Advertisement

Electroantennogram Assays: Rapid and Convenient Screening Procedures for Pheromones

  • Wendell L. Roelofs
Part of the Springer Series in Experimental Entomology book series (SSEXP)

Abstract

Although odor perception in general is poorly understood, the insect’s peripheral sensing system-the antenna-is easily accessible and has been studied in great detail (Steinbrecht and Schneider, 1980;Kaissling and Thorson, 1980;Kaissling, 1971). Schneider (1957) pioneered the electroantennogram (EAG) technique and carried out the first electrophysiological experiments on olfaction in insects with Bombyx mori. Studies with B. mori revealed that slow olfactory receptor potentials could be recorded from an isolated antenna positioned between two glass capillary microelectrodes connected to an amplifier and a recording instrument. Schneider (1963) suggested that the “EAG is essentially the sum of many olfactory receptor potentials recorded more or less simultaneously by an electrode located in the sensory epithelium.” He interpreted (Schneider, 1969) the negative potential of these slow electrical reactions of dendrites in the olfactory cells as a receptor membrane depolarization. The amplitude of the response, which correlates to the frequency of generated nerve impulses, was found to increase with increasing concentrations of the chemical stimulus until a saturation level was reached.

Keywords

Response Spectrum Gypsy Moth Pheromone Component European Corn Borer Reference Stimulus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angst ME, Lanier GN (1979) Electroantennogram responses of two populations of Ips pini (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) to insect-produced and host tree compounds. J Chem Ecol 5: 131– 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker TC, Cardé RT, Roelofs WL (1976) Behavioral responses of male Argyrotaenia velutinana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to components of its sex pheromone. J Chem Ecol 2: 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker TC, Meyer W, Roelofs WL (1981) Sex pheromone dosage and blend discrimination by Oriental fruit moth males. Entomol Exp Appl 30: 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker TC, Roelofs WL (1976) Electroantennogram responses of the male moth Argyrotaenia velutinana to mixtures of sex pheromone components of the female. J Insect Physiol 22: 1357–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjostad LB, Roelofs WL (1980) An inexpensive electronic device for measuring electroantennogram responses to sex pheromone components with a voltmeter. Physiol Entomol 5: 309–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buser HR, Rauscher S, Arn H (1974) Sex pheromone of the Lobesia botrana: (E,Z)-7,9-dodecadienyl acetate in the female grape vine moth. Z. Naturforsch 29: 781–783.Google Scholar
  7. Cardé RT, Doane CC, Baker TC, Iwaki S, Marumo S (1977) Attractancy of optically active pheromone for male gypsy moths. Environ Entomol 6: 768–772.Google Scholar
  8. Dickens JC, Payne TL (1977) Bark beetle olfaction: pheromone receptor system in Dendroctonus frontalis Zimm. ( Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J Insect Physiol 23: 481–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gutmann A, Payne TL, Roberts EA, Schulte-Elte K-H, Giersch W, Ohloff G W. L. Roelofs (1981) Antennal olfactory response of boll weevil to grandlure and vicinal dimethyl analogs. J Chem Ecol 7: 919–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hill AS, Cardé RT, Kido H, Roelofs WL (1975) Sex pheromones of the orange tortrix moth, Argyro taenia citrana. J Chem Ecol 1: 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hill AS, Kovalev BG, Nikolaeva LN, Roelofs WL (1982) Sex pheromone of the fall webworm moth Hyphantria cunea. J Chem Ecol 8: 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hill AS, Roelofs WL (1981) Sex pheromone of the saltmarsh caterpillar moth, Estigmene acrea. J Chem Ecol 7: 655–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jewett DM, Matsumura F, Coppel HC (1976) Sex pheromone specificity in the pine sawflies: Interchange of acid moieties in an ester. Science 192: 51–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jewett DM, Matsumura F, Coppel HC (1977) A simple system for recording electroantennograms from male pine sawflies. J Electrophysiol Tech 5: 23–28.Google Scholar
  15. Kaissling KE (1971) Insect olfaction. In: Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol IV/1. Beidler LM (ed), Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  16. Kaissling KE (1979) Recognition of pheromones by moths, especially in Saturniids and Bombyx mori. In: Chemical Ecology: Odour Communication in Animals. Ritter FJ (ed), Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  17. Kaissling KE, Thorson J (1980) Insect olfactory sensilla: Structural, chemical and electrical aspects of the functional organization. In: Receptors for Neurotransmitters, Hormones and Pheromones in Insects. Sattelle DB, Hall, LM, Hildebrand JG (eds), Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Klun JA, Chapman OL, Mattes KC, Wojtkowski PW, Beroza M, Sonnet PE (1973) Insect sex pheromones: Minor amount of opposite geometrical isomer critical to attaction. Science 181: 661 - 663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kochansky, J, Carde RT, Liebherr J, Roelofs WL (1975) Sex pheromones of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) in New York. J Chem Ecol 1: 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kraemer ME, Coppel HC, Matsumura F, Wilkinson RC, Kikukawa T (1981) Field and electroantennogram responses of the red-headed pine sawfly, Neodiprion lecontei (Fitch), to optical isomers of sawfly pheromones. J Chem Ecol 7: 1063–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levinson AR, Levinson HZ, Schwaiger H, Cassidy RF, Silverstein RM (1978) Olfactory behavior and receptor potentials of the khapra bettle Trogoderma granarium (Coleoptera: Dermestidae) induced by the major components of its sex pheromone, certain analogues and fatty acid esters. J Chem Ecol 4: 95– 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Linn CE, Roelofs WL (1981) Modification of sex pheromone blend discrimination in male Oriental fruit moths by pre-exposure to (E)-8-dodecenyl acetate. Physiol. Entomol 6: 421– 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lofstedt C, Van Der Pers JNC, Lofqvist J, Lanne BS (1983) Sex pheromone of the cone-pyralid Dioryctria abietella. Ent Exp Appl 34: 20– 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McDonough LM, Moffitt HR (1974) Sex pheromone of the codling moth. Science 183: 978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller JR, Mori K, Roelofs WL (1977) Gypsy moth field trapping and electroantennogram studies with pheromone enantiomers. J Insect Physiol 23: 1447–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Minks AK, Roelofs WL, Ritter FJ, Persoons CJ (1973) Reproductive isolation of two tortricid moth species by different ratios of a two-component sex attractant. Science 180: 1073–1074.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Minks AK, Roelofs WL, Schuurmans-van Kijk E, Persoons CJ, Ritter FJ (1974) Electroantennogram responses of two tortricid moths using two-component sex pheromones. J Insect Physiol 20: 1659–1665.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moore I (1981) Biological amplification for increasing electroantennogram discrimination between two female sex pheromones of Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Chem Ecol 7: 791–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mori K, Ebata T (1981) Synthesis of optically active pheromones with an epoxy ring, (+)-disparlure and the saltmarsh caterpillar moth pheromone [Z,Z)- 3,6-cis-9,10-epoxyheneicosadiene]. Tet Lett 22: 4281–4282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nagai T (1981) Electroantennogram response gradient on the antenna of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis. J Insect Physiol 27: 889–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nagai T, Starratt AN, McLeod DGR, Driscoll GR (1977) Electroantennogram responses of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis, to (Z)-and (E)-l 1- tetradecenyl acetates. J Insect Physiol 23: 591–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nishino C, Kimura R (1981) Isolation of sex pheromone mimic of the American cockroach by monitoring with male/female ratio in electroantennogram. J Insect Physiol 27: 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nishino C, Kimura R (1982) Olfactory receptor responses of the nymphal American cockroach to sex pheromones and their mimics. Comp Biochem Physiol 72A: 237–242.Google Scholar
  34. Nishino C, Takayanagi H (1981) Male/female ratio in electroantennogram responses of the American cockroach to (+Hran,y-verbenyl acetate and related compounds: Relationships between the ratio and sex pheromonal activity. Comp Biochem Physiol 70A: 229–234.Google Scholar
  35. O’Connell RJ (1975) Olfactory receptor responses to sex pheromone components in the redbanded leafroller moth. J Gen Physiol 65: 179–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Payne TL (1975) Bark beetle olfaction. III. Antennal olfactory responsiveness of Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman and D. brevicomis LeConte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to aggregation pheromones and host tree terpene hydrocarbons. J Chem Soc 1: 233–242.Google Scholar
  37. Payne TL (1979) Pheromone and host odor perception in bark beetles. In: Neurotoxicology of Insecticides and Pheromones. Narahashi T (ed), Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Payne TL, Richerson JV, Dickens JC, West JR, Mori K, Berisford CW, Hedden RL, Vire JP, Blum MS (1982) Southern pine beetle olfactory receptor and behavior discrimination of enantiomers of the attractant pheromone frontalis J Chem Ecol 8: 873–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Persoons CJ, Verwiel PEJ, Talman E, Ritter FJ (1979) Sex pheromone of the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana-Isolation and structure elucidation of periplanone-B. J Chem Ecol 5: 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Persoons CJ, Voerman S, Verwiel PEJ, Ritter FJ, Nooyen WJ, Minks AK (1976) Sex pheromone of the potato tuberworm moth, Phthorimaea operculella: Isolation, identification and field evaluation. Entomol Exp Appl 20: 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Priesner E (1973) Artspezifitat und Funktion einiger Insektenpheromone. Fortschr Zool 22: 49–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Priesner E (1979a) Specificity studies on pheromone receptors of noctuid and tortricid Lepidoptera. In: Chemical Ecology: Odour Communication in Animals. Ritter FJ (ed), Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  43. Priesner E (1979b) Progress in the analysis of pheromone receptor systems. Ann Zool Ecol Anim 11: 533–546.Google Scholar
  44. Priesner E (1980) Sensory encoding of pheromone signals and related stimuli in male moths. In: Insect Neurobiology and Pesticide Action (Neurotox 79 ). Soc Chem Ind, London.Google Scholar
  45. Priesner E, Bestmann HJ, Vostrowsky O, Rosel P (1977) Sensory efficacy of alkyl-branched pheromone analogues in noctuid and tortricid Lepidoptera. Z Naturforsch 32: 979–991.Google Scholar
  46. Priesner E, Jacobson M, Bestmann HJ (1975) Structure-response relationships in noctuid sex pheromone reception. J Naturforsch 30: 283–293.Google Scholar
  47. Renou M, Descoins C, Lallemand JY, Priesner E, Lettere M, Gallois M (1980) L’acetoxy-l dodecene 3E, composant principal de la pheromone sexuelle de la teigne de la betterave: Scrobipalpa ocellatella Boyd. (Lepidoptere: Gelechiidae). Z Angew Entomol 90: 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roelofs WL (1977) The scope and limitations of the electroantennogram technique in identifying pheromone components. In Crop Protection Agents- Their Biological Evaluation. McFarlane NR (ed), Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Roelofs WL (1978) Chemical control of insects by pheromones. In: Biochemistry of Insects. Rockstein M (ed), Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Roelofs WL (1979) Electroantennograms. Chemtech 9: 222–227.Google Scholar
  51. Roelofs WL, Cardé RT (1974) Oriental fruit moth and lesser appleworm attrac- tant mixtures redefined. Environ Entomol 3: 586–588.Google Scholar
  52. Roelofs WL, Cardé A, Hill A, Carde R (1976) Sex pheromone of the threelined leafroller, Pandemis limitata. Environ Entomol 5: 649–652.Google Scholar
  53. Roelofs W, Comeau A (1971) Sex attractants in Lepidoptera. In: Chemical Releasers in Insects. Tahori AS (ed), Gordon and Breach, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Roelofs W, Comeau A, Hill A, Millicevic G (1971) Sex attractant of the codling moth: Characterization with electroantennogram technique. Science 174: 297–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roelofs WL, Hill AS, Linn CE, Meinwald J, Jain S, Herbert HJ, Smith RF (1982) Sex pheromone of the winter moth-A geometrid with unusually low-temperature precopulatory responses. Science 217: 657–658.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roelofs W, Kochansky J, Anthon E, Rice R, Cardé R (1975a) Sex pheromone of the peach twig borer (Anarsia lineatella). Environ Entomol 4: 580–582.Google Scholar
  57. Roelofs WL, Kochansky J, Cardé R, Arn H, Rauscher S (1973) Sex attractant of the grape vine moth, Lobesia botrana. Bull Soc Entomol Sci 46: 71–73.Google Scholar
  58. Roelofs WL, Kochansky JP, Cardé RT, Kennedy GG, Henrick CA, Labovitz JN, Corbin VL (1975b) Sex pheromone of the potato tuberworm moth, Phthorimaea operculella. Life Sci 17: 699–706.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schneider D (1957) Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen von Chemo-und Mechanorezeptoren der Antenne des Seidenspinners Bombyx mori L. Z Vergl Physiol 40: 8–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schneider D (1963) Electrophysiological investigation of insect olfaction. In: Olfaction and Taste, I. Zotterman Y (ed), Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  61. Schneider D (1969) Insect olfaction: Deciphering system for chemical messages. Science 163: 1031–1037.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schneider D, Kafka WA, Beroza M, Bierl BA (1977) Odor receptor responses of male gypsy and nun moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) to disparlure and its analogues. J Comp Physiol 113: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Steinbrecht RA, Schneider D (1980) Pheromone communication in moths sensory physiology and behavior. In: Insect Biology in the Future. Locke M, Smith DS (eds), Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  64. Vite JP, Klimetzek D, Loskant G, Hedden R, Mori K (1976) Chirality of insect pheromones: Response interruption by inactive antipodes. Naturwiss 63: 582–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wadhams LJ, Angst ME, Blight MM (1982) Responses of the olfactory receptors of Scolytus scolytus (F.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to the stereoisomers of 4-methyl-3-heptanol. J Chem Ecol 8: 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weatherston J, Roelofs W, Comeau A, Sanders CJ (1971) Studies of physiologically active arthropod secretions X. Sex pheromone of the Eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can Entomol 103: 1741–1747.Google Scholar
  67. Williams IH, Pickett J A, Martin AP (1982) Nasonov pheromone of the honeybee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae), IV. Comparative electroantennogram responses. J Chem Ecol 8: 567–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yamada M, Saito T, Katagiri K, Iwaki S, Marumo S (1976) Electroantennogram and behavioral responses of the gypsy moth to enantiomers of disparlure and its trans analogues. J Insect Physiol 22: 755–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yamaoka R, Fukami H, Ishii S (1976) Isolation and identification of the female sex pheromone of the potato tuberworm, Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller). Agric Biol Chem 40: 1971–1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendell L. Roelofs
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyNew York State Agricultural Experiment StationGenevaUSA

Personalised recommendations