally published, 1651.)
James, W. The principles of psychology. New York: Dover, 1950. (Originally published, 1890.)
Kagan, J. Change and continuity in infancy. New York: Wiley, 1971.
Keith-Spiegel, P. Early conceptions of humor: Varieties and issues. In J. H. Goldstein and P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Koestler, A. The act of creation. London: Hutchinson, 1964.
Lewin, K. A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1935.
Lewin, K. Field theory in social science. New York: Harper, 1951.
Mougall, W. Why do we laugh? Scribners, 1922, 71, 359–363.
McGhee, P. E. Humor: Its origin and development. San Francisco: Freeman, 1979.
Mindess, H. Laughter and liberation. Los Angeles: Nash, 1971.
Murphy, B., and Pollio, H. R. The many faces of humor. Psychological Record, 1975, 25, 545–558.
Nerhardt, G. Humor and inclination to laugh: Emotional reactions to stimuli of different divergence from a range of expectancy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1970, 11, 185–195.
Nowicki, D. R. Smiling and laughing in human infancy: A naturalistic perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Tennessee, 1977.
Plessner, H. Laughing and crying. Evanston, III: Northwestern University Press, 1970.
Rapp, A. The origins of wit and humor. New York: Dutton, 1951.
Rothbart, M. Incongruity, problem-solving, and laughter. In A. J. Chapman and H. C. Foot (Eds.), Humour and laughter: Theory, research and applications. London: Wiley, 1976.
Scogin, F. J., and Pollio, H. R Targeting and the humorous episode in group process. Human Relations, 1980, 33, 831–852.
Shultz, T. A cognitive-developmental analysis of humour. In A. J. Chapman and H. C. Foot (Eds.), Humour and laughter: Theory, research and applications. London: Wiley, 1976.
Suls, J. M. A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis. In J. H. Goldstein and P. E. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humor. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pollio, H.R. (1983). Notes toward a Field Theory of Humor. In: McGhee, P.E., Goldstein, J.H. (eds) Handbook of Humor Research. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5572-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5572-7_10
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-5574-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5572-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive