Summary
This chapter discusses the evolution of the basic legal doctrine which governs the legal relationships and devices which concern the impaired elderly, namely, informed consent, incompetency, guardianship, and protective services. Several social, economic, ethical, and demographic trends are causing actors in the legal system to examine how existing legal doctrine can be adapted to preserve autonomy and enhance self- determination for the impaired person. The creative and deliberate use of durable powers of attorney (where authorized by statute), natural death acts, and living wills, trusts, and joint bank accounts have the potential effect of extending the will and power of an individual into a time when such power would be relinquished by virtue of impairment. In addition, in states such as California, an extensive revision of guardianship statutes has been undertaken to ensure the application of the least-restrictive alternative doctrine in protective services. The evolution of legal doctrine and practice offers the promise of reversing what some might see as a trend toward excessive intrusion into the rights of the impaired person.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander, G.: Premature probate: A different perspective for guardianship in the elderly.Stanford Law Review 31, 1003 (1979).
Alexander, G., and Lewin, T.: The Aged and the Need for Surrogate Management. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1972.
California Probate Code, Division for Part IE, Section 1801 et seq. (1984).
Deutsch, A.: The Shame of the States. New York: Arno Press (c. 1948 ). 1973.
The disguised oppression of involuntary guardianship: Have the elderly the freedom to spend?Yale University Law Journal 73, 676 (1967).
Eckstein, R., and Lindey, E. (Eds.): Proceedings of First Seminar on Protective Services for Older People, held at Arden House, Harriman, NY, March 10–15, 1963. New York: National Council on the Aging, 1964.
Ferguson, E.: Protecting the Vulnerable Adult. Ann Arbor: Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan and Wayne State University, 1978.
Horstman, P.: Protective services for the elderly: The limits of parens patriae.Missouri Law Review 40, 215 (1975).
Lehmann, V., and Mathiasen, G. (Eds.): Guardianship and Protective Services for Older People. Washington, D.C.: NCOA Press, 1963.
O’Connor vs. Donaldson, 95 S. Ct. 2486 (1975).
Pennhurst State School and Hospital vs. Halderman, 451 U.S. 1, on remand 673 F2d 647, (1981).
Regan, J.: Adult Protective Services: An Appraisal and Prospectus. Portland: University of Southern Maine, National Law and Social Work Seminar, 1982.
Romeo vs. Youngberg, 457 v.s. 307 U.S. (1982).
Village of Belle Terre vs. Boraas, 416 U.S. 1 (1974).
Ward, M.: The Snake Pit. New York: Random House, 1946.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cohen, E.S. (1985). Evolutionary Changes in Legal Remedies for the Impaired Elderly. In: Gaitz, C.M., Niederehe, G., Wilson, N.L. (eds) Aging 2000: Our Health Care Destiny. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5062-3_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5062-3_31
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9546-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5062-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive