Skip to main content

The Need for Alternatives to Informed Consent by Older Patients

Psychological and Physical Aspects of the Institutionalized Elderly

  • Chapter
Alzheimer’s Dementia

Abstract

Issues revolving around the process of informed consent for research on elderly subjects are compounded for the physician dealing with institutionalized patients.1–10 The effects of institutionalization on a subject’s ability to give consent must be considered: the population of a nursing facility not only constitutes a representative community of subjects for research, but it also includes a large number of dementia patients, particularly those with moderate and severe dementias. Hence, the nursing home is a crucial element in geriatric research. Since research on senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type (SDAT) must include the nursing home population, it is necessary to review the characteristics of the institutionalized elderly that make them psychologically and physically vulnerable to research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. H. K. Beecher, “Ethics and Clinical Research,” New England Journal of Medicine 274, 1966, 1354–1360.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Berkowitz, “Informed Consent, Research and the Elderly,” Gerontologist 18, 1978, 237–243.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. N. Butler, “Protection of Elderly Research Subjects,” Clinical Research 28, February 1980, 3–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. P. Lawton, “Psychological Vulnerability of Elderly Subjects,” in NIA Conference on the Protection of Elderly Research Subjects, DHEW 79–1801, pp. 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. L. Makarushka and R. D. McDonald, “Informed Consent, Research, and Geriatric Patients: The Responsibility of Institutional Review Committees,” Gerontologist 19, 1979, 61–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. NIA Conference on the Protection of Elderly Research Subjects, NIA, Bethesda, MD, 1977, DHEW 79–1801.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. M. Ratzan, “Being Old Makes You Different: The Ethics of Research with Elderly Subjects,” Hastings Center Report 10, October 1980, 32–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. W. T. Reich, “Ethical Issues Related to Research Involving Elderly Subjects,” Gerontologist 18, 1978, 326–337.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. A. J. Rosoff, “Informed Consent: A Guide for Health Care Providers,” Rockville, MD, Aspen Systems, 1981, 522 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. B. Wales and D. L. Trybig, “Recent Legislative Trends Toward Protection of Human Subjects: Implications for Gerontologists,” Gerontologist 18, 1978, 244–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. H. A. Taub, “Informed Consent, Memory and Age,” Gerontologist 20, 1980, 686–690.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Miller and H. S. Willner, “The Two-part Consent Form: A Suggestion for Promoting Free and Informed Consent,” New England Journal of Medicine 290, 1974, 964–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. R. M. Ratzan, “The Experiment That Wasn’t: A Case Report on Clinical Geriatric Research,” Gerontologist 21, 1981, 297–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. C. K. Cassel and A. L. Jameton, “Dementia in the Elderly: An Analysis of Medical Responsibility,” Annals of Internal Medicine 94, 1981, 802–807.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. R. N. Butler, “The Teaching Nursing Home,” DAMA 245, 1981, 1435–1437.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. F. J. Ingelfinger, “Informed (but uneducated) Consent,” New England Journal of Medicine 287, 1972, 465 466.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. J. Miller, “Informed Consent,” I. JAMA 244, 1980, 2100–2103. II. Ibid, 2347–2350. III. Ibid, 2556–2558. IV. Ibid, 2661–2662.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Zicklin and L. S. Libow, The Penultimate Will, NY State Bar J 1975, 31–33, 63–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 The Humana Press, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoffman, P.B., Libow, L.S. (1985). The Need for Alternatives to Informed Consent by Older Patients. In: Melnick, V.L., Dubler, N.N. (eds) Alzheimer’s Dementia. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5174-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5174-3_12

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9597-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5174-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics