The Zone of Proximal Development

Part of the Springer Series in Cognitive Development book series (SSCOG)


Children develop within a changing social world. In interaction with others they acquire new ways of responding to the people and things around them. But even as they practice their new skills, their environment changes and so they must learn still other ways of behaving. Thus, children develop in a dialectical fashion.


Intellectual Functioning Transfer Task Metacognitive Knowledge Proximal Development Dynamic Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference Note

  1. 1.
    Hall, L., & Day, J. D. Comparison of the zone of proximal development in learning disabled, mentally retarded, and normal children. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York: 1982.Google Scholar


  1. Allen, V., & Feldman, R. Studies on the role of tutor. In V. Allen (Ed.), Children as teachers: Theory and research on tutoring. New York: Academic Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  2. Babad, E., & Budoff, M. Sensitivity and validity of learning-potential measurement in three levels of ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974, 66, 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer, R. The new man in Soviet psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  4. Belmont, J., Butterfield, E., & Borkowski, J. Training retarded people to generalize memorization methods across memory tasks. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. London: Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  5. Bereiter, C. Using tests to measure change. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1962, 47, 6–11.Google Scholar
  6. Borkowski, J., & Cavanaugh, J. Maintenance and generalization of skills and strategies by the retarded. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. Borkowski, J., & Kurtz, B. Metacognition and special children. In J. B. Gholson & T. L. Rosenthal (Eds.), Applications of cognitive-developmental theory. New York: Academic Press, in press.Google Scholar
  8. Borkowski, J., Levers, S., & Gruenenfelder, T. Transfer and mediational strategies in children: The role of activity and awareness during strategy acquisition. Child Development, 1976, 47, 779–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, A. The role of strategic behavior in retardate memory. In N. T. Ellis (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, A. Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, A., & Barclay, C. The effects of training specific mnemonics on the meta-mnemonic efficiency of retarded children. Child Development, 1976, 47, 70–80.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, A., & Campione, J. Permissable inferences from the outcome of training studies in cognitive developmental research. Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development, 1978, 2, 46–53.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, A., Campione, J., & Barclay, C. Training self-checking routines for estimating test readiness: Generalization from list learning to prose recall. Child Development, 1979, 50, 501–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, A., Campione, J., & Murphy, M. Maintenance and generalization of metamnemcnic awareness in educable retarded children. Journal of Experimental Child Psyahology, 1977, 24, 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, A., & Ferrara, R. Diagnosing the zone of proximal development. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. New York: Academic Press, in press.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, A., & French, L. The zone of potential development: Implications for intelligence testing in the year 2000. Intelligence, 1979, 3, 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Budoff, M., & Corman, L. Effectiveness of a learning potential procedure in improving problem-solving skills of retarded and non-retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1916, 81, 260–264.Google Scholar
  18. Budoff, M., & Gottlieb, J. Special-class EMR children mainstreamed: A study of an aptitude (learning potential) X treatment interaction. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1916, 81, 1–11.Google Scholar
  19. Budoff, M., & Hamilton, J. Optimizing test performance of moderately and severely mentally retarded adolescents and adults. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1976, 81, 49–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Budoff, M., Meskin, J., & Harrison, R. Educational test of the learning potential hypothesis. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1971, 76, 159–169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Butterfield, E. Instructional techniques that produce generalized improvements in cognition. In P. Mittler (Ed.), Frontiers of knowledge in mental retardation (Vol. 1). Baltimore: University Park Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  22. Butterfield, E., & Belmont, J. The role of verbal processes in short-term memory. In R. L. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Language research with the mentally retarded. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  23. Campbell, D., & Fiske, D. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 1959, 56, 81–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Campione, J., & Brown, A. The effects of contextual changes and degree of component mastery in transfer of training. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  25. Campione, J., & Brown, A. Memory and metamemory development in educable retarded children. In R. V. Kail, Jr., & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977.Google Scholar
  26. Campione, J., & Brown, A. Learning ability and transfer propensity as sources of individual differences in intelligence. In P. H. Brooks, C. McCauley, & R. Sperber (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded. Baltimore: University Park Press, in press.Google Scholar
  27. Campione, J., Brown, A., & Ferrara, R. Mental retardation and intelligence. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence, New York & London: Cambridge University Press, in press.Google Scholar
  28. Clarke, A. M., & Clarke, A. D. B. Severe subnormality: Capacity and performance. In A. M. Clarke & A. D. B. Clarke (Eds.), Readings from mental deficiency: The changing outlook. London: Methuen, 1978.Google Scholar
  29. Clarke-Stewart, K. Interactions between mothers and their young children: Characteristics and consequences. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1913, 38(6-1, Serial No. 153).Google Scholar
  30. Cole, M. (Ed.). Introduction. In The selected writings of A. R. Luria. White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1978.Google Scholar
  31. Cole, M., & Scribner, S. Introduction. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  32. Collins, A., & Stevens, A. Goals and strategies of inquiry teachers. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional technology (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981.Google Scholar
  33. Faris, R. E. L. Reflections on the ability dimensions in human society. American Sociological Review, 1961, 26, 835–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ferguson, G. On learning and human ability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1954, 8, 95–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Feuerstein, R. The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  36. Feuerstein, R. Instrumental enrichment. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  37. Flavell, J. Metacognitive development. In J. M. Scandura & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Structural/pro cess theories of complex human behaviors. Alphen a.d. Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1978.Google Scholar
  38. Gardner, W., & Rogoff, B. The role of instruction in memory development: Some methodological choices. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 1982, 4, 6–12.Google Scholar
  39. Hamilton, J., & Budoff, M. Learning potential among the moderately and severely retarded. Mental Retardation, 1974, 72, 33–36.Google Scholar
  40. Haywood, H., & Arbitman-Smith, R. Modification of cognitive functions in slowlearning adolescents. In P. Mittler (Ed.), Frontiers of knowledge in mental retardation (Vol. 1). Baltimore: University Park Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  41. Haywood, H., Filler, J., Shifman, M., & Chatelanat, G. Behavioral assessment in mental retardation. In P. McReynolds (Ed.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 3). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.Google Scholar
  42. Haywood, H., & Wachs, T. Intelligence, cognition and individual differences. In M. Begab, H. Haywood, & H. Garber (Eds.), Psychosocial influences in retarded performance. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  43. Hood, L., Feiss, K., & Aron, J. Growing up explained: Vygotskians look at the language of causality. In C. Brainerd & M. Pressley (Eds.), Verbal processes in children. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar
  44. Hood, L., McDermott, R., & Cole, M. “Let’s try to make it a good day”—Some not so simple ways. Discourse Processes, 1980, 3, 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Keeney, T., Cannizzo, S., & Flavell, J. Spontaneous and induced rehearsal in a recall task. Child Development, 1961, 38, 953–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kennedy, T., & Miller, D. Persistent use of verbal rehearsal as a function of information about its value. Child Development, 1976, 47, 566–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kussmann, T. The Soviet concept of development and the problem of activity. In K. F. Riegel & J. A. Meacham (Eds.), The developing individual in a changing world. Chicago: Aidine, 1976.Google Scholar
  48. Leont’ev, A. N. Learning as a problem in psychology. In N. O’Connor (Ed.), Recent Soviet psychology. New York: Van Rees Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  49. Lomov, B. Soviet psychology: Its historical origins and contemporary status. American Psychologist, 1982, 37, 580–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Luria, A. The problem of the cultural development of the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1928, 35, 493–506.Google Scholar
  51. Luria, A. R. An objective approach to the study of the abnormal child. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1961, 57, 1–14.Google Scholar
  52. Luria, A. Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations (M. Cole, Ed.; M. Lopez-Morillas & L. Solotaroff, trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  53. Luria, A. The making of mind (M. Cole & S. Cole, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  54. McLeish, J. Soviet psychology: History, theory, content. London: Methuen, 1975.Google Scholar
  55. Meacham, J. The development of memory abilities in the individual and society. Human Development, 1972, 75, 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meacham, J. Continuing the dialogue: Dialectics and remembering. Human Development, 1916, 19, 304–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Parke, R., & O’Leary, S. Father-mother-infant interaction in the newborn period: Some findings, some observations, and some unresolved issues. In K. F. Riegel & J. Meacham (Eds.), The developing individual in a changing world (Vol. 2, Social and environmental issues). The Hague: Mouton, 1976.Google Scholar
  58. Piaget, J. The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press, 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pressley, M. Making meaningful materials easier to learn: Lessons from cognitive strategy research. In M. Pressley & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: Educational applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1983.Google Scholar
  60. Pressley, M., & Dennis-Rounds, J. Transfer of a mnemonic keyword strategy at two age levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980, 72, 575–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rahmani, L. Philosophy and psychology in the Soviet Union. In K. F. Riegel & J. A. Meacham (Eds.), The developing individual in a changing world. Chicago: Aidine, 1976.Google Scholar
  62. Resnick, L. The future of IQ testing in education. Intelligence, 1979, 3, 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Riegel, K. Toward a dialectical theory of development. Human Development, 1975, 18, 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Riegel, K. The dialectics of human development. American Psychology, 1976, 10, 689–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sameroff, A. Transactional models in early social relations. Human Development, 1915, 18, 65–79.Google Scholar
  66. Schucman, H. Evaluating the educability of the severely mentally retarded child. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1960, 74(14), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Siegler, R. Three aspects of cognitive development. Cognitive Psychology, 1976, 8, 481–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sutton, A. Backward children in the USSR: An unfamiliar approach to a familiar problem. In J. Brine, M. Perrie, & A. Sutton (Eds.), Home, school and leisure in the Soviet UnionHome, school and leisure in the Soviet Union. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1980.Google Scholar
  69. Tulkin, S., & Konner, M. Alternative conceptions of intellectual functioning. Human Development, 1913, 16, 33–52.Google Scholar
  70. Venable, V. Human nature: The Marxian view. New York: Knopf, 1945.Google Scholar
  71. Vygotsky, L. S. The problem of the cultural development of the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1929, 36, 415–434.Google Scholar
  72. Vygotsky, L. Thought and language (E. Haufmann and G. Vakar, Eds. and trans.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vygotsky, L. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  74. Wertsch, J. From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory. Human Development, 1919, 22, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wertsch, J. The concept of activity in Soviet psychology: An introduction. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in the Soviet Union. New York: Sharpe, 1981.Google Scholar
  76. Wertsch, J., McNamee, G., McLane, J., & Budwig, N. The adult-child dyad as a problem-solving system. Child Development, 1980, 51, 1215–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wozniak, R. H. A dialectical paradigm for psychological research: Implications drawn from the history of psychology in the Soviet Union. Human Development, 1915, 18, 18–34. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wozniak, R. Dialecticism and structuralism: The philosophical foundation of Soviet psychology and Piagetian cognitive developmental theory. In K. F. Riegel & G. C. Rosenwald (Eds.), Structure and transformation: Developmental and historical aspects. New York: Wiley, 1975. (b)Google Scholar
  79. Wozniak, R. Psychology and education of the learning disabled child in the Soviet Union. In W. M. Cruickshank & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Perceptual and learning disabilities in children. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1975. (c)Google Scholar
  80. Yarrow, L., Rubenstein, J., & Pedersen, F. Infant and environment. New York: Halsted Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1983

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations