Implementing the New Law of the Sea: The Mexican Experience

  • Alberto Székely
Part of the Springer Series on Environmental Management book series (SSEM)


Mexico’s foreign policy traditionally has been characterized by its persevering reliance on a handful of general and fundamental principles. Its behavior abroad has been guided by them on all fronts and in all forums. Championing nonintervention, self-determination, a generous policy for the indiscriminate granting of asylum, the peaceful settlement of international disputes, and the permanent sovereignty of people over their natural resources has only been the result of deep committment to the strict adherance to the binding rules of international law.


Coastal State Exclusive Economic Zone Maximum Sustainable Yield Living Resource Permanent Sovereignty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anuario Estadistico del Departamento de Pesca. 1981. (In press.)Google Scholar
  2. Carranza Frazer, 1978. La Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica en el Desarrollo Pes quero del Pais. In Vigesima Serio de Mesas Redondas: Panorama Pesquero Nacional, Analisis de Tres Lustros. Instituto Mexicano de Recursos Naturales Renovables, Mexico, p. 17.Google Scholar
  3. Departamento de Pesca. 1977. National Program for Fisheries Development. Mexico City, 2 vols.Google Scholar
  4. Diario Oficial, 18 December 1902.Google Scholar
  5. Diario Oficial, 5 February 1917.Google Scholar
  6. Diario Oficial, 31 August 1935.Google Scholar
  7. Diario Oficial, 20 January 1967.Google Scholar
  8. Diario Oficial, 26 December 1969.Google Scholar
  9. Diario Oficial, 5 November, 1975.Google Scholar
  10. Diario Oficial, 6 and 13 February 1976a.Google Scholar
  11. Diario Oficial, 1 June 1976b.Google Scholar
  12. Diario Oficial, 21 January 1980.Google Scholar
  13. Garcia Robles, 1981. The Second United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. A Reply. 55 AJIL, pp. 660–675.Google Scholar
  14. Joseph, J., and Greenough, W. 1979. International Management of Tuna, Porpoise and Billfish. University of Washington Press, Seattle and London. 1979.Google Scholar
  15. Neptune. 1975. Independent News at the Law of the Sea Conference, Geneva, vol, 3, 14 April 1975, p.5.Google Scholar
  16. Scripps Institute of Oceanography. 1976. Marine Resources Off the West Coast of Mexico. La Jolla, California, p. 1.Google Scholar
  17. Székely, 1976. Study on the Contribution of Latin America to the Development of the Law of the Sea. (Oceana Publications, Dobbs-Ferry, New York. United Nations. 1900.Google Scholar
  18. Székely, 1979. Mexico y el Derecho Internacional del Mar. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico, p. 57.Google Scholar
  19. Truman, H. 1945a. Presidential Proclamation N. 2667, of 28 September 1945, 59 Stat. 884.Google Scholar
  20. Truman, H. 1945b. Presidential Proclamation N. 2668, Of 28 September 1945, 59 Stat. 885.Google Scholar
  21. UNCLOS I, Official Records, Vol, III, p. 177.Google Scholar
  22. Vargas Carreno, 1973. America Latina y el Derecho del Mar. Fondo de Cultura Economica, Mexico.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Székely

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations