Abstract
INTERNIST-I is an experimental computer program capable of making multiple and complex diagnoses in internal medicine. It differs from most other programs for computer-assisted diagnosis in the generality of its approach and the size and diversity of its knowledge base. To document the strengths and weaknesses of the program we performed a systematic evaluation of the capabilities of INTERNIST-I. Its performance on a series of 19 clinicopathological exercises (Case Records of the Massachusetts General Hospital) published in the Journal appeared qualitatively similar to that of the hospital clinicians but inferior to that of the case discussants. The evaluation demonstrated that the present form of the program is not sufficiently reliable for clinical applications. Specific deficiencies that must be overcome include the program’s inability to reason anatomically or temporally, its inability to construct differential diagnoses spanning multiple problem areas, its occasional attribution of findings to improper causes, and its inability to explain its “thinking.” (N Engl J Med. 1982; 307:468–76.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Wardle A, Wardle L. Computer aided diagnosis—a review of research.Methods Inf Med. 1978; 17:15–28.
Wagner G, Tautu P, Wolber U. Problems of medical diagnosis—a bibliography.Methods Inf Med. 1978; 17:55–74.
Shortliffe EH, Buchanan BG, Feigenbaum EA. Knowledge engineering for medical decision making: a review of computer-based clinical decision aids.Proc IEEE. 1979; 67:1207–24.
de Dombal FT, Leaper DJ, Staniland JR, McCann AP, Horrocks JC. Computer-aided diagnosis of abdominal pain.Br Med J. 1972; 2:9–13.
Yu VL, Fagan LM, Wraith SM, et al. Antimicrobial selection by computer. JAMA. 1979; 242:1279–82.
Pople HE, Myers JD, Miller RA. DIALOG: a model of diagnostic logic for internal medicine. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Publications, 1975:848–55.
Myers JD, Pople HE, Miller RA. INTERNIST: can artificial intelligence help? In: Connelly, Benson, Burke, Fenderson, eds. Clinical decisions and laboratory use. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982:251–69.
Pople HE. Heuristic methods for imposing structure on ill-structured problems: the structuring of medical diagnostics. In: Szolovits P, ed. Artificial intelligence in medicine, AAAS Symposium Series, Boulder, Colo.: West- view Press, 1982:119–85.
Winston PH. Artificial intelligence. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1977.
Nilsson NJ. Principles of artificial intelligence. Palo Alto: Tioga Publishing Co., 1980.
Case Records of the Massachusetts General Hospital (Case 30-1969).N Engl J Med. 1969; 281:206–13.
Feinstein AR. Clinical biostatistics XXXIX: the haze of Bayes, the aerial palaces of decision analysis, and the computerized Ouija board.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1977;21:482–96.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miller, R.A., Pople, H.E., Myers, J.D. (1985). INTERNIST-I, An Experimental Computer-Based Diagnostic Consultant for General Internal Medicine. In: Reggia, J.A., Tuhrim, S. (eds) Computer-Assisted Medical Decision Making. Computers and Medicine. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5108-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5108-8_8
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9567-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5108-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive