Skip to main content

Modeling the Lake Mendota Ecosystem: Synthesis and Evaluation of Progress

  • Chapter
Food Web Management

Abstract

The models presented in the three preceding chapters were planned as elements of an integrated ecosystem approach from phosphorus to fishes. The modeling problem was broken into three parts in order to maximize our rate of progress and make best use of the people involved. The modules—piscivory, planktivory, and herbivory-algae-nutrients—have fundamentally different time scales yet strong vertical interactions (Figure 22.1). Within a given nutrient and weather regime, differences in return time cause the upper modules to act as constraints on lower ones (O’Neill et al. 1986). Piscivore dynamics have return times of years (Post and Rudstam, Ch. 19). Stock and harvest policies as well as resource levels must be considered in modeling piscivory. Planktivory by fishes has return times of years, while that by the zooplankter Leptodora has return times of weeks (Luecke el at., Ch. 20). Herbivory, algal growth, and nutrient fluxes have rapid dynamics and short return times of a few days (Vanni et al., Ch. 21).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bartell SM, Brenkert AL, O’Neill RV, Gardner RH (1988) Temporal variation in regulation of production in a pelagic food web model. In Carpenter SR (ed) Complex interactions in lake communities, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 101–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist AM, Carpenter SR (1986) Limnetic herbivory: Effects on phytoplankton populations and primary production. Ecology 67:1351–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR (ed) (1988) Complex interactions in lake communities. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR (1989) Replication and treatment strength in whole-lake experiments. Ecology 70:453–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1984) Plankton community structure and limnetic primary production. Am. Nat. 124:159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF (1988) Consumer control of lake productivity. BioScience 38:764–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Leavitt PR (1991) Scales of temporal variation in a paleolimnological record. Ecology 72:277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H (1989) Matrix population models. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapra SC, Reckhow KH (1983) Engineering approaches for lake management. Vol. 2: Mechanistic modeling. Butterworths, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati RD, Lammens EHRR, Meijer M-L, van Donk E (eds) (1990) Biomanipulation, tool for water management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall CAS (1988) An assessment of several of the historically most influential theoretical models used in ecology and of the data provided in their support. Ecol. Modelling 42:5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, SE (1983) Application of ecological modelling in environmental management. Elsevier Scientific Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchell JF, Bartell SM, Carpenter SR, Hall DJ, McQueen DJ, Neill WE, Scavia D, Werner EE (1988) Epistemology, experiments, and pragmatism. In Carpenter SR (ed) Complex interactions in lake communities, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 263–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA, Goodyear CP (1980) Analysis of an age-structured fishery model. J. Math. Biol. 9:245–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV, DeAngelis DL, Waide JB, Allen TFH (1986) A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Scavia D, Robertson A (1979) Perspectives on lake ecosystem modeling. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele JH, Henderson EW (1984) Modeling long-term fluctuations in fish stocks. Science 224:985–987

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strong DR (1986) Density vagueness: Abiding the variance in the demography of real populations. In Diamond J, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology, Harper and Row, New York, pp 257–268

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carpenter, S.R. et al. (1992). Modeling the Lake Mendota Ecosystem: Synthesis and Evaluation of Progress. In: Kitchell, J.F. (eds) Food Web Management. Springer Series on Environmental Management. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4410-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4410-3_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8760-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4410-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics