Skip to main content

The Nonverbal Semantics of Power and Gender: A Perceptual Study

  • Chapter
Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Social Psychology ((SSSOC))

Abstract

Surely one of the more exasperating consequences of changing social mores is the absence of behavioral norms for many circumstances that once were clearly programmed, such as, in the case of changing gender relations, opening doors, arranging dates, or paying restaurant bills. This is probably the level on which most of us are conscious of these changing mores; but deeper questions of relations between women and men are involved, ones of power and authority in the home and at work, for which there are still no clear norms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brown, R. (1965). Social psychology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language(pp. 253–276 ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1967). Stereotypes and the perception of group differences. American Psychologist, 22, 817–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condry, J., & Condry, S. (1976). Sex differences: A study of the eye of the beholder. Child Development, 47, 812–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frances, S. J. (1979). Sex differences in nonverbal behavior. Sex Roles, 5, 519–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I. H., & Ramsey, S. J. (1976). Nonverbal maintenance of traditional sex roles. Journal of Social Issues,32, 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967). The nature of deference and demeanor. In Interaction ritual(pp. 47–95 ). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1979). Gender, gender-roles and nonverbal communication skills. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences(pp. 32–67 ). Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. M. (1973). Power, sex and nonverbal communication. Berkeley Review of Sociology, 18, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. H., & Nie, N. H. (1981). SPSS update 7-9. New procedures and facilities for releases 7-9. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFranee, M., & Mayo, C. (1979). A review of nonverbal behaviors of women and men. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 43, 96–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B. (1981). Gender patterns in touching behavior. In C. Mayo & N. M. Henley (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior(pp. 15–37 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, C., & Henley, N. M. (Eds.) (1981). Gender and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulac, A., & Torborg, L. L. (1980). Differences in perceptions created by syntactic- semantic productions of male and female speakers. Communication Monographs, 47, 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. D., Heslin, R., & Nguyen, M. L. (1975). The meaning of touch: Sex differences. Journal of Communication, 25, 92–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & DePaulo, B. M. (1979). Sex differences in accommodation in nonverbal communication. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences(pp. 68–103 ). Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., Hall, J. A., DiMatteo, M. R., Rogers, P. L., & Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B., Tesser, A., & Powell, E. (1982). Dominance cues in nonverbal behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 114–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, R. (1969). Personal space: The behavioral basis of design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stier, D. S., & Hall, J. A. (1984). Gender differences in touch: An empirical and theoretical review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 440–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summerhayes, D. L., & Suchner, R. W. (1978). Power implications of touch in male-female relationships. Sex Roles, 4, 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. (1974). Male-female encounter: Fresh constructions. In J. Spiegel & P. Machotka, Messages of the body(pp. 307–341 ). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henley, N.M., Harmon, S. (1985). The Nonverbal Semantics of Power and Gender: A Perceptual Study. In: Ellyson, S.L., Dovidio, J.F. (eds) Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5106-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5106-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9566-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5106-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics