Skip to main content

Differences in Social Exchange Between Intimate and Other Relationships: Gradually Evolving or Quickly Apparent?

  • Chapter
Friendship and Social Interaction

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Social Psychology ((SSSOC))

Abstract

Interpersonal attraction has long been of considerable interest to social psychologists. Much of the work in this area, however, has been of the “one-shot” variety, focusing on factors influencing initial attraction between strangers. Social psychologists, for instance, have studied how proximity, similarity, physical attractiveness, and equity influence strangers’ initial attraction toward one another. Recently, some investigators have argued that close relationships such as friendships or romantic relationships are so different from casual ones that little of what has been gleaned from the study of initial attraction will be of use in understanding them (e.g., Levinger & Snoek, 1972; Murstein, Cerreto, & MacDonald; Rubin, 1973). Such criticisms, whether or not they turn out to be correct, highlight the importance of social psychologists addressing themselves more fully to understanding the dynamics of close friendships and how people become close. If whatever it is that distinguishes close from not close relationships develops very gradually, perhaps it is true that studying people who have just met will be of little importance to understanding the formation and dynamics of relationships such as friendships and romantic relationships. If, however, people make some fairly clear decisions about the nature of relationships early on, then one can argue that studying initial impressions and behavior is important to the study of close relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abelson, R.A. (1976). Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. In J. Carrol & J. Payne (Eds.), Cognition and social behavior (pp. 33–46 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I., &, Haythorn, W.W. (1965). Interpersonal exchange in isolation. Sociometry, 23, 411–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I., & Taylor, D.A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I., Vinsel, A., & Brown, B.B. (1981). Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 107–160 ). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J.H. (1983). Attraction in relationships: As it begins so it goes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J.H. (1984). The development of friendship between roommates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J.H., & Archer, R.L. (1980). Disclosure or concern: A second look at liking for the norm-breaker. Journal of Personality, 48, 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J.H., & Archer, R.L. (1982). Responses to self-disclosure and interaction goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J.H., & Archer, RL. (1983). The disclosure-liking relationship: Effects of self-perception, order of disclosure, and topical similarity. Human Communication Research, 10, 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J.H., Blaylock, T., Camarillo, J., & Steck, L. ( 1985, March). Taking another’s outcomes into consideration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Altanta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J., & Miller, L. (1985). The timing of responsive acts.. Unpublished manuscript, University of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berscheid, E., Dion, K.K., Walster, E., & Walster, G.W. (1971). A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, R.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, C.D. (1961). Mate selection as the development of a relationship. Marriage and Family Living 23, 234–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braiker, H.B., & Kelley, H.H. (1979). Conflict in the development of Close relationships. In R.L. Burgess & T.L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135–168 ). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M.S. (1981). Noncomparability of benefits given and received: A cue to the existence of friendship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 375–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M.S. (1983). Some implications of close social bonds for help seeking. In B.M. DePaulo, A. Nadler, & J.D. Fisher (Eds.), New directions in helping: Vol. 2. Help seeking (pp. 205–229 ). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M.S. (1984). Record keeping in two types of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 549–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M.S. (in press). Evidence for the effectiveness of manipulations of desire for communal versus exchange relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M.S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M.S., Ouellette, R, & Milberg, S. ( 1984, July). Recipient mood, relationship type and helping. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Interpersonal Relationships, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M.S., & Vanderlipp, B. (in press). Perceptions of exploitation in communal and exchange relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabbs, J.H. Uwanna, R, Evans, M., & Bakeman, R. (1982). Getting acquainted: Patterns of speech and gaze. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 63 (MS 2090).

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J.M., & Berscheid, E. (1967). Increased liking as a result of anticipation of personal contact. Human Relations. 20, 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. (1982). Determinants of responsiveness in dyadic interactions. In W. Ickes & E.G. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles and social behavior (pp. 85–140 ). New York: Springer-Verlag ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D., & Perkowitz, W.T. (1979). Consequences of responsiveness in dyadic interactions: Effects of probability of response and proportion of content-related responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 534–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K.E., & Todd, M.J. (1982). Friendship and love relationships In K.E. Davis & T.O. Mitchell (Eds.), Advances in Psychology, (Vol. 2, pp. 79–122 ). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K.E., & Todd, M.J. (in press). Assesing friendships: Prototypes, Paradigm cases, and relationship assesment. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Sage Series in Personal Relationships (Vol. 1). London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B.M., Leiphart, V., & Dull, W.R. (in press). Helping seeking and social interaction: Person, situation and process considerations. In E. Staub, D. Bar-Tal, J. Reykowski, & J. Karylowski (Eds.), The Development and maintenance of pro-social behavior. Newe York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derlega, V.J., Wilson, M., & Chaikin, A.L. (1976). Friendship and disclosure reciprocity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 578–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J.D., Nadler, A., & Whitcher-Alagna, S. (1982). Recipient reaction to aid: A conceptual review. Psychological Bulletin, 9, 27–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foa, U.G., & Foa, E.B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grifitt, W. (1970). Environmental effects on interpersonal affective behavior: Ambient effective temperature and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 240–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1983). Equity theory and recipient reactions to aid. In J.D. Fisher, A. Nadler, & M. DePaulo (Eds.), New directions in helping: Vol 1. Recipient reactions (pp. 113–141 ). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, R.B. (1984). The development and maintenance of friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 75–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays, R.B. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 909–924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keiser, G.J., & Altman, I. (1976). Relationship of nonverbal behavior to the social penetration process. Human Communication Research, 2, 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H.H. (1979). Close relationships: Their structures and processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H.H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J.H., Huston, T.L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D.R. (1983). Close relationships. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerckhoff, AC., & Davis, K.E. (1962). Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection. American Sociological Review, 27, 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, E. (1977). Meaning and void: Inner experience and the incentives in people’s lives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M.J., Miller, D.T., & Holmes, J.G. (1976). Deserving and the emergence of forms of justice. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 134–163 ). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G. (1979). A social exchange view on the dissolution of pair relationships. In R.L. Burgess & T.L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 169–196 ). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G., (1983). Development and change, In H.H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J.H. Harvey, R.L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L.A. Peplau, & D.R. Peterson, Close relationships (pp. 315–359 ). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G., Senn, D.J., & Jorgensen, B.W. (1970). Progress toward permanence in courtship: A test of the Kerkoff-David hypothesis. Sociometry, 33, 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G., & Snoek, J.D. (1972). Attraction in relationship: A new look at interpersonal attraction. New York: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L.C., & Berg, J.H. (1984). Selectivity and urgency in interpersonal exchange. In V.J. Derlega (Ed.), Communication, intimacy, and close relationships (pp. 161–205 ). Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L.C., Berg, J.H., & Archer, R.L. (1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1234–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L.C., Berg, J.H., & Rugs, D. ( 1984, September). Selectivity in exchange: When you give me what I need. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J., & Clark, M.S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 121–144 ). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T.L. (1978). Intimacy and reciprocity of exchange: A comparison of spouses and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B.I. (1970). Stimulus-value-role: A theory of marital choice. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 32, 465–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B.I. (1972). Physical attractiveness and marital choice. Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murstein, B.I., Cerreto, M., & MacDonald, M.G. (1977). A theory and investigation of the effect of exchange orientation on marriage and friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 543–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, T.M. (1961). The acquaintanceship process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Preno, B.E., & Stiles, W.B. (1983). Familiarity in verbal interactions of married couples versus strangers. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, J. A, Dabbs, J.M., & Hopper, C.H. (1984). The “opener”: Skilled user of facial expression and speech pattern. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 61–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z. (1973). Liking and loving: An invitation to social psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Z., & Levinger, G. (1974). Theory and data badly mated: A critique of Murstein’s SVR theory and Lewis’s PDF model of mate selection. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 226–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C.E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development John H. Berg and Margaret S. Clark of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, M.W. (1974). Alphabet and attraction: An unobtrusive measure of the effect of propinquity in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 654–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sholar, W., & Clark, M.S. (1982). Deciding in communal relationships: By consensus or should majority rule? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, N., & Swann, W.B. (1978). Hypothesis testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., Tanke, E.D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 656–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W.B., & Read, S.H. (1981). Self-verification processes: How we sustain our self-perceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 351–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D.A. (1968). Some aspects of the development of interpersonal relationships: Social penetration processes. Journal of Social Psychology, 75, 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D.A, & Altman, I. (1975). Self-disclosure as a function of reward-cost outcomes. Sociometry, 38, 18–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D.A., Altman, I., & Sorrentino, R. (1969). Interpersonal exchange as a function of rewards and costs and situational factors: Expectancy confirmation-disconfirmation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 324–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolstedt, B.E., & Stokes, J.P. (1984). Self-disclosure, intimacy and the depenetration process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 84–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornblom, K.Y., & Fredholm, E.M. (1984). Attribution of friendship: The influence of the nature and comparability of resources given and received. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., Walster, G.W., & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D.M., & Giuliano, T. (1982). The forms of social awareness. In W. J. Ickes & E.S. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles, and social behavior (pp. 165–198 ). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Won-Doornick, M. (1979). On getting to know you: The association between stage of relationship and reciprocity of self-disclosure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadny, J., & Gerard, H.B. (1974). Attributed intentions of informational selectivity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 34–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berg, J.H., Clark, M.S. (1986). Differences in Social Exchange Between Intimate and Other Relationships: Gradually Evolving or Quickly Apparent?. In: Derlega, V.J., Winstead, B.A. (eds) Friendship and Social Interaction. Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4880-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4880-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-9344-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4880-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics