Advertisement

Limits of Primate Talk

  • Thomas W. Simon
Part of the Springer Series in Language and Communication book series (SSLAN, volume 11)

Abstract

Who are the participants in this conversation? A child therapist and one of those menacing hyperactive children that seem to be overpopulating our schools these days? Or is this a cuckoo-nest dialogue between Ken Kesey and the Big Nurse? Or could it simply be an adult talking to a child-which some claim to be the simplest dialogic form imaginable? Would it be at all startling to discover that this is the first rendition of a linguistic interchange between a nonhuman primate and a digital computer? Although our example is contrived, it is not very contrived, consisting, as it does, of an amalgam of expressions from Weizenbaum’s (1976) computer program ELIZA (see also Boden, 1977) and the gorilla Koko’s recorded utterances (Patterson & Linden, 1981). By constructing this machine-ape communication have we bridged a gap greater than molecular biologists are doing between prokaryotes and eukaryotes with recombinant DNA? Have we erected the ultimate Turing test (which seems to be a primary one for primatologists) whereby both parties can now be said to understand language because you, the observers, were fooled into thinking both of them were human?

Keywords

Nonhuman Primate Sign Language Primate Language World Knowledge Iconic Gesture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boden, M. Artificial intelligence and natural man. New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Bogen, J. E., & Bogen, G. M. Wernicke’s region-Where is it? In S. Harnad, H. D. Steklis, & J. Lancaster, (Eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1976, pp. 834–843.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, R. Psycholinguistics. New York: Free Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  4. Chomsky, N. Cartesian linguistics. New York: Harper & Row, 1966.Google Scholar
  5. Churchland, P. S., & Churchland, P. M. Internal states and cognitive theories. The Behaviorial and Brain Sciences, 1978, 4, 565–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dennett, D. Brainstorms. Montgomery, Vt.: Bradford Books, 1978.Google Scholar
  7. Dreyfus, H. What computers can’t do. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.Google Scholar
  8. Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G., & Garrett, M. F. The psychology of language: An introduction to psycholinguistics and generative grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.Google Scholar
  9. Fouts, R. S. Sign language in chimpanzees. In F. C. C. Peng (Ed.), Sign language and language acquisition in man and ape: New dimensions in comparative psycholinguistics. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1978, pp. 121–136.Google Scholar
  10. Gardner, R. A., & Gardner, B. T. Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. Science, 1969, 165, 644–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gopnik, M. The ape language controversy. Unpublished manuscript, McGill University, 1981. (a)Google Scholar
  12. Gopnik, M. Personal communication, 1981. (b)Google Scholar
  13. Griffin, D. R. The question of animal awareness. New York: Rockefeller University Press, 1976, p. 74.Google Scholar
  14. Hockett, C. F., & Altman, S. A. A note on design features. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Animal communication. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1968, pp. 61–72.Google Scholar
  15. Katz, J. J. A hypothesis about the uniqueness of natural language. In S. Harnad, H. D. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (Eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1976, pp. 33–41.Google Scholar
  16. Kellogg, W. N. Communication and language in the home-raised chimpanzee. In T. A. Sebeok & J. Umiker-Sebeok (Eds.), Speaking of apes. New York: Plenum Press, 1980, pp. 61–70.Google Scholar
  17. Lenneberg, E. H. Of language, knowledge, apes, and brains. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1971, 1, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luly, J. C. Lilly on dolphins. Garden City, N. Y.: Anchor Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  19. Marier, P. Communication in monkeys and apes. In I. DeVore (Ed.), Primate Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1965, pp. 544–585.Google Scholar
  20. Menzel, E. W., & Johnson, M. K. Should mentalistic concepts be defended or assumed? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1978, 4, 586–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Midgley, M. Beast and man. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  22. Patterson, F., & Linden, E. The education of Koko. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1981.Google Scholar
  23. Pratt, D. Painful experiments on animals. New York: Argus, 1976.Google Scholar
  24. Pylyshyn, Z. M. When is attribution of beliefs justified? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1978, 4, 592–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Robinson, B. W. Limbic influences on human speech. In S. Harnad, H. D. Steklis, & J. Lancaster (Eds.), Origins and evolution of language and speech. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1976, 761–771.Google Scholar
  26. Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S., Rumbaugh, D. M., & Boysen, S. Linguistically mediated tool use and exchange by chimpanzees. The Behavioral and Brain Scies, 1978, 4, 539–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singer, P. Animal liberation. New York: New York Review of Books, 1975.Google Scholar
  28. Umiker-Sebeok, J., & Sebeok, T. A. Questioning apes. In T. A. Sebeok & J. Umiker-Sebeok (Eds.), Speaking of apes. New York: Plenum Press, 1980, pp. 1–59.Google Scholar
  29. Weizenbaum, J. Computer power and human reason. San Francisco: Freeman, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas W. Simon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations