Geophysical Fluid Dynamics pp 179-253 | Cite as

# Friction and Viscous Flow

- 1 Citations
- 879 Downloads

## Abstract

The observed persistence over several days of large-scale waves in the atmosphere and the oceans reinforces the impression that frictional forces are weak, almost everywhere, when compared with the Coriolis acceleration and the pressure gradient. Friction rarely upsets the geostrophic balance to lowest order. Indeed, for many flows it is probably also true that the dissipative time scale is long compared to the advective time scale, i.e., that the frictional forces are weak in comparison with the nonlinear relative acceleration. Nevertheless friction, and the dissipation of mechanical energy it implies, cannot be ignored. The reasons are simple yet fundamental. For the time-averaged flow, i.e., for the general circulation of both the atmosphere and the oceans, the fluid motions respond to a variety of essentially steady external forcing. The atmosphere, for example, is set in motion by the persistent but spatially nonuniform solar heating. This input of energy produces a mechanical response, i.e., kinetic energy of the large-scale motion, and eventually this must be dissipated if a steady state—or at least a statistically stable average state of motion—is to be maintained. This requires frictional dissipation. In addition, the driving force itself may be frictional, as in the case of the wind-driven oceanic circulation. There the wind stress on the ocean surface produces a major component of the oceanic circulation. Finally, even though friction may be weak compared with other forces, its dissipative nature, qualitatively distinct from the conservative nature of the inertial forces, require its consideration if questions of the decay of free motions are to be studied.

## Keywords

Vertical Velocity Viscous Flow Potential Vorticity Ekman Layer Friction Layer## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## Bibliography

## Section 4.2

- Sutton, O. G. 1949.
*Atmospheric Turbulence*Methuen and Co., 107 pp.Google Scholar - Taylor, G. 1. 1915. Eddy motion in the atmosphere.
*Philosophical Trans. Royal Soc. A***CCXV**, 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Section 4.3

- Ekman, V. W. 1905. On the influence of the earth’s rotation on ocean currents.
*Arkiv. Matem., Astr. Fysik*, Stockholm**2**(11).Google Scholar

## Section 4.4

- Cole, J. D. 1968.
*Perturbation Methods In Applied Mathematics*Blaisdell, 260 pp.Google Scholar - Van Dyke, M. 1964.
*Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics*Academic Press, 229 pp.Google Scholar

## Section 4.5

- Cole, J. D. 1968.
*Perturbation Methods In Applied Mathematics*Blaisdell, 260 pp.Google Scholar

## Section 4.7

- Greenspan, H. P. and Howard, L. N. 1963. On a time dependent motion of a rotating fluid.
*J. Fluid Mech*.**22**, 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Section 4.11

- Charney, J. G. and Eliassen, A. 1949. A numerical method for predicting the perturbations of the middle-latitude westerlies.
*Tellus***1**, 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Section 4.13

- Stewartson, K. 1957. On almost rigid rotations.
*J. Fluid Mech*. 3, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

## Section 4.14

- Basdevant, C., Legras, B., and Sadourny, R. 1981. A study of barotropic model flows: Intermittency, waves, and predictability.
*J. Atmos. Sci*. 38, 2305–2326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Batchelor, G. K. 1969. Computation of the energy spectrum in homogeneous two-dimensional turbulence.
*The Physics of Fluids*, Supplement II: pp. 233–239.Google Scholar - Kraichnan, R. H. 1967. Inertial ranges in two-dimensional turbulence.
*The Physics of Fluids*, Supplement II: pp. 233–239.Google Scholar - Kraichnan, R. H. 1971. Inertial-range transfer in two-and three-dimensional turbulence.
*J. Fluid Mech***47**, 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lilly, D. K. 1969. Number simulation of two-dimensional turbulence.
*The Physics of Fluids*, Supplement II: pp. 240–249.Google Scholar