Skip to main content

Influence of Touch and Preferences for Control on Visual Behavior and Subjective Responses

  • Chapter
Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Social Psychology ((SSSOC))

Abstract

In the context of a familiar and well-defined relationship, the meaning of interpersonal touch is usually clear to the person who is touched. In an unfamiliar relationship, however, various motives may account for the touching behavior. Personal motives that may underlie such touching include the wish to convey warmth and affection (e.g., Nguyen, Heslin, & Nguyen, 1975), sexual desire or sexual harassment (e.g., Gutek, Nakamura, Gahart, Handschumacher, & Russell, 1980), and interpersonal dominance (e.g., Henley, 1977), or social control (Patterson, 1983). An interpersonal touch that includes multiple motives evokes uncertainty in the recipient about how to react. The touch recipient may feel both flattered and wary. Concern is likely to derive from doubt as to whether the touch was spontaneous and free of ulterior motives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bond, M. H. (1972). Effect of an impression set on subsequent behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 301–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coutts, L. M., Schneider, F. W., & Montgomery, S. (1980). An investigation of the arousal model of interpersonal intimacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 545–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davitz, J. (1969). The language of emotion. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. (1968). Nonverbal behavior in psychological research. In H. Shlien (Ed.), Research in psychotherapy. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, P. D., Carlsmith, J. M., & Henson, A. (1972). The stare as a stimulus to flight in human subjects: A series of field experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 301–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, P. D., & Langer, E. J. (1976). Staring and approach: An interpretation of the stare as a nonspecific activator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellyson, S., Dovidio, J., & Corson, R. (1981). Visual behavior differences in females as a function of self-perceived expertise. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellyson, S., Dovidio, J., Corson, R., & Vinicur, D. (1980). Visual dominance behavior in female dyads: Situational and personality factors. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 328–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellyson, S., Dovido, J., & Fehr, B. (1981). Visual behavior and dominance in women and men. In C. Mayo & N. Henley (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior(pp. 63–80 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exline, R. (1972). Visual interaction: The glances of power and preferences. In J. Coles (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exline, R., Ellyson, S., & Long, B. (1975). Visual behavior as an aspect of power role relationships. In P. Pilner & T. Alloway (Eds.), Advances in the study of communication and affect(Vol. 2, pp. 21–52 ). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J., Rytting, M., & Heslin, R. (1976). Affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. Sociometry, 59, 416–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forden, C. (1981). The influence of sex-role expectations on the perception of touch. Sex Roles, 7, 889–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I., & Ramsey, S. (1976). Nonverbal maintenance of traditional sex roles. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., Nakamura, C. Y., Gahart, M., Handschumacher, I., & Russell, D. (1980). Sexuality and the workplace. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K., & Devore I. (1965). Baboon social behavior. In I. Devore (Ed.), Primate behavior: Field studies of monkeys and apes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. (1973). Status and sex: Some touching observations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 91–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. (1977). Body politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ickes, W., Patterson, M. L., Rajecki, D. W., & Tanford, S. (1982). Behavioral and cognitive consequences of reciprocal versus compensatory responses to pre-interaction expectancies. Social Cognition, 7 (2), 160–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFrance, M., & Mayo, C. (1978). Moving bodies: Nonverbal communication in social relationships. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1981). Gender patterns in touching behavior. In C. Mayo & N. Henley (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior(pp. 15–38 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, C., & Henley, N. (1981). Nonverbal behavior: Barrier or agent of sex-role change? In C. Mayo & N. Henley (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior(pp. 3–14 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T., Heslin, R., & Nguyen, M. (1975). The meanings of touch: Sex differences. Journal of Communication, 25, 92–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1976). An arousal model of interpersonal intimacy. Psychological Review, 83, 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1982). A sequential functional model of nonverbal exchange. Psychological Review, 89, 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1983). Nonverbal behavior: A Junctional perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. L. (1984). Intimacy, social control, and nonverbal involvement. In V. J. Derlega (Ed.), Communication, intimacy, and close relationships(pp. 105–132 ). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, N., & Geis, F. (1981). Women and nonverbal leadership cues: When seeing is not believing. In C. Mayo & N. Henley (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior(pp. 39–57 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, D. J., Hastorf, A. H., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1979). Person perception. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, W. (1958). FIRO: A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitcher, S., & Fisher, J. (1979). Multidimensional reaction to therapeutic touch in a hospital setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 87–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Whitehurst, T.C., Derlega, V.J. (1985). Influence of Touch and Preferences for Control on Visual Behavior and Subjective Responses. In: Ellyson, S.L., Dovidio, J.F. (eds) Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5106-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5106-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9566-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5106-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics