Advertisement

Phytoplankton and Their Relationship to Nutrients

  • Richard C. Lathrop
  • Stephen R. Carpenter
Part of the Springer Series on Environmental Management book series (SSEM)

Abstract

The phytoplankton that commonly occur in Lake Mendota are the central focus of the food web research detailed in this volume (Figure 7.1). The role of nutrients, particularly phosphorus, in regulating algal biomass and stimulating blooms is well established (Vollenweider 1968; Schindler 1977, 1988). Herbivory by zooplankton has also been long recognized as an important influence on phytoplankton abundance and species composition (Hrbacek 1962; Brooks and Dodson 1965; Shapiro et al. 1975; Shapiro and Wright 1984; Carpenter and Kitchell 1988). While phosphorus reductions cause declines in blue-green algal densities (Schindler 1988), the effects of herbivory are more variable and complicated (Sterner 1989; Carpenter, Ch. 23). For example, increased herbivory has been both stimulated (Lynch 1980; Anderson and Cronberg 1984) and suppressed (Shapiro and Wright 1984; Carpenter et al. 1987; Vanni et al. 1990) blue-green algae.

Keywords

Total Phosphorus Algal Biomass Microcystis Aeruginosa Dissolve Reactive Phosphorus Algal Biovolume 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson G, Cronberg G (1984) Aphanizomenon flos-aquae and large Daphnia—an interesting plankton association in hypertrophic water. In Bosheim S, Nicholls M (eds) Nordisk limnologsymposium, Interactions between trophic levels in freshwaters, Norsk Limnologforening, OsloGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardach JE (1951) Changes in the yellow perch population of Lake Mendota, 1916-1948. Ecology 32:719–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birge EA (1898) Plankton studies on Lake Mendota: II. The Crustacea of the plankton from July, 1894, to December, 1896. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 11:274–448Google Scholar
  4. Birge EA, Juday C (1922) The inland lakes of Wisconsin: The plankton I. Its quantity and chemical composition. Wis. Geol. Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. No. 64, Sci. Ser. No. 13Google Scholar
  5. Box GEP, Jenkins GJ (1976) Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  6. Box GEP, Tiao GC (1975) Intervention analysis with applications to economic and environmental problems. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 70:70–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brock TD (1985) A eutrophic lake: Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brockwell PJ, Davis RA (1987) Time series: Theory and methods. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks JL, Dodson SI (1965) Predation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science 150:28–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter SR (1988) Transmission of variance through lake food webs. In Carpenter SR (ed) Complex interactions in lake communities, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 119–135Google Scholar
  11. Carpenter SR, Frost TM, Kitchell JF, Kratz TK, Schindler DW, Shearer J, Sprules WG, Vanni MJ, Zimmerman AP (1991) Patterns of primary production and herbivory in 25 North American lake ecosystems. In Cole J, Findlay S, Lovett G (eds) Comparative analyses of ecosystems: Patterns, mechanisms, and theories. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 67–96Google Scholar
  12. Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1988) Consumer control of lake productivity. BioScience 38:764–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF, Hodgson JR, Cochran PA, Elser JJ, Elser MM, Lodge DM, Kretchmer D, He X, von Ende C (1987) Regulation of lake primary productivity by food-web structure. Ecology 68:1863–1876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Edmondson WT (1980) Secchi disk and chlorophyll. Limnol. Oceanogr. 25:378–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris GP (1986) Phytoplankton ecology: Structure, function and fluctuation. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Horne AJ (1978) Nitrogen fixation in eutrophic lakes. In Mitchell R (ed) Water pollution microbiology, Vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, 6New York, pp 1–30Google Scholar
  17. Hrbacek J (1962) Species composition and the amount of zooplankton in relation to the fish stock. Rozpr. Cesk. Akad. Ved Rada Mat. Prir. Ved 72:1–116Google Scholar
  18. Jassby AD, Powell TM (1990) Detecting change in ecological time series. Ecology 71:2044–2052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jassby AD, Powell TM, Goldman CR (1990) Interannual fluctuations in primary production: Direct physical effects and the trophic cascade at Castle Lake, California. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35: 1021–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kopp JF, McKee GD (1979) Methods for chemical analyses of water and wastes, 1978. 3rd edn. EPA-600/4-79-020. Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, OhioGoogle Scholar
  21. Lathrop RC (1990) Response of Lake Mendota (Wisconsin, U.S.A.) to decreased phosphorus loadings and their effect on downstream lakes. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 24:457–463Google Scholar
  22. Likens GE (ed) (1985) An ecosystem approach to aquatic ecology: Mirror Lake and its environment. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Likens GE (ed) (1989) Long-term studies in ecology. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Lillie RA, Mason JW (1983) Limnological characteristics of Wisconsin lakes. Wis. Dep. Nat. Resour. Tech. Bull. No. 138Google Scholar
  25. Lund JWG (1979) Changes in phytoplankton of an English lake, 1945-1947. Hydrobiol. J. 14:6–21Google Scholar
  26. Lynch M (1980) Aphanizomenon blooms: Alternate control and cultivation by Daphnia pulex. In Kerfoot WC (ed) Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities, University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire, pp 299–304Google Scholar
  27. McNaught DC (1965) A study of some ecological relationships and the role of vision in the diel migrations of Daphnia. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  28. Robertson DM (1989) The use of lake water temperature and ice cover as climatic indicators. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  29. Sager PE (1967) Species diversity and community structure in lacustrine phytoplankton. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  30. SAS Institute, Inc. (1988) SAS/ETS User’s Guide, Version 6. 1st edn. Cary, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  31. Schindler DW (1977) Evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes. Science 195:260–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schindler DW (1988) Experimental studies of chemical stressors on whole-lake ecosystems. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limn. 23:11–41Google Scholar
  33. Shapiro J, Lamarra V, Lynch M (1975) Biomanipulation: An ecosystem approach to lake restoration. In Brezonik PL, Fox JL (eds) Proceedings of a symposium on water quality management through biological control, University of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  34. Shapiro J, Wright DI (1984) Lake restoration by biomanipulation: Round Lake, Minnesota the first two years. Freshwat. Biol. 14:371–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sommer U, Gliwicz ZM, Lampert W, Duncan A (1986) The PEG*-model of seasonal succession of planktonic events in fresh waters. Archiv. Hydrobiol. 106:433–471Google Scholar
  36. Sonzogni WC (1974) Effect of nutrient input reduction on the eutrophication of the Madison lakes. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  37. Stauffer RE, Lee GF (1973) The role of thermocline migration in regulating algal blooms. In Middlebrooks EJ (ed) Modelling the eutrophication process, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp 73–81Google Scholar
  38. Sterner RW (1989) The role of grazers in phytoplankton succession. In Sommer U (ed) Plankton ecology: Succession in plankton communities, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 107–170Google Scholar
  39. Sterner RW (1991) The ratio of nitrogen to phosphorus resupplied by zooplankton: Grazers and the algal competitive arena. Am. Nat. 136:209–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Torrey MLS (1972) Biological nitrogen fixation in Lake Mendota. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  41. Trelease W (1889) The “working” of the Madison lakes. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 7:121–129Google Scholar
  42. Vanni MJ, Luecke C, Kitchell JF, Rentmeester Y, Temte J, Magnuson JJ (1990) Cascading trophic interactions and phytoplankton abundance in a eutrophic lake: Effects of massive fish mortality. Nature 344:333–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vollenweider RA (1968) Scientific fundamentals of the eutrophication of lakes and flowing waters, with particular reference to nitrogen and phosphorus as factors in eutrophication. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Rep. No. DAS/CSI/68.27Google Scholar
  44. Wei WWS (1990) Time series analysis. Addison-Wesley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Wilkinson L (1988) SYSTAT: The system for statistics. Systat Inc., Evanston, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  46. Wisconsin Committee on Water Pollution (1949) Report on Lake Mendota studies concerning conditions contributing to occurrence of aquatic nuisances 1945-1947. Wis. Comm. Water Poll.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard C. Lathrop
  • Stephen R. Carpenter

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations