Comparison Voting

  • Steven J. Brams
Part of the Modules in Applied Mathematics book series (MAM)

Abstract

As a preview of the subsequent analysis, imagine the following hypothetical situation. Assume that the five most recent Democratic presidents all lived at the same time (the present). All decide to seek their party’s presidential nomination in the first presidential primary in New Hampshire. You are a registered Democratic voter in New Hampshire and can vote for any candidate. If the candidate with the most votes wins in a plurality election, which candidate would you vote for? (Your judgment should be based not on the specific policies advocated by these presidents at the time they served, but instead on their competence to solve problems and their effectiveness as political leaders.)

Keywords

Assure Proval 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boehm, George A. W. “One Fervent Vote against Wintergreen,” mimeographed, 1976.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brams, Steven J. “One Man, n Votes,” mimeographed. Module in Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Association of America, 1976.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brams, Steven J. Paradoxes in Politics: An Introduction to the Nonobvious in Political Science. Free Press, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brams, Steven J. “When Is It Advantageous to Cast a Negative Vote?,” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (Mathematical Economics and Game Theory: Essays in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern, R. Henn and O. Moeschlin eds.) 141. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1977), 564–572.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brams, Steven J. The Presidential Election Game. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1978.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brams, Steven J., and Fishburn, Peter C. Approval Voting. Birkhäuser, Boston, (in press).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brams, Steven J. and Fishburn, Peter C. “Approval Voting,” American Political Science Review, 72 (1978), 831–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fishburn, Peter C. “A Strategic Analysis of Nonranked Voting Systems,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 35 (1978), 488–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Joslyn, Richard A. “The Impact of Decision Rules in Multicandidate Campaigns: The Case of the 1972 Democratic Presidential Nomination,” Public Choice 25(1976), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keech, William R. and Matthews, Donald R. The Party’s Choice. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1976.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kellett, John, and Mott, Kenneth. “Presidential Primaries: Measuring Popular Choice,” Polity, 9 (1977), 528–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kiewiet, D. Roderick, “Approval Voting: The Case of the 1968 Presidential Election,” Polity, 12 (1979), 170–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mazmanian, Daniel A. Third Parties in Presidential Elections. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1974.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Merrill, Samuel III. “Approval Voting: A ‘Best Buy’ Method for Multicandidate Elections?” Mathematics Magazine, 52 (1978), 98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Riker, William H. “The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger’s Law,” Comparative Politics, 9 (1976), 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scammon, Richard M., and Wattenberg, Ben J. The Real Majority: An Extra-ordinary Examination of the American Electorate. Coward, McCann, & Geoghegan New York, 1970.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stratmann, William C. “The Calculus of Rational Choice,” Public Choice, 18 (1974), 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stratmann, William C. Personal communication (September 21, 1977).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weber, Robert James. “Comparison of Voting Systems,” mimeographed, 1977.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weber, Robert James. “Multiply-Weighted Voting Systems,” mimeographed, 1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven J. Brams
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations