Skip to main content

Evaluation and Interpretation of Carcinogenesis Bioassay Results

  • Chapter
Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis Testing

Part of the book series: Contemporary Biomedicine ((CB,volume 4))

Abstract

Although various approaches to carcinogenesis testing have been proposed [e. g., Weisburger and Williams (1)] involving short-term in vitro tests and limited or short-term in vivo tests using a tumorigenic endpoint, chronic carcinogenesis bioassay in animals is still the method most commonly used to detect the potential carcinogenicity of chemicals to humans. These bioassay methods have various levels of sophistication, sensitivity, and predictability. The tests are usually performed in mice and rats because of their relatively short lifespan, their known historical control-tumor incidence, their cost, and their availability relative to other species. The results of these tests are used for species and dose extrapolation and as a measure, or more properly an indication, of the potential risk to humans of the compound tested, as well as a means of evaluating the relative carcinogenic activity of chemicals within a specific biological testing system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Weisburger, J. H., and Williams, G. M., Science 214, 401 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chu, K. C., Cueto, C., and Ward, J. M., J. Toxicol. Environ. Hlth. 8, 251 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arcos, J. C., Argus, M. F., and Wolf, G., Chemical Introduction of Cancer, vol. 1, New York, Academic Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berenblum, I. (ed.), Carcinogenicity Testing (UICC Technical Report Series, Vol. 2), Geneva International Union Against Cancer, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Canadian Health and Welfare, The Testing of Chemicals for Carcinogenicity, Mutagenicity and Teratogenicity, Ottawa, Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Golberg, L. (ed.), Carcinogenesis Testing of Chemicals, Cleveland, CRC Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sontag, J. M., Page, N. P., and Saffioti, U., Guidelines for Carcinogen Bioassay in Small Rodents, Bethesda, DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 76–801, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Page, N. P., Concepts of a Bioassay Program in Environmental Carcinogenesis, in Kraybill, H., and Mehlman, M. C. (eds.); Environmental Cancer, New York, Wiley, 1977, pp. 87–171.

    Google Scholar 

  9. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Monographs on the Long-Term and Short-Term Screening Assays for Carcinogens: A Critical Appraisal, Geneva World Health Organization, 1980. Supplement 2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Environmental Protection Agency: Proposed Guidelines for Registering Pesticides in the US.: Hazards Evaluation, Federal Register 43 (163), 37336 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Environmental Protection Agency: Proposed Good Laboratory Practice Guidelines for Toxicology Testing, Federal Register 45 (77), 26373 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Interagency Regulatory Liaison Group: Scientific bases for identification of potential carcinogens and estimation of risks, Federal Register 44 (131), 39858 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Food and Drug Administration, Non-clinical Laboratory Studies: Good Laboratory Practice Regulations, Federal Register 43 (248), 59886 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  14. National Cancer Institute: Bioassy of Nitrofen for Possible Carcinogenicity, Technical Report Series No. 26, Bethesda, DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 78–826, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  15. National Cancer Institute, Bioassay of Dibromochloropropane for Possible Carcinogenicity, Technical Report Series No. 28, Bethesda, DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 78–828, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Cancer Institute, Bioassay of 1,2-Dichloroethane for Possible Carcinogenicity, Technical Report Series No. 55, Bethesda, DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 78–1361, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. National Cancer Institute, Bioassay of Endosulfan for Possible Carcinogenicity, Technical Report Series No. 62, Bethesda, DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 78–1312, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  18. National Cancer Institute, Bioassay of Tris (2,3-dibrompropyl) Phosphate for Possible Carcinogenicity, Technical Report Series No. 86, Bethesda, DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 78–1326, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  19. National Cancer Institute, Bioassay of 1,2-Dibromoethane for Possible Carcinogenicity. Technical Report Series No. 86, Bethesda, DHEW Publication No. 78–1336, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  20. International Agency for Reseach on Cancer: Monographs on Industrial Processes Associated with Cancer in Humans, Geneva, World Health Organization, 1979, Supplement 1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ward, J. M., Goodman, D. G., Griesemer, R. A., Hardisty, J. F., Schueler, J. D., Squire, R. A., and Strandberg, J. D., J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. 2, 371 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  22. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare: Report of the Secretary’s Commission on Pesticides and Their Relationship to Environmental Health, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Squire, R. A., and Levitt, M., Cancer Res. 35, 3214 (1975).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaplan, E. L., and Meier, P., J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 53, 457 (1958).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cox, D. R., J. R. Stat. Soc. B34, 187 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tarone, R. E., Biometriks 62, 679 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cox, D. R., Analysis of Binary Data, London, Methuen, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Armitage, P., Statistical Methods in Medical Research, New York, Wiley, 1971, pp. 362–365.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thomas, D. G., Breslow, N., and Gart, J. J., Comput. Biomed. Res. 10, (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fears, T. R., Tarone, R. E., and Chu, K. C., Cancer Res. 37, 1941 (1977).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tarone, R. E., Chu, K. C., and Ward, J. M., J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 66, 1175 (1981).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. National Cancer Institute: Bioassay of Chloramben for Possible Carcinogenicity, Technical Report Series No. 25, Bethesda, DHEW Publications No. (NIH) 77–825, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Griesemer, R. A., and Cueto, C.: Toward a Classification Scheme for Degrees of Experimental Evidence for Carcinogenicity of Chemicals for Animals, in Montesano, R., Bartsch, H., and Tomatis, L. (eds)., Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Carcinogen Screening Tests, Lyon (IARC Scientific Publication No. 27 ), 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Staffa, J. A., and Mehlman, M. A. (eds.), Innovations in Cancer Risk Assessment (ED o1 Study), Pathotex Publishers, Park Forest South, Illinois, 1979, pp. 1–246.

    Google Scholar 

  35. SOT, Society of Toxicology EDo1 Task Force Symposium, Fund. appl. Toxicol. 1, 26 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Squire, R. A., Science 214, 877 (1981).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 The HAMANA Press Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cueto, C. (1984). Evaluation and Interpretation of Carcinogenesis Bioassay Results. In: Douglas, J.F. (eds) Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis Testing. Contemporary Biomedicine, vol 4. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5164-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5164-4_10

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9592-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5164-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics