Advertisement

Low Vision pp 308-322 | Cite as

Effect of Magnification and Field of View on Reading Speed Using a CCTV

  • J. E. Lovie-Kitchin
  • George C. Woo

Abstract

Persons with untreatable visual disorders whose vision cannot be corrected by routine refraction require either optical or electronic aids to magnify the images of objects of interest. Spectacles, simple magnifiers, telescopes and Closed Circuit Television Systems (CCTVs) can all be used as low vision aids to assist persons with reading. CCTVs generally come in the form of a television camera connected to a video display monitor. Optical low vision reading aids are available in different powers, but as the eye-to-lens distance increases, the angular field of view and the magnification of simple plus lenses decreases [1]. Clinicians working in low vision have often observed that reading speed of low vision patients is reduced when the high magnification aids are used away from the spectacle plane, due to the limited number of words seen at one time. The usual clinical rule of thumb for prescribing optical aids is, therefore, to prescribe the lowest power which will enable the patient to read the required print size. It is hypothesized that this provides the widest possible field of view through the aid, when the magnifying system is placed as close as possible to the eye.

Keywords

Field Size Normal Vision Reading Speed Distance Visual Acuity Character Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A.W. Johnston: Technical note: The relationship between magnification and field of view for simple magnifiers. Aust. J. Optom. 65, 74 (1982)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E.B. Mehr, A.B. Frost, L.E. Apple: Experience with closed circuit television in the blind rehabilitation program of the Veteran’s Administration. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 50, 458 (1973)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G.L. Goodrich, E.B. Mehr, R.D. Quillman, H.K. Shaw, J.K. Wiley: Training and practice effects in performance with low-vision aids: A preliminary study. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 54, 312 (1977)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G.L. Goodrich, E.B. Mehr, N.C. Darling: Parameters in the use of CCTVs and optical aids. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 57, 881 (1980)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Zabel, H. Bouma, H.E.M. Melotte: Use of the TV magnifier in the Netherlands: A survey. J. Visual Impairment & Blind. 76, 25 (1982)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.L. Duchnicky, P.A. Kolers: Readability of text scrolled on visual display terminals as a function of window size. Hum. Factors 25, 683 (1983)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.S. Kruk, P. Muter: Reading of continuous text on video screens. Hum. Factors. 26, 339 (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G.E. Legge, D.G. Pelli, G.S. Rubin, M.M. Schleske: Psychophysics of reading I. Normal vision. Vision Res. 25, 239 (1985)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G.E. Legge, G.S. Rubin, D.G. Pelli, M.M. Schleske: Psychophysics of reading n. Low vision; Vision Res. 25, 253 (1985)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.H. Munro: The Short Stories of Saki (Modern Library, New York 1951)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Brown:. Reading performance in low vision patients: Relation to contrast and contrast sensitivity. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 58, 218 (1981)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Muter, S.A. Latremouille, W.C. Treurniet: Extended reading of continuous text on television screens. Hum. Factors 24, 501 (1982)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    I.L. Bailey, J.E. Lovie: New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 53, 740 (1976)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    I.L. Bailey, J.E. Lovie: The design and use of a new near-vision chart. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 57, 378 (1980)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S.J. Lagrow: Effects of training on CCTV reading rates of visually impaired students. J. Visual Impairment & Blind. 75, 368 (1981)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G.L. Goodrich, L.E. Apple, A. Frost, A. Wood, R. Ward, N. Darling: A preliminary report on experienced closed-circuit television users. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 53, 7 (1976)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E.C. Poulton: Peripheral vision, refractoriness and eye movements in fast oral reading. Br. J. Psychol. 53, 409 (1962)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    K. Rayner, A.D. Well, A. Pollatsek: Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Percept. Psychophys. 27, 537 (1980)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Rayner, A.D. Well, A. Pollatsek, J.H. Bertera: The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Percept. Psychophys. 31, 537 (1982)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.E. Lovie-Kitchin, K.J. Bowman: Senile Macular Degeneration: Management and Rehabilitation (But- terworths, Boston 1985)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. E. Lovie-Kitchin
  • George C. Woo

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations