Advertisement

Abstract

The theory of quasigeostrophic motion developed in previous chapters required several conditions for its validity. Foremost, of course, was the condition that the time scale of the motion is large compared to f - 1. This is not always sufficient, as the discussion of the Kelvin wave in Section 3.9 indicated. When the wavelength of the Kelvin wave is long compared to the deformation radius, the frequency is small compared to f. Yet the equation of motion in the direction along the boundary does not reduce to geostrophic balance. A longshore* pressure gradient exists and is balanced by the acceleration of the longshore velocity, and the onshore flow is identically zero. This result is not inconsistent with the quasigeostrophic theory developed previously, for in the quasigeostrophic dynamics so far considered, we have assumed that there existed only a single horizontal scale for the motion, i.e., that the scaling of the motion is isotropic horizontally. The low-frequency Kelvin wave is not horizontally isotropic, since its offshore scale is the deformation radius, which for low frequencies is small compared with the wavelength. In this chapter we consider some of the refinements to quasigeostrophic theory that are required when the motion is strongly anisotropic.

Keywords

Rossby Wave Equatorial Wave Ekman Layer Baroclinic Mode Geostrophic Balance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

Section 8.1

  1. Hoskins, B. J. 1975. The geostrophic momentum approximation and the semi- geostrophic approximation. J. Atmos. Sci. 32, 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Section 8.2

  1. Cutchin, D. L. and Smith, R. L. 1973. Continental shelf waves: low frequency variations in sea-level and currents over the Oregon continental shelf. J. Phys. Oceanog. 3, 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Leblond, P. H. and Mysak, L. A. 1977. Trapped coastal waves and their role in shelf dynamics. In The Sea. Wiley-Interscience. Vol. 6, Chapter 10, 459–495.Google Scholar
  3. Mysak, L. A. 1967. On the theory of continental shelf waves. J. Mar. Res. 25, 205–227.Google Scholar
  4. Robinson, A. R. 1964. Continental shelf waves and the response of sea level to weather systems. J. Geophys. Res. 69, 367–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Section 8.3

  1. Allen, J. S. 1973. Upwelling and coastal jets in a continuously stratified ocean. J. Phys. Oceanog. 3, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barcilon, V. and Pedlosky, J. 1966. Linear theory of rotating stratified fluid motions. J. Fluid Mech. 29, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barcilon, V. and Pedlosky, J. 1966. A unified linear theory of homogeneous and stratified rotating fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 9, 609–621.Google Scholar
  4. Pedlosky, J. 1974. On coastal jets and upwelling in bounded basins. J. Phys. Oceanog. 4, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Section 8.4

  1. Bergeron, T. 1928. Über die dreidimensional verknüpfend Wetteranalyse I. Geofys. Publikasjoner 5, 1–11.Google Scholar
  2. Hoskins, B. J. 1971. Atmospheric frontogenesis models: some solutions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 97, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hoskins, B. J. and Bretherton, F. P. 1972. Atmospheric frontogenesis models: Mathematical formulation and solution. J. Atmos. Sci. 29, 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Petterssen, S. 1956. Weather Analysis and Forecasting. Vol. 1. Motion and Motion Systems McGraw Hill, 422 pp. Chapter 11.Google Scholar
  5. Sommerfeld, A. 1949. Partial Differential Equations in Physics Academic Press, 329 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Stone, P. H. 1966. Frontogenesis by horizontal wind deformation fields. J. Atmos. Sci. 23, 455–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Voorhis, A. D. 1969. The horizontal extent and persistence of thermal fronts in the Sargasso Sea. Deep-Sea Res. 16 (supplement), 331–337.Google Scholar
  8. Williams, R. T. 1967. Atmospheric frontogenesis: a numerical experiment. J. Atmos. Sci. 24, 627–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Section 8.5

  1. Cane, M. A. and Sarachik, E. S. 1976. Forced baroclinic ocean motions: I. The linear equatorial unbounded case. J. Mar. Res. 34, 629–665.Google Scholar
  2. Cane, M. A. and Sarachik, E. S. 1977. Forced baroclinic ocean motions: II. The linear equatorial bounded case. J. Mar. Res. 35, 395–432.Google Scholar
  3. Holton, J. R. 1975. The Dynamic Meteorology of the Stratosphere and Mesosphere. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 216 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Luyten, J. R. and Swallow, J. C. 1976. Equatorial undercurrents. Deep-Sea Res. 23, 1005–1007.Google Scholar
  5. Moore, D. W. 1968. Planetary gravity waves in an equatorial ocean. Ph.D. Thesis. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  6. Moore, D. W. and Philander, S. G. H. 1977. Modeling of the tropical oceanic circulation. In The Sea. Eds., E. D. Goldberg et al. Wiley-Interscience. Vol. 6, Chapter 8.Google Scholar
  7. Wallace, J. M. 1971. General circulation of the tropical lower stratosphere. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 11, 191–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wunsch, C. 1977. Response of an equatorial ocean to a periodic monsoon. J. Phys. Oceanog. 7, 497–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Pedlosky
    • 1
  1. 1.Woods Hole Oceanographic InstitutionWoods HoleUSA

Personalised recommendations