Skip to main content

Equity and Intimate Relations: Recent Research

  • Chapter
Compatible and Incompatible Relationships

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Social Psychology ((SSSOC))

Abstract

Equity theory is a social psychological theory concerned with justice in all interpersonal relationships. Until recently, however, equity principles have been examined only in casual role relations (i.e., employer-employee, philanthropist-recipient, and harmer-victim relations) and have not been examined in more personal relations (see Walster (Hatfield), Walster, & Berscheid, 1978). The distinction between role relationships and personal relationships is a long-standing and important one (see Cooley, 1902; Tonnies, 1887). Given the importance of primary, intimate relations, it would be a grave omission to overlook such relations in theory and research on interpersonal behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 2, pp. 267 – 299 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. S., & Freedman, S. (1976). Equity theory revisited: Comments and annotated bibliography. In L. Berkowitz & E. Hatfield-Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 9, pp. 43 – 90 ). Boston: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldous, J. (1969). Occupational characteristics and males’ role performance in the family. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 31, 707 – 712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angell, R. C. (1936). The family encounters the depression. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin’s (1974) Measure of Contentment/Distress. Reported in E. Hatfield-Walster, G. W. Walster, & E. Berscheid, Equity: Theory and research(p. 243 ). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W., & Walster (Hatfield), E. (1974a) Participants’ reactions to “Equity with the World,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 528 – 548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W., & Walster (Hatfield), E. (1974b). Reactions to confirmations and disconfirmations of expectancies of equity and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 208 – 216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1964). The adjustments of married mates. In J. T. Christensen (Ed.), Handbook of marriage and the family(pp. 675–739). Chicago: Rand McNally. 675 – 739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, J. (1972). The future of marriage. New York: World Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E., Hatfield, E., & Bohrnstedt, G. (1973). The body image report. Psychology Today, 7, 119 – 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannan, P. (Ed.) (1971). Divorce and after. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, E. (1945). Justice and the social order. London: Luderworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavan, R. S. (1959). Unemployment: Crisis of the common man. Marriage and Family Living, 21, 139 – 146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick-Jones, J. K. (1976). Social exchange theory: Its structure and influence in social psychology. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12 – 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, W. S. (1968). Gifts and nations. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douvan, E. (1974). Interpersonal relationships: Some questions and observations. Paper presented at the Raush Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1956). The art of loving. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, D. (1971). Who has the power? The marital struggle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 445 – 458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, D. C. (1964). Changes in liking as a means of reducing cognitive discrepancies between self-esteem and aggression. Journal of Personality, 32, 520 – 549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J. (1956). After divorce. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Hatfield (1978) Global Measure. Reported in E. Hatfield, M. K. Utne, & J. Traupmann, Equity theory and intimate relationships. In Robert L. Burgess & Ted L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships(p. 112 ). NY: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., & Traupmann, J. (1980). Intimate relationships: A perspective from Equity theory. In S. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Personal relationships I: Studying personal relationships(pp. 165 – 178 ). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., & Walster, G. W. (1979). Equity and extramarital sex. In M. Cook & G. Wilson (Eds.), Love and attraction: An international conference(pp. 323 – 334 ). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Utne, M. K., & Traupmann, J. (1979). Equity theory and intimate relationships. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships(pp. 99 – 133 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., Walster, G. W., & Traupmann, J. (1978). Equity and premarital sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 82-92. Reprinted in M. Cook and G. Wilson (Eds.), Love and attraction: An international conference(pp. 309–323). Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J., & Horton, T. (1981). An exchange orientation: Is it good for marriage? Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1976). Breakups before marriage: The end of 103 affairs. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 147 – 167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms(rev. ed.). New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, M., & Hunt, B. (1977). The divorce experience. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, R D. Jr. (1980). A Marxist perspective: The production of cooperative intimate relations. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarovsky, M. (1971). The unemployed man and his family. New York: Octagon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, W. J., & Jackson, D. D. (1968). The mirages of marriage. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In R Gergen, M. S., Greenberg, & R Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. New York: Picnum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobsenz, N. M., & Murstein, B. I. (1976, September). Keeping score: It’s fine for football games but disastrous for a marriage. Woman’s Day, 146 – 154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (1954). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, M. M. (1966). Courtship as social exchange: Some historical comparisons. In B. Farber (Ed.), Kinship and family organization(pp. 190 – 200 ). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1980). Exchange in communal relationships. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J., & Clark, M. S. (1980). Communal and exchange relationships. Paper presented at the 1980 meetings of the Society of Experimental Social Psychologists, Palo Alto, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I. (1978). Exploring intimate lifestyles. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I. (1980). The limit of exchange in equity theories. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I., & MacDonald, M. G. (1977). The relationship of “exchange orientation” and “commitment” scales to marriage adjustment. Unpublished manuscript, Connecticut College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B. I., MacDonald, M. G., & Cerreto, M. (1977). A theory of the effect of exchange-orientation on marriage and friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family 39, 543 – 548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napier, A. Y., & Whitaker, C. A. (1978). The family crucible. NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napolitane, C., & Pellegrino, B. (1977). Living and loving after divorce. New York: Rawson Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R. (1971). Families: Applications of social learning to family life. Champaign, IL: Research Press Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peplau, L. A. (1978). Power in dating relationships. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective(pp. 106 – 121 ). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z. (1973). Liking and loving: An invitation to social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sager, C. (1976). Marriage contracts and couple therapy. New York: Bruner-Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J. (1970). Opportunity and the family. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanzoni, J. (1972). Sexual bargaining: Power politics in the American marriage. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, R. B., & Keith, P. M. (1980). Equity and depression among married couples. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 430 – 435.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, R. B., & Keith, P. M. (1981). Equity in marital roles across the family life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 359 – 367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher-Fisher, S. (1980). Men, women, and intimate relationships: A study of dating couples. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storer, N. W. (1966). The social system of science. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J. T. (1974) Attributions, liking and power. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Foundations of interpersonal attraction(pp. 193 – 215 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. NY: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonnies, F. (1957). Community and society: gemeinschaft and gesellschaft. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press. (Original work published 1887 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Traupmann, J., & Hatfield, E. (1983). How important is marital fairness over the lifespan? International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 17, 89 – 101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Traupmann, J., Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1981). The importance of “fairness” for the marital satisfaction of older women. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traupmann, J., Hatfield, E., & Wexler, P. (1983). Equity and sexual satisfaction in dating couples. 22, 33 – 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traupmann, J., Peterson, R., Utne, M., & Hatfield, E. (1981). Measuring equity in intimate relations. Applied Psychological Measurement. 5, 467 – 480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Traupmann-Utne-Walster (1977) Scales. Available in E. Hatfield-Walster, G. W. Walster, & E. Berscheid, Equity: Theory and research (pp. 236–242). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1978. For reliability and validity information see Traupmann, J., Peterson, R., Utne, M., & Hatfield, E. Measuring equity in intimate relations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1981, 5, 467–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Traupmann, Utne, Hatfield (1978) Scales: Participants’ perceptions of equity/ inequity. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships(pp. 112 – 113 ). New York: Academic Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udry, J. R. (1971, September). Commentary. Sexual Behavior, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utne, M. K., Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., & Greenberger, D. (1984). Equity, marital satisfaction, and stability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utne, M. K., & Kidd, R. F. (1980). In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice in social interaction. Berne, Switzerland: Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Walster (1977) Global Measure. Described in E. Hatfield-Walster, G. W. Walster, & E. Berscheid. Equity: Theory and research(pp. 234–236). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, P. (1980). Intimacy: A critical social analysis. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hatfield, E., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, M., Hay, J. (1985). Equity and Intimate Relations: Recent Research. In: Ickes, W. (eds) Compatible and Incompatible Relationships. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5044-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5044-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9538-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-5044-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics