Historical Interpretation of Pigment Stratigraphy in Lake Mendota Sediments

  • James P. Hurley
  • David E. Armstrong
  • Andrea L. DuVall
Part of the Springer Series on Environmental Management book series (SSEM)


Algal pigments are important biomakers of lake productivity and trophic interactions. Our understanding of organic matter production, sedimentation, and decomposition, phytoplankton-zooplankton interactions, and historical changes in lakes has benefited from pigment-derived information. However, several pitfalls may be encountered in interpreting pigment data. Algal pigments must be distinguished from those produced by higher plants and photosynthetic bacteria. Influences of production on pigment types and concentrations in the water column must be resolved from effects of photodegradation and chemical or biological alteration. Biases in historical sedimentary records toward pigments preferentially preserved during diagnesis must be quantified. With these complications in view, algal pigments provide important insights into lake biogeo- chemistry and paleolimnology.


Water Column Sediment Trap Grazing Intensity Biogenic Silica Major Carotenoid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bidigare RR, Kennicutt MC, Brooks JM (1985) Rapid determination of chlorophylls and their degradation products by high performance liquid chromatography. Limnol. Oceanogr. 30:432–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bortleson GC (1970) The chemical investigation of recent lake sediments from Wisconsin lakes and their interpretation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  3. Brock TD (1985) A eutrophic lake: Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpenter SR, Elser MM, Elser JJ (1986) Chlorophyll production, degradation and sedimentation: Implications for paleolimnology. Limnol. Oceanogr. 31:112–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daley RJ (1983) Experimental characterization of lacustrine chlorophyll diagenesis. 2. Bacterial, viral and herbivore grazing effects. Arch. Hydrobiol. 72:409–439Google Scholar
  6. Daley RJ, Brown SR (1983) Experimental characterization of lacustrine chlorophyll diagenesis. 1. Physiological and environmental effects. Arch. Hydrobiol. 72:277–304Google Scholar
  7. DeMaster DJ (1979) The marine budgets of silica and 32Si. Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University, New Haven, ConnecticutGoogle Scholar
  8. DuVall AL (1990) Historical trends in diatom production in Lake Mendota: Evidence from the sedimentary record. Water Chemistry Program Report, University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  9. Fallon R, Brock TD (1980) Planktonic blue-green algae: Production, sedimentation and decomposition in Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. Limnol. Oceanogr. 25:72–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Furlong ET, Carpenter R (1988) Pigment remineralization in oxic coastal marine sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 52:87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodwin, TW (1965) Distribution of carotenoids. In Goodwin TW (ed) Chemistry and biochemistry of plant pigments, Academic Press, New York, pp 127–142Google Scholar
  12. Henrichs SM, Farrington JW (1987) Early diagenesis of amino acids and organic matter in two coastal marine sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 51:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holm-Hansen OO, Lorenzen CJ, Holmes RW, Strickland JDH (1965) Fluorometric determination of chlorophyll. J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer. 30:3–15Google Scholar
  14. Hurley JP (1988a) Diagenesis of algal pigments in lake sediments. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurley JP (1988b) Analysis of aquatic pigments by High Performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Anal. Purif. 3:12–16Google Scholar
  16. Hurley JP, Armstrong DE (1990) Fluxes and transformations of aquatic pigments in Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. Limnol. Oceanogr. 32:384–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hurley JP, Armstrong DE (1991) Pigment preservation in lake sediments: a comparison of sedimentary environments in Trout Lake, Wisconsin. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 48:472–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeffrey SW, Hallegraeff GM (1987) Chlorophyllase distribution in ten classes of phytoplankton: A problem for chlorophyll analysis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 35:293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keely BJ, Brereton RG (1986) Early chlorin diagenesis in a Recent aquatic sediment. In Leythaeuser W, Pullkotter J (eds) Advances in organic geochemistry 1985, pp 975–980, Pergamon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Krausse GL, Schelske CL, Davis CO (1983) Comparison of three wet alkaline methods of digestion of biogenic silica in water. Freshwat. Biol. 13:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leavitt PR, Carpenter SR (1990a) Aphotic pigment degradation in the hypolimnion: Implications for sedimentation studies and paleolimnology. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35:520–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leavitt PR, Carpenter SR (1990b) Regulation of pigment sedimentation by photo-oxidation and herbivore grazing. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47:1166–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leavitt PR, Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1989) Whole-lake experiments: The annual record of fossil pigments and zooplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 34:700–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lerman A (1979) Geochemical processes: Water and sediment environment. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Lorenzen CJ (1967) Determination of chlorophyll and phaeopigments: Spectrophotometric equations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12:343–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mantoura RFC, Llewellyn CA (1983) The rapid determination of algal chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments and their breakdown products in natural waters by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta 151:297–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murray RC (1956) Recent sediments of three Wisconsin lakes. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 67:883–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Repeta DJ (1989) Carotenoid diagenesis in recent marine sediments: II. Degradation of fucoxanthin to loliolide. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 53:699–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Repeta DJ, Gagosian RB (1984) Transformations and recycling of carotenoids and chlorins in the Peru upwelling region (15°S, 75°W). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48:1265–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Repeta DJ, Gagosian RB (1987) Carotenoid diagenesis in recent marine sediments-I. The Peru continental shelf (15°S, 75°W). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 51: 1001–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Robbins JA, Edgington DN (1975) Determination of recent sedimentation rates in Lake Michigan using Pb-210 and Cs-137. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 39:285–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shafer MM (1988) Biogeochemistry and cycling of water column particulates in Southern Lake Michigan. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  33. SooHoo JB, Kiefer DA (1982a) Vertical distribution of phaeopigments—I. A simple grazing and photooxidative scheme for small particles. Deep-Sea Res. 29: 1539–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. SooHoo JB, Kiefer DA (1982b) Vertical distribution of phaeopigments—II. Rates of production and kinetics of photooxidation. Deep-Sea Res. 29:1553–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Swain AM (1978) Environmental changes during the past 2000 years in northcentral Wisconsin: Analysis of pollen, charcoal and seeds from varved lake sediments. Quat. Res. 10:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vanni MJ, Temte J (1990) Seasonal patterns of grazing and nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in a eutrophic lake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35:697–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Welschmeyer NA, Copping AE, Vernet M, Lorenzen CJ (1984) Diel fluctuation in zooplankton grazing rate as determined from the downward vertical flux of phaeopigments. Mar. Biol. 83:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • James P. Hurley
  • David E. Armstrong
  • Andrea L. DuVall

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations