Advertisement

Questions, Answers and Responses: Interacting with Knowledge-Base Systems

  • Bonnie Lynn Webber
Part of the Topics in Information Systems book series (TINF)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to examine the character of information-seeking interactions between a user and a knowledge base system (KBS). In doing so, I advocate that a clear distinction be made between an answer to a question and a response. The chapter characterizes questions, answers, and responses, the role they play in effective information interchanges, and what is involved in facilitating such interactions between user and KBS.

Keywords

Money Market False Conclusion Treasury Bill Direct Answer Proof Tree 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [ALLE82]
    Allen, J., “Recognizing Intentions from Natural Language Utterances”, In M. Brady (editor), Computational Models of Discourse, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1982.Google Scholar
  2. [APPE85]
    Appelt, D., Planning English Sentences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge England, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [BBCK79]
    Brachman, R., Bobrow, R., Cohen, P., Klovstad, J., Webber, B. and Woods, W., “Research in Natural Language Understanding — Annual Report: 1 Sept 78–31 Aug 79”, Technical Report 4274, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc., August, 1979.Google Scholar
  4. [BKNT77]
    Bobrow, D.G., Kaplan, R.M., Norman, D.A., Thompson, H. and Winograd, T., “GUS, A Frame-Driven Dialog System”, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 8, pp. 155–173, 1977.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [BRAT83]
    Bratman, M., “Taking Plans Seriously”, Social Theory and Practice, 9: 271–287, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. [CARB85]
    Carberry, S., “A Pragmatics-based Approach to Understanding Intersentential Ellipses”, Proc. of the 23rd Annual Meeting, pages 188–197. Association for Computational Linguistics, University of Chicago, Chicago IL, July, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. [CASS85]
    Cassell, E.J., Talking with Patients, Volume I: The Theory of Doctor Patient Communication, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1985.Google Scholar
  8. [CHEI85]
    Cheikes, B., “Monitor Offers on a Dynamic Database: The search for relevance”, Technical Report CIS-85-43, Dept. of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, October, 1985.Google Scholar
  9. [CM82]
    Conklin, J. and McDonald, D., “Salience: the key to the selection problem in natural language generation”, Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting, pages 129–135. Assoc. for Computational Linguistics, University of Toronto, June, 1982.Google Scholar
  10. [COHE78]
    Cohen, P., “On Knowing What to Say: Planning Speech Acts”, Technical Report 118, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Toronto, January, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. [CORE85]
    Corella, F., “Semantic Retrieval and Levels of Abstraction”, In L. Kerschberg (editor), Expert Database Systems, Benjamin Cummings, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
  12. [DAVI79]
    Davis, R., “Interactive Transfer of Expertise”, Artificial Intelligence, 12 (2): 121–157, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [GAZD79]
    Gazdar, G., “A Solution to the Projection Problem”, in Oh, C.-K. and Dinneen, D. (editors), Syntax and Semantics, pages 57–90. Academic Press, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  14. [GOLD70]
    Goldman, A., A Theory of Human Action, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1970.Google Scholar
  15. [GREW83]
    Grewendorf, G., “What Answers can be Given?”, in F. Kiefer (editor), Questions and Answers, pages 45–84. D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1983.Google Scholar
  16. [GRIC75]
    Grice, H. P., “Logic and Conversation”, in P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (editors), Syntax and Semantics, Academic Press, New York, 1975.Google Scholar
  17. [HCR84]
    Hasling, D., Clancey, W. and Rennels, G., “Strategic Explanations for a Diagnostic Consultation System”, Intl J. of Man-Machine Studies, 20:3–20, January, 1984.Google Scholar
  18. [HIRS85]
    Hirschberg, J., “Scalar Implicature”, PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, December, 1985.Google Scholar
  19. [HHW84]
    Hollan, J., Hutchines, E. and Weitzman, L., “STEAMER: An Interactive Inspectable Simulation-based Training System”, AI Magazine, 5 (2): 15–28, Summer, 1984.Google Scholar
  20. [HR79]
    Hobbs, J. and Robinson, J., “Why Ask?”, Discourse Processes, 2, 1979.Google Scholar
  21. [JOSH82]
    Joshi, A.K., “Mutual Beliefs in Question Answering Systems”, in N. Smith (editor), Mutual Belief Academic Press, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
  22. [JWW84a]
    Joshi, A., Webber, B. and Weischedel, R., “Preventing False Inferences”, Proceedings ofCOLlNG-84, Stanford CA, July, 1984.Google Scholar
  23. [JWW84b]
    Joshi, A., Webber, B. and Weischedel, R., “Living Up to Expectations: Computing Expert Responses”, Proceedings of AAAI-84, Austin TX, August, 1984.Google Scholar
  24. [JWW84c]
    Joshi, A., Webber, B. and Weischedel, R., “Default Reasoning in Interaction”, Proceedings of 1984 Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, AAAI, Menlo Park CA, October, 1984.Google Scholar
  25. [KAPL82]
    Kaplan, J., “Cooperative Responses from a Portable Natural Language Database Query System”, M. Brady (editor), Computational Models of Discourse, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1982.Google Scholar
  26. [KT81]
    Kellogg, C. and Travis, L., “Reasoning with Data in a Deductively Augmented Data Management System”, H. Gallaire (editor), Advances in Data Bases, pages 261–295. Plenum Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  27. [LAL82]
    Lang, K., Auld, R. and Lang, T., “The Goals and Methods of Computer Users”, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 17: 375–399, 1982.Google Scholar
  28. [LEHN81]
    Lehnert, W., “A Computational Theory of Human Question Answering”, A. Joshi, B. Webber and I. Sag (editors), Elements of Discourse Understanding, chapter 6, pages 145–176. Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  29. [LEVE84a]
    Levesque, H., “Foundations of a Functional Approach to Representation”, Artificial Intelligence, 23 (2): 155–212, July, 1984.MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [LEVI83]
    Levinson, S., Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge England, 1983.Google Scholar
  31. [MAYS80]
    Mays, E., “Failures in natural language systems: application to data base query systems”, flProc. First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Stanford CA, August, 1980.Google Scholar
  32. [MAYS83]
    Mays, E., “A Modal Temporal Logic for Reasoning about Change”, Proc. 1983 Assoc. for Computational Linguistics Conference, Cambridge MA, June, 1983.Google Scholar
  33. [MAYS85]
    Mays, E., “A Temporal Logic for Reasoning about Changing Data Bases in the Context of Natural Language Question-Answering”, In L. Kerschberg (editor), Expert Database Systems, New York: Benjamin Cummings, 1985.Google Scholar
  34. [MCC083]
    McCoy, K., “Correcting Misconceptions: What to Say”, CHI’83 Conference Human Factors in Computing Systems, Cambridge MA, December, 1983.Google Scholar
  35. [MCC085]
    McCoy, K., “Correcting Object-related Misconceptions”, Technical Report MS-CIS-85-57, University of Pennsylvania, Dept. of Computer and Information Science, 1985. Ph.D. Thesis.Google Scholar
  36. [MCKE85]
    McKeown, K., Text Generation: Using Discourse Strategies and Focus Constraints to Generate Natural Language Text, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1985.Google Scholar
  37. [MWM85]
    McKeown, K., Wish, M. and Matthews, K., “Tailoring Explanations for the User”, Proceedings of the 1985 Conference, Int’l Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles CA, August, 1985.Google Scholar
  38. [MOOR801]
    Moore, R., “Reasoning about Knowledge and Action”, Technical Report 191, SRI International, 1980.Google Scholar
  39. [MOOR84]
    Moore, R.C., “A Formal Theory of Knowledge and Action”, in R.C. Moore and J. Hobbs (editor), Formal Theories of the Commonsense World, Ablex Publishing, Norwood NJ, 1984.Google Scholar
  40. [MR84]
    Mercer, R. and Rosenberg, R., “Generating Corrective Answers by Computing Presuppositions of Answers, not of Questions”, Proceedings of the 1984 Conference, pp. 16–19. Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, May, 1984.Google Scholar
  41. [POLL85]
    Pollack, M., “Information Sought and Information Provided”, Proceedings of CHI’85, pages 155–160. Assoc. for Computing Machinery (ACM), San Francisco CA, April, 1985.Google Scholar
  42. [REIT78a]
    Reiter, R., Deductive Q-A on Relational Databases, In [GM781].Google Scholar
  43. [REIT78b]
    Reiter, R., On Closed World Databases, In [GM781].Google Scholar
  44. [RVA84]
    Rissland, E., Valcarce, E. and Ashley, K., “Explaining and Arguing with Examples”, Proceedings of the Natl. Conf. on Art. Intelligence, pages 288–294. AAAI-84, University of Texas at Austin, August, 1984.Google Scholar
  45. [SADO77]
    Sadock, J., “Modus Brevis: The Truncated Argument”, Proceedings of the 1977 Meeting, pages 545–554. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago IL, 1977.Google Scholar
  46. [SCHA75]
    Schank, R., Conceptual Information Processing, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975.MATHGoogle Scholar
  47. [SERG83]
    Sergot, M., “A Query-the-User Facility for Logic Programming”, P. Degano and E. Sandewall (editor), Integrated Interactive Computing Systems, pages 27–41. North-Holland, 1983.Google Scholar
  48. [SWAR83]
    Swartout, W., “XPLAIN: A System for Creating and Explaining Expert Consulting Programs”, Artificial Intelligence, 21: 285–325, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [TRIL84]
    Trillin, C., Killings, Ticknor and Fields, New York City, 1984.Google Scholar
  50. [WALK82]
    Walker, A., “Automatic Generation of Explanations of Results from Knowledge Bases”, Technical Report RJ3481, IBM San Jose Research Laboratory, May, 1982.Google Scholar
  51. [WEIN80]
    Weiner, J., “BLAH, A System which explains its Reasoning”, Artificial Intelligence, 15: 19–48, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [WIN072]
    Winograd, T., Understanding Natural Language, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
  53. [WMJB83]
    Wahlster, W., Marburger, H., Jameson, A. and Busemann, S., “Over-Answering Yes-No Questions: Extended responses in a NL interface to a vision system”, Proceedings of the 8th IJCA1, pages 643–646. IJCAI, Karlsruhe, West Germany, August, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bonnie Lynn Webber
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Information ScienceUniversity of PennsylvaniaUSA

Personalised recommendations