Advertisement

Cardiac Valve Identification Atlas and Guide

  • Dryden Morse
  • Robert M. Steiner

Keywords

Aortic Valve Mitral Valve Valve Replacement Cardiac Valve Radiographic Characteristic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Karp RB, Kirklin JW, Kouchoukos NT, Pacifico A: Comparison of three devices to replace the aortic valve. Circulation 49/50 (Suppl II): 163–169, 1974Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chun PKC, Nelson WP: Common cardiac prosthetic valves. JAMA 238: 401, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Rourke RA, Peterson KL, Braunwald N; Post-operative hemodynamic evaluation of a new fabric-covered ball-valve prosthesis. Curculation 47/48 (Suppl III): 4–79, 1973.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hallman GL, Messmer BJ, Elkadi A, et al.: Clinical experience with the Wada-Cutter cardiac valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 10: 9–19, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bjork VO: Experience with the Wada-Cutter valve in the aortic area. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 60: 26–33, 1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hylen JC: Mechanical malfunction and thrombosis of prosthetic heart valve. Am J Cardiol 30: 396–404, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Macmanus Q, Grunkemeier G, Lambert L, Starr A: Non-cloth covered caged ball prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 76: 788–794, 1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wain WH, Drury PJ, Ross EN: Aortic valve replacement with Starr-Edwards™ valves over 14 years. Ann Thorac Surg 35: 562–569, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hodam R, Starr A, Herr R, Pierie W: Early clinical experience with cloth covered valvular prostheses. Ann Surg 170: 471, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shean F, Austen W, Buckley M, Mundth E, Scannell J, Daggett W: Survival after Starr-Edwards aortic valve replacement. Circulation 44: 1–8, 1971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hambry RI, Lee RL, Aintablian A, Wisoff BG: Cinefluorographic study of the aortic ball cage prosthetic valve. Am J Cardiol 34: 276–283, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Macmanus Q, Grunkemeier G, Thomas D, Lambert L, Starr A: The Starr-Edwards model 6000 valve. Circulation 56: 623–626, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller DC, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Reitz BA, Jamieson SW, Baumgartner WA, Mitchell RS, Shumway NE: Ten to fifteen year reassessment of the performance characteristics of the Starr- Edwards™ model 6120 mitral valve prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 85: 1–20, 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sala A, Schoevaerdts JC, Jaumin P, Ponlot R, Chalant CH: Review of 387 isolated mitral valve replacements by the model 6120 Starr-Edwards™ prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 84: 744–750, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Starr A: Early and late results of mitral valve replacement. Presented at the International Symposium on the Mitral Valve, Hotel del Coronado, Coronado, Calif., Oct. 21–24, 1982.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Williams JB, et al.: Considerations in selection and management of patients undergoing valve replacement with glutaraldehyde-fixed porcine bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 30: 247–258, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Oyer, PE, Stinson, EB, Miller DC, Jamieson SW, Reitz BA, Baumgartner W, Shumway NE: Clinical Analysis of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis. In Cohn LH, Gallucci V (eds): Cardiac Bioprostheses. New York, Yorke Medical, pp 539–551, 1982.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Duran CMG, Gallo I, Ruiz B, Revuelta JM, Ochoteco A: A thousand bioprostheses revisited. Do they conform with the expected pattern? Ibid, pp 35–41.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    DiSesa VJ, Collins Jr J J, Cohn LH: Valve replacement in the small annulus aorta. Performance of the Hancock Modified Orifice Bioprosthesis. Ibid, pp 552–558.Google Scholar
  20. 3.
    Carlson C, Collins J, Ockene I, Cohn L, Dalen J: Mitral regurgitation due to intermittent prosthetic valve dysfunction, (unpublished manuscript)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Edgett J, Nelson W, Hall R, Jahnke E, Aaby G: A complication of valve replacement by a caged-lens prosthesis. Circulation 36: 422, 1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Winsberg F, Gabor G, Hernberg J, Weiss B: Fluttering of the mitral valve in aortic insufficiency. Circulation 41: 225, 1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mithna AS, Matisonn RE, leRoux BT, Chester E: Clinical experience with the Lillehei-Kaster cardiac valve prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 72: 401–407, 1976.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lillehei CW, Kaster, RL, Coleman M, Bloch JH: Heart valve replacement with the Lillehei-Kaster pivoting disc prosthesis. NY State J Med 74: 1426, 1974.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roberts WC, Buckely BA, Morrow AC: Pathologic anatomy of cardiac valve replacement. Progr Cardiovasc Dis 15: 539, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kaster RL, et al: Pivoting disc heart valve prosthesis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 16: 233–243, 1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nitter-Hauge S, Enge I, Hall KV: The Hall-Kaster valve in aortic position. Presented at the American Heart Association’s 51st Scientific Sessions, Nov. 1978, Dallas, Texas.Google Scholar
  28. Vardan S, Warner R, Kookherjee S, Mead M, Obeid AI: Echo and phonocardiography studies in patients with Lillehei-Kaster aortic valve prosthesis. Jpn Heart J 20: 277–288 (May) 1979.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Borst, HG, Papagiannakis N, Beddermann C, Oelert H: Cardiac valve replacement: problems solved and unsolved. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 27: 76–83, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scotten LN, Racca RG, Nugent AH, Walker DK, Brownlee RT: New tilting disc cardiac valve prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 82: 136–146, 1981.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huffstutler MC Jr: Analytical design fundamentals of the Omniscience cardiac-valve prosthesis. Presented at the ASTM-Symposium, Titanium and Its Alloys for Surgical Implants, Phoenix, Ariz., May 1981.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Huffstutler MC Jr: Scientific evaluation of in-vitro performance of the Omniscience cardiac valve. Presentation at the 34th Annual Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology at Houston, Tex., September 1981.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kokler J: In vitro comparison of heart valves with plain and curved pendulum discs. Cardiovascular Surgery 1980, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981, p. 70.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    DeWall RA, Hicks GL, Jr, Schuster B, Pelletier C, Bonan R, Martineau JP, Panebianco A, Yip LC, Sinclair M: Five-year clinical experience with the Omniscience cardiac valve. Presentation at the 20th Anniversary Meeting of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Antonio, Tex., January 23–25, 1984.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    DeWall RA, Makhail AA: Omniscience™ cardiac valve prosthesis clinical review I. Presented at the American College of Cardiology at Snowmass, Colo., Jan. 12–16,1981, and the Fifth Congress of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia at Madras, I.dia, Feb. 14, 1981.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nitter-Hauge S, Enge I, Hall KV: The Hall-Kaster valve in the aortic position: primary results including hemodynamic studies. Presented at the American Heart Association 51st Scientific Sessions. November 1978, Dallas, Texas.Google Scholar
  37. Starek, PJK, Murray FF, Keagy BA, Wilcox BR: Clinical experience with the Hall pivoting disc valve. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (special issue II ) 31: 66, May 1983.Google Scholar
  38. Beaudet RL, Poirier NL, Guerraty AJ, Doyle D: Fifty-four months’ experience with an improved tilting disc valve (Medtronic-Hall). Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (special issue II ) 31: 89, May 1983.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Semb BKH, Nitter-Hauge S, Hall KV: The Hall-Kaster disc valve prosthesis: clinical and hemodynamic observations in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Surg 21: 387–395, 1980.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schachner A, Vidne B, Levy MJ: Retrograde dislodgment of a Cross-Jones mitral valve occluder. Scand Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13: 263–65, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Edgett JW, Nelson WP, Hall RJ, Starr A, Guswold HE: A complication of valve replacement by a caged lens prosthesis. Circulation 36: 422, 1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chun PKC, Nelson NP: Common cardiac prosthetic valves. JAMA 238: 401, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cross F, Akao M, Jones R: Comparison of Ballard lens heart valve prosthesis. Surgery 62: 797–806, 1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Castanedo-Zuniga W, et al.: In vivo radiographic appearance of the St. Jude valve prosthesis. Radiology 134: 775–776, 1980.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Duncan JM, et al.: The St. Jude Medical valve. Early clinical results in 253 patients. Tex Heart Inst J 10 (1): 11–16, 1985.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zerbini EJ: Personal communication.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fernandez J: Personal communication.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nunoconciecao A, Puig L, Verginelli G, Iryia K, Bittencourt D, Zerbini EJ: Homologous dura mater cardiac valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 70: 499–508, 1975.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chun PKC, Nelson NP: Common cardiac prosthetic valves. JAMA 238: 401, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wellons HA, Stranch, R, Nolan S, et al: Isolated mitral valve replacement with the Kay-Shiley disc valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 70: 862–868, 1975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chun PKC, Nelson WP: Common prosthetic cardiac valves. JAMA 238: 401–403, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kay JH: Discussion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 70: 868, 1975.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bjork VO, Henze A, Hindmarsh T: Radiopaque marker in the tilting disc of the Bjork-Shiley heart valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 73: 563–69, 1977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Aberg B, Henze A: Comparison between the in vitro flow dynamics of the standard and the convexo-concave Bjork-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13: 177–189, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Daenen W, Nevelsteen A, van Cauwelaert P.: Nine years’ experience with the Bjork-Shiley prosthetic valve: Early and late results of 932 valve replacements. Ann Thorac Surg. 35: 651, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Chun PKC, Rajfer SI, Donohue DJ, Bowen TE, Davia JE: Bjork- Shiley mitral valvular dehiscence. Am Heart J 99: 229–232, 1980.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Douglas JE, Williams JD: Echocardiographic evaluation of the Bjork-Shiley valve. Circulation 30: 52–57, 1974.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Saunders CR, Rossi N, Rittenhouse E: Failure of a Bjork-Shiley mitral valve prosthesis to open: clinical recognition. J Cardiovasc Surg 18: 571–574, 1977.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Bjork VO, Henze A, Hindmarsh T: Radiopaque marker in the tilting disc of the Bjork-Shiley heart valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 7: 563–569, 1977.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Daenen W, Nevelsteen A, van Cauwelaert P: Nine years’ experience with the Bjork-Shiley prosthetic valve: Early and late results of 932 valve replacements. Ann Thorac Surg 35: 651, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Aberg B, Henze A: Comparison between the in vitro flow dynamics of the standard and the convexo-concave Bjork-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 13: 177–189, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Shiley Inc., in-house studies.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Fernandez J, Morse D, Maranhao V, Gooch A: Results of use of the pyrolytic carbon tilting disc Bjork-Shiley aortic prosthesis. Chest 65: 640–645, 1974.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Bernal-Ramirez JA, Phillips JH: Echocardiographic study of malfunction of the Bjork-Shiley prosthetic heart valve in the mitral position. Am J Cardiol 40: 449–452, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Chun PKC, Rajfer SI, Donohue DJ, Bowen TE, Davia JE: Bjork- Shiley mitral valvular dehiscence. Am Heart J 99: 230–234, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Bjork V, Henze A: Ten years’ experience with the Bjork-Shiley tilting disc valve. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 78: 331–340, 1979.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Fernandez J: Discussion of ref. 4. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 78: 341, 1979.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Marshall WG Jr, Kauchoukos NT, Pollack SB, Bradley EL: Early results of valve replacement with the Bjork-Shiley convexo-concave prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 37(5).Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    See chapter by Fernandez.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Bernal-Ramirez JA, Phillips JH: Echocardiographic study of malfunction of the Bjork-Shiley prosthetic heart valve in the mitral position. Am J Cardiol 40: 449–452, 1977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Chun PKC, Rajfer SI, Donohue DJ, Bowen TE, Davia JE: Bjork- Shiley mitral valvular dehiscence. Am Heart J 99: 230–234, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Bjork V, Henze A: Ten years’ experience with the Bjork-Shiley tilting disc valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 78: 331 - 340, 1979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Fernandez J: Discussion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 78: 341, 1979.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    F.D.A. Drug Bulletin Dec., 1984.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Cohn, LH: Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock porcine xenograft. Ann Thoracic Surg 1976.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Hannah HR, Reis RL: Current status of porcine heterograft prostheses: A 5-year appraisal. Circulation 52 (Suppl 2): 30, 1975.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Morris DC, Wickliffe CW, King SB, et al: Hemodynamic evaluation of the porcine xenograft aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 37: 157, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Angell W, Angell J, Sywak A: The Angell-Shiley porcine xenograft. Ann Thorac Surg 28: 537–553, 1979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Silverton NP, Abdulali SA, Yakirevich VS, Tandon AP and Ionescu MI. Embolism, thrombosis and anticoagulant haemorrhage in mitral valve disease. A prospective study of patients having valve replacement with the Pericardial Xenograft. European Heart J 5: 19–25, 1984.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Ionescu MI, Tandon AP, Chidambaram M, Yakirevich VS and Silverton NP. Durability of the pericardial valve. European Heart J 5: 101–106, 1984.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Gonzalez-Lavin L, Chi S, Calvin Blair T, Jung HY, Fabaz AG, McFadden PM, Lewis B, Daughters G. Five-year experience with the Ionescue-Shiley bovine pericardial valve in the aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg 3 (36): 270–80, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Gonzalez-Lavin L, Tandon AP, Chi S, Calvin Blair T, McFadden PM, Lewis B, Daughters G, Ionescu MI. The risk of thromboembolism and haemorrhage following mitral valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 87 (3): 340–51, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Revuelta JM, Garcia-Rinaldi R, Johnston RH, Bonnington L, Ubago JL, Duran CG. The Ionescu-Shiley valve: A solution for the small aortic root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 88 (23): 234–37, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Garcia-Bengochea JB, Siebert MF, Carreno CI, Cendon AA, Alvarez JR. Clinical experience with the Ionescu-Shiley xeno-graft valve: Four to five-year follow-up.” Texas Heart J 9 (3): 285 - 92, 1982.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Brais MP, Bedard JP, Goldstein W, Koshal A, Keon WJ. Ionescu-Shiley Pericardial Xenografts: Follow-up of up to 6 years. Ann Thorac Surg 39 (2): 105–11, 1985.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Reul GJ, Cooley DA, Duncan JM, Frazier OH, Hallman GL, Livesay JJ, Ott DA, Walker WE. Valve Failure with the Ionescu-Shiley Bovine Pericardial Bioprosthesis: Analysis of 2,680 patients. J of Vase Surg 2 (l): 192–204, 1985.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Tandon AP, Smith Dr, Whitaker W, Ionescu MI. Long term haemodynamic evaluation of aortic pericardial xenograft. ” Br Heart J 40: 602, 1978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Bove EL, Helak JW, Potts JL, Marviasti MA, Eich RH, Parker FB. Postoperative hemodynamic evaluation of the Ionescu-Shiley prosthesis in the small aortic root. Cardiac Prostheses Symposium 187, 1982.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    McHenry M, Smeloff FEA, Fong W: Critical obstruction of prosthetic heart valves due to lipid absorption by Silastic. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 59: 413–425, 1970.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Hylen JC: Mechanical malfunction and thrombosis of prosthetic heart valves. Am J Cardiol 30: 396–404, 1972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Vanderveer J, Rhyneer G, Hodam R, et al: Obstruction of tricuspid ball valve prosthesis. Circulation 43 (Suppl): 62–67, 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dryden Morse
  • Robert M. Steiner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations