Studies in Ancient Astronomy. VIII. The Water Clock in Babylonian Astronomy

  • O. Neugebauer

Abstract

Two clear-cut types of Babylonian astronomy can be distinguished: one, a highly developed mathematical astronomy which flourished the last three centuries before our era; the other, a rather primitive and crude astronomy which we find in texts of which the archetypes, though there is no direct evidence, possibly go back as far as Old-Babylonian times (i.e., about 1600 B.C.). The first-mentioned mathematical astronomy has as its goal the computation of ephemerides for the moon and the planets; this is accomplished by means of the ingeniously devised use of periodic arithmetic progressions of various orders and related interpolatory methods. The high accuracy of these ephemerides, however, is not based on very precise observations but merely on an extensive use of relations between the periods of the phenomena in question.1 The reason for this tendency is obvious: ancient observational instruments are so inaccurate that they cannot compete with the accuracy obtainable by mathematical means from the comparison of few but sufficiently distant observations. This not only holds for Babylonian astronomy but is also the admitted principle on which Greek mathematical astronomy is based, e.g., in the Almagest.

Keywords

Refraction Cylin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography and Abbreviations

  1. Bezold [I]
    C. Bezold — F. Boll — A. Kopff, Zenit-und Aequatorialgestirne am babylonischen Fixsternhimmel. Sitzungsber. d. Heidelberger Akad. d. Wissenschaften, Philos.-hist. Klasse 1913 No. 11.Google Scholar
  2. Blass [I]
    F. Blass, Eudoxi ars astronomica. Programm, Kiel 1887.Google Scholar
  3. Charles, Enoch.
    R. H. Charles, The book of Enoch. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1912.Google Scholar
  4. Craig AAT.
    J. A. Craig, Astrological-astronomical texts copied from the original tablets in the British Museum. Leipzig, 1899.Google Scholar
  5. CT.
    Cuneiform Texts from Babylonian Tablets, etc., in the British Museum.Google Scholar
  6. King [I]
    L. W. King, A Neo-Babylonian astronomical treatise in the British Museum, and its bearing on the age of Babylonian astronomy. Proceedings of the Soc. of Biblical Archaeology 35 (1913) p. 41–46.Google Scholar
  7. Kugler BMR.
    F. X. Kugler, Die babylonische Mondrechnung. Freiburg 1900.Google Scholar
  8. Kugler SSB.
    F. X. Kugler, Sternkunde und Sterndienst in Babel. 2 vols. Münster 1907/1924.Google Scholar
  9. Kugler SSB Erg.
    F. X. Kugler, Sternkunde und Stemdienst in Babel. Ergänzungen. I, Münster 1913, II, 1914 (III see Schaumberger).Google Scholar
  10. Langdon Men.
    S. Langdon, Babylonian Menologies and the Semitic Calendar. London 1935.Google Scholar
  11. Lenormant Choix.
    F. Lenormant, Choix de textes cunéiformes inédits ou incomplètement publiés. Paris 1873.Google Scholar
  12. Neugebauer [I]
    O. Neugebauer, On some astronomical papyri and related problems of ancient geography. Trans. of the Am. Philos. Soc., N.S.32 (1942) p. 251–263.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neugebauer [2]
    O. Neugebauer, The origin of the Egyptian calendar. J. of the Near Eastern Studies 1 (1942) p. 396–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Neugebauer MKT.
    O. Neugebauer, Mathematische Keilschrift-Texte. Quellen und Studien zur Geschichte der Mathematik A 3 (1935/38) 3 vols.Google Scholar
  15. Neugebauer — Sachs MCT.
    O. Neugebauer — A. J. Sachs, Mathematical Cuneiform Texts, American Oriental Series vol. 29 (1945).Google Scholar
  16. Sayce [I]
    A. H. Sayce, Miscellaneous notes 18. An Assyrian augural staff. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 2 (1887) p. 335–337.Google Scholar
  17. Schaumberger Erg.
    J. Schaumberger, part III of Kugler SSB Erg. Münster 1935.Google Scholar
  18. Tannery HAA.
    P. Tannery, Recherches sur l’histoire de l’astronomie ancienne. Paris 1893.Google Scholar
  19. Thureau-Dangin [I]
    Fr. Thureau-Dangin, La clepsydre chez les Babyloniens. Revue d’Assyriologie 29 (1932) p. 133–136.Google Scholar
  20. Thureau-Dangin TU.
    Fr. Thureau-Dangin, Tablettes d’Uruk. Musée du Louvre, Textes cunéiformes 6, Paris 1922.Google Scholar
  21. Virolleaud ACh.
    Ch. Virolleaud, L’astrologie chaldéenne. Paris 1908/1912.Google Scholar
  22. Weidner [I]
    E. F. Weidner, Ein babylonisches Kompendium der Himmelskunde. Am. J. of Semitic Languages and. Literatures 40 (1924) p. 186–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weidner [2]
    E. F. Weidner, Alter und Bedeutung der babylonischen Astronomie und Astrallehre (= Im Kampfe um den Alten Orient 4) Leipzig 1914.Google Scholar
  24. Weidner [3]
    E. F. Weidner, Zur babylonischen Astronomie. III. Mondlauf, Kalender und Zahlenwissenschaft. Babylonica 6 (1912) p. 8–28.Google Scholar
  25. Weidner [4]
    E. F. Weidner, Babylonisches im Buche Henoch. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 19 (1916) col. 74 f.Google Scholar
  26. Weidner Hdb.
    E. F. Weidner, Handbuch der babylonischen Astronomie. I. (= Assyriologische Bibliothek 23), Leipzig 1915.Google Scholar
  27. Weissbach BM.
    F. H. Weissbach, Babylonische Miscellen. Wissensch. Veröff. d. deutschen Orient-Ges. 4. Leipzig 1903.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Neugebauer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations