Advertisement

Mid-Trimester Abortion: A Global View

  • Sara L. Tietze
  • Richard Lincoln

Abstract

Mid-trimester abortion is responsible for a disproportionate share of adverse experiences associated with the termination of pregnancy. In the United States, abortions performed at 13 weeks’ gestation or later accounted for 11% of Online legal abortions during 1972–1977, for an estimated two-thirds of Online major complications, and for 57% of Online known fatalities. It is important, therefore, to review the levels and trends of mid-trimester abortions throughout the world, the demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of the women obtaining them, and the methods used for their performance.

Keywords

National Health Service Medical Induction Abortion Service Legal Abortion Trimester Abortion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Canada: Statistics Canada. Therapeutic Abortions 1977. Also earlier volumes.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cates W Jr, Tietze C. Standardized mortality rates associated with legal abortion: United States, 1972–1975.Google Scholar
  3. Cates W Jr, Tietze C Family Planning Perspectives 1978;10:109–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    Czechoslovakia: Institute for Health Statistics. Zdravotnicka Statistika CSSR. Potraty 1977. Also earlier volumes.Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Forrest JD, et al. Abortion in the United States, 1976–1977Google Scholar
  6. Forrest JD. Family Planning Perspectives 1978;10:271–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 5.
    Hong SB, Tietze C: Survey of abortion providers in Seoul, Korea. Studies in Family Planning 1979;10:161–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 6.
    Hungary: Central Statistical Office. A Vetelesek Adatai 1974–1975. Also earlier volumes.Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    Hungary: Central Statistical Office. Terhessegmegszakitasok es Spontan Vetelesek Adatai 1976–1977.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    India: National Institute of Family Planning. Director’s Report 1975–76.Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    Japan: Ministry of Health and Welfare. Statistics of Eugenic Protection: Showa 52. Also earlier volumes.Google Scholar
  12. 10.
    Muramatsu M. An analysis of factors in fertility control in Japan—an updated and revised version. Bull Inst Public Health 1973;22:228–236.Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    Pakter J, et al. Legal abortion: a half decade of experience. Family Planning Perspectives 1975;7:248–255 (supplemented by unpublished data for 1975–1977).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 12.
    Rao NB, Kanbagi R. Legal abortion in an Indian State. Studies in Family Planning 1977; 8:311–315 (supplemented by unpublished data).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 13.
    Sweden: National Board of Health and Welfare: Aborter 1977.Statistiska meddelanden, HS 1979:5. Also earlier volumes and unpublished data for 1968–1972.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    Tietze C, Lewit S. Joint program for the study of abortion (JPSA): early medical complications of legal abortion. Studies in Family Planning 1972;3:97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 15.
    Tietze C. Induced Abortion 1979. New York: The Population Council.Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    United Kingdom: Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. The Registrar General’s Statistical Review of England and Wales. Supplement on Abortion 1973. Also earlier volumes.Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    United Kingdom: Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. Abortion Statistics: Legal abortions carried out under the 1967 Abortion Act in England and Wales, 1976. Also volumes for 1974 and 1975.Google Scholar
  20. United Kingdom: Scottish Home and Health Department. Abortion statistics. Health Bulletin 1977; 35:282–295. Also earlier issues.Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    Centers for Disease Control. Abortion Surveillance 1977. Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control, 1978 (also earlier volumes).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sarah L. Tietze 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara L. Tietze
    • 1
  • Richard Lincoln
    • 2
  1. 1.New YorkUSA
  2. 2.The Alan Guttmacher InstituteNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations