Radioimmunoassay Procedure for Parathyroid Hormone
A radioimmunoassay (RIA) procedure for parathyroid hormone (PTH) was first described in 1963 by Berson et al.1 However, this assay could differentiate only half of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (1 °HPT) from normal subjects, and many clinicians believed that the assay’s value would be in research rather than patient evaluation. This belief persisted during the next 8–10 years for several reasons: First, Berson and Yalow2 published their classic report on the phenomenon of immunoheterogeneity which showed that there were at least two and probably several different immunoreactive forms of PTH that existed. Second, probably related to the question of immunoheterogeneity, there were numerous conflicting published reports of PTH assays with considerable variation in clinical performance. Third, the reagents necessary for a PTH radioimmunoassay (purified PTH and antiserum) were extremely hard to obtain. And fourth, because of the low circulating levels of PTH in normal humans, the radioimmunoassay “art” had to be extended nearly to its practical limits in order to have the sensitivity required for the assay.
KeywordsParathyroid Hormone Human Parathyroid Hormone Radioimmunoassay Procedure Average Total Count Sodium Barbital Buffer
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Di Bella FP, Gilkinson JB, Flueck J, Arnaud CD: Carboxyl-terminal fragments of human parathyroid hormone in parathyroid tumors: unique new source of immunogens for the production of antisera potentially useful in the radioimmunoassay of parathyroid hormone in human serum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 46:604–612, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Munson PL, Biological assay of parathyroid hormone. In Greep RO, Talmage RV (Eds.): The Parathyroids. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, II, pp 94–107, 1961.Google Scholar
- 7.Hawker CD, Di Bella FP: Human parathyroid hormone: a review of the radioimmunoassay procedure and clinical interpretation. In Natelson, S, Pesce AJ, Dietz AA (Eds.): Clinical Immunochemistry. American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Washington, DC, pp 329–343, 1978.Google Scholar
- 15.Di Bella FP, Hawker CD: Radioimmunoassay for parathyroid hormone: Bane or laboratory test par excellence? I. What to look for and why. Ligand Q 3(4):29–31, 1980.Google Scholar
- 17.Hawker CD, Brunden MN, Sutter ML, Spencer TW: Immunoreactive parathyroid hormone (iPTH) radioimmunoassay: Enhancement of clinical utility with bivariate classification analysis (abstract). Clin Chem 23:1151, 1977.Google Scholar
- 18.Di Bella FP, Hawker CD: Radioimmunoassay for parathyroid hormone: Bane or laboratory test par excellence? II. Endocrine applications. Ligand Q 4(l):26–29, 1981.Google Scholar
- 19.Hawker CD, Di Bella FP: Parathyroid hormone: a laboratory test not just for endocrinologists (editorial). Int J Artif Organs 4:112–115, 1981.Google Scholar
- 20.Di Bella FP, Hawker CD: Use of an “intact” parathyroid hormone assay increases “step-up” gradients in samples obtained by selective venous catheterization (abstract). Calcif Tissue Int 33:320, 1981.Google Scholar
- 23.Roos BA, Lindall AW, Aron DC, Orf JW, Yoon M, Huber MB, Pensky J, Ells J, Lambert PW: Detection and characterization of small midregion parathyroid hormone fragment(s) in normal and hyperparathyroid glands and sera by immunoextraction and region-specific radioimmunoassays. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 53:709–721, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Mallette LE, Bradley WA: Bovine parathyroid hormone-(41–84), a hormone fragment with desirable properties for use as radioligand. J Lab Clin Med 98:886–895, 1981.Google Scholar
- 29.Martin KJ, Hruska K, Freitag J, Bellorin-Font E, Klahr S, Slatopolsky E: Clinical utility of radioimmunoassays for parathyroid hormone. Min Elect Metab 3:283–290, 1980.Google Scholar