Abstract
It is generally believed that in the area of drug use only two types of behavior are possible—abstinence, or unchecked excess leading to addiction. Despite massive evidence to the contrary, many people remain unshaken in this belief. The conviction persists that because of their pharmacological properties, the psychedelics, heroin, and, to a lesser extent, marihuana cannot be taken on a long-term, regular basis without causing serious problems. Until after 1970, even scientific researchers were strongly influenced by this moralistic view that any kind of illicit drug use was bad and inevitably harmful—“addictive”—and that abstention was the only alternative.1 The unfortunate condition of heroin addicts and other compulsive users was regularly cited as “proof” of this “pharmaco-mythology.”2 Related to that view was the equally strong conviction that individuals who sought out such drugs were almost always suffering from profound personality disorders.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
N. E. Zinberg et al., “Patterns of Heroin Use,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 311 (1978), 10–24.
T. S. Szasz, Ceremonial Chemistry: The Ritual Perception of Drugs, Addicts and Pushers, Garden City, New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1975.
M. Heller, The Sources of Drug Abuse, New York: Addiction Services Agency, 1972.
N. E. Zinberg, Drug,Set, and Setting: The Basis for Controlled Intoxicant Use. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1984.
Marijuana and Health. Report of a Study by a Committee of the Institute of Medicine, Division of Health Sciences Policy, Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1982.
E. Josephson, “Trends in Adolescent Marihuana Use,” in Drug Use: Epidemiological and Sociological Approaches, E. Josephson and E. E. Carroll, eds., Washington, DC, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1974.
Marihuana and Health. Sixth Annual Report to the Congress from the Secretary of Health, Education,and Welfare, 1976. DHEW Publication No. (ADM)77–443, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1977.
L. N. Robins et al., “Vietnam Veterans Three Years after Vietnam: How our Study Changed our View of Heroin,” in Problems of Drug Dependence, L. Harris, ed., Richmond, Virginia: Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence, 1977.
C. P. Herman and L. T. Kozlowski, “Indulgence, Excess, and Restraint: Perspectives on Consummatory Behavior in Everyday Life,” in Control over Intoxicant Use: Pharmacological, Psychological, and Social Considerations, N. E. Zinberg and W. M. Harding, eds., New York, Human Sciences Press, 1982, 77–88.
Drug Use in America: Problem in Perspective. Second Report of the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1973.
N. E. Zinberg and J. A. Robertson, Drugs and the Public, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1972.
N. E. Zinberg, W. N. Harding, and M. Winkeller, “A Study of Social Regulatory Mechanisms in Controlled Illicit Drug Users,” Journal of Drug Issues 7, 1977, 117–133.
N. E. Zinberg, R. C. Jacobson, and W. M. Harding, “Social Sanctions and Rituals as a Basis for Drug Abuse Prevention,” American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2,1975, 165–181.
N. E. Zinberg and J. V. DeLong, “Research and the Drug Issue,” Contemporary Drug Problems 3, 1974, 71–100.
D. Maloff et al., “Informal Controls and Their Influence on Substance Use,” in Control over Intoxicant Use: Pharmacological, Psychological, and Social Considerations, N. E. Zinberg and W. M. Harding, eds., New York, Human Sciences Press, 1982.
Zinberg, Harding, and Winkeller, op. cit.
W. M. Harding and N. E. Zinberg, “The Effectiveness of the Subculture in Developing Rituals and Social Sanctions for Controlled Drug Use,” in Drugs, Rituals and Altered States of Consciousness, B. M. du Toit, ed., Rotterdam, Netherlands, A. A. Balkema, 1977, 111–133.
Zinberg, op. cit.
. N. Boris, N. E. Zinberg, and M. Boris, “Social Education for Adolescents,” Psychiatric Opinion 15, 1978, 32–37.
Drug Abuse Films, Washington, DC, National Coordinating Council on Drug Education, 1973.
US Cabinet Committee on Drug Abuse Prevention, Treatment, and Rehabilitation. Recommendations for Future Federal Activities in Drug Abuse Prevention. Report of the Subcommittee on Prevention, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1977.
P. M. Wald and A. Abrams, “Drug Education,” in Dealing with Drug Abuse: A Report to the Ford Foundation, New York, Praeger Publishers, 1972.
M. S. Goodstadt, Myths and Mythologies in Drug Education: A Critical Review of the Research Evidence. Research on Methods and Programs of Drug Education, Toronto, Addiction Research Foundation of Ontario, 1974.
B. Swift, N. Dorn, and A. Thompson, Evaluation of Drug Education: Findings of a National Research Study of Effects on Secondary School Students of Five Types of Lessons Given by Teachers, London, Institute for the Study of Drug Dependence, 1974.
Yankelovich, Skelly, and White, Inc. Students and Drugs: A Report of the Drug Abuse Council, Washington, DC, Drug Abuse Council, 1975.
R. E. Mogar and C. Savage, “Personality Change Associated with Psychedelic (LSD) Therapy: A Preliminary Report.” Psychotherapy Theory and Research Practice 1, 1954, 154–162.
E. S. Robbins, W. A. Frosch, and M. Stern, “Further Observations on Untoward Reactions to LSD,” American Journal of Psychiatry 124, 1967, 393–401.
A. Huxley, The Doors of Perception, New York, Harper and Row, 1954.
A. T. Weil, The Natural Mind, Boston, Houghton Mifflin, 1972.
Robbins, Frosch, and Stern, op. cit.
Drug Use in America, op. cit.
W. H. McGlothlin and D. O. Arnold, “LSD Revisited: A Ten-Year Followup of Medical LSD,” Archives of General Psychiatry 24, 1971, 35–49.
H. L. Barr et al., LSD: Personality and Experience, New York, WileyInterscience, 1972.
H. S. Becker, “History, Culture, and Subjective Experience: An Exploration of the Social Bases of Drug-Induced Experiences,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 8, 1967, 163–176.
Robins et al., op. cit.
N. E. Zinberg, “Heroin Use in Vietnam and the United States: A Contrast and Critique,” Archives of General Psychiatry 26, 1972, 486–498.
Robins et al., op. cit.
C. P. O’Brien, “Experimental Analysis of Conditioning Factors in Human Narcotic Addiction,” Pharmacological Review 27, 1975, 535–543.
C. P. O’Brien, personal communication, 1978.
N. E. Zinberg, “The Search for Rational Approaches to Heroin Use,” in Addiction: A Comprehensive Treatise, P. G. Boume, ed., New York, Academic Press, 1974.
L. N. Robins and J. E. Helzer, “Drug Use among Vietnam Veterans: Three Years Later,” Medical World News, October 27, 1975.
Robins et al., op. cit., 1977.
N. E. Zinberg, “G.I.’s and O.J.’s in Vietnam,” The New York Times Magazine Section, December 5, 1971.
Accident Facts—1981, Chicago, Illinois, National Safety Council, 1982.
N. E. Zinberg, “Alcohol Addiction: Toward a More Comprehensive Definition,” in Dynamic Approaches to the Understanding and Treatment of Alcoholism, M. H. Bean and N. E. Zinberg, ed., New York, Free Press, 1981, 97–127.
Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding. First Report of the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1972.
Drug Use in America, op. cit.
Domestic Council Drug Abuse Task Force, White Paper on Drug Abuse: A Report to the President, September 1975, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1975.
Strategy Council on Drug Abuse, Federal Strategy for Drug Abuse and Drug Traffic Prevention, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1976.
Report to the President, from the President’s Commission on Mental Health, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1978.
Drug Use in America, op. cit.
Marijuana and Health, op. cit.
Marihuana Survey—State of Oregon, Washington, DC, Drug Abuse Council, January 28, 1977.
Impact Study of S.B. 95, California Health and Welfare Agency, Office of Narcotics and Drug Abuse, 1976.
An Evaluation of the Decriminalization of Marihuana in Maine, Augusta, Maine, Office of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Prevention, 1978.
Maine: A Time/Cost Analysis of the Decriminalization of Marihuana in Maine, Augusta, Maine, Office of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Prevention, 1979.
Marijuana and Health, op. cit.
Zinberg, op. cit., 1984.
Szasz, op. cit.
J. Kaplan, “Practical Problems of Heroin Maintenance,” in Control over Intoxicant Use: Pharmacological, Psychological, and Social Considerations, N. E. Zinberg and W. M. Harding, eds., New York, Human Sciences Press, 1982, 159–172.
M. H. Moore, “Limiting Supplies of Drugs to Illicit Markets,” in Control over Intoxicant Use: Pharmacological, Psychological, and Social Considerations, N. E. Zinberg and W. M. Harding, eds., New York, Human Sciences Press, 1982, 183–200.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 The Humana Press Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zinberg, N.E. (1984). The Social Dilemma of the Development of a Policy on Intoxicant Use. In: Murray, T.H., Gaylin, W., Macklin, R. (eds) Feeling Good and Doing Better. Contemporary Issues in Biomedicine, Ethics, and Society. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5168-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5168-2_3
Publisher Name: Humana Press
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9594-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5168-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive