Food Web Structure of Lake Mendota
Although some classic studies (Hrbacek et al. 1961; Brooks and Dodson 1965) have shown strong effects of planktivorous fish on lower trophic levels, it is only in the last decade that effects of interactions among trophic levels on lake ecosystems have come to the forefront of limnological research (Andersson 1984; Carpenter et al. 1985; McQueen et al. 1986; Northcote 1988; Gulati et al. 1990) A present challenge is to understand the interplay bewtween food web effects and nutrient loading (Benndorf 1988; Persson et al. 1988; Vadas 1989), a challenge that will require comparing experimental manipulations in lakes with varying nutrient loadings (Carpenter and Kitchell 1988; Carpenter et al. 1991). The objective of the food web manipulation in eutrophic Lake Mendota is to establish a large population of piscivorous fish (walleye and northern pike) and, through a cascade of trophic interactions, reduce the planktivorous fish, increase the herbivorous zooplankton, decrease algae, and increase water transparency (Kitchell, Ch. 1). In this chapter we describe the structure of the open-water food web in Lake Mendota and the dramatic changes in the planktivorous fish community that occured during the summer of 1987. The following chapters in this section describe and interpret the behaviour of different trophic levels during the first 3 years of the food web manipulation (1987–89).
KeywordsEutrophic Lake Planktivorous Fish Northern Pike White Bass Black Crappie
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Andersson G (1984) The role of fish in lake ecosystems—and in limnology. In Bosheim S, Nicholls M (eds) Interactions between trophic levels in fresh water, Norsk Limnologforening, Oslo, pp 189–197Google Scholar
- Benndorf J (1988) Objectives and unsolved problems in ecotechnology and biomanipulation: A preface. Limnologica 19:5–8Google Scholar
- Carpenter SR, Frost TM, Kitchell JF, Kratz TK, Schindler DW, Shearer J, Sprules WG, Vanni MJ, Zimmerman AP (1991) Patterns of primary production and herbivory in 25 North American lake ecosystems. In Cole J, Lovett G, Findlay S (eds) Comparative analysis of ecosystems: Patterns, mechanisms, and theories. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 67–96Google Scholar
- Davidowicz P, Gliwicz M, Gulati RD (1988) Can Daphnia prevent blue-green algal bloom in hypertrophic Lakes? A laboratory test. Limnologica 19:21–26Google Scholar
- Frey DG (1955) Distributional ecology of the cisco, Coregonus artedii, in Indiana. Invest. Indiana Lakes Streams 4: 177–228Google Scholar
- Gulati RD, Lammens EHRR, Meijer ML, vanDonk E (1990) Biomanipulation—tool for water management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- Hrbacek J, Dvorakova M, Korinak V, Prochazkova L (1961) Demonstration of the effect of the fish stock on the species composition of zooplankton and the intensity of metabolism of the plankton association. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 14:192–195Google Scholar
- Johnson BM, Luecke C, Stewart RS, Staggs MD, Gilbert SJ, Kitchell JF (1992) Forecasting effects of harvest regulations and stocking on prey fish communities in a eutrophic lake. No. Am. J. Fish. Manage. (in press)Google Scholar
- Pedros-Alio C, Brock TD (1982) Assessing biomass and production of bacteria in eutrophic Lake Mendota, Wisconsin. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 44:203–218Google Scholar
- Persson L, Andersson G, Hamrin SF, Johansson L (1988) Predator regulation and primary production along the productivity gradient of temperate lake ecosystems. In Carpenter SR (ed) Complex interactions in lake communities. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 45–68Google Scholar
- Robertson DM (1989) The use of lake water temperature and ice cover as climatic indicators. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar
- Woolsey EA (1986) Lake Mendota: Some trophic level interactions and their effect on community structure. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, MadisonGoogle Scholar