Abstract
Even though the study of mental abilities is one of the most widely researched areas in psychology, a number of often related definitional and methodological issues remain unresolved. There are several reasons for this, including the complicated nature of the construct intelligence, measurement issues, and problems concerning how individual and group differences in measured intelligence are to be explained and interpreted.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baltes, P., & Baltes, M. (1982). Plasticity and enhancement of intellectual functioning in old age. In F. Craig & S. Trehub (Eds.), Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 353–389). New York: Plenum.
Bethge, H.-J., Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1982). The effects of dynamic assessment procedures on Raven matrices performance, visual search behavior, test anxiety, and test orientation. Intelligence, 6, 89–97.
Boring, E. G. (1923). Intelligence as the test measures it. The New Republic, 35, 35–37.
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Academic intelligence and learning potential. In R. J. Sternberg & D. K. Dettermann (Eds.), What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition. New York: Ablex.
Brown, A. L., & French, L. (1979). The zone of potential development: Implications for intelligence testing in the year 2000. Intelligence, 3, 255–273.
Budoff, M. (1970). Learning potential: Assessing ability to reason in the educable mentally retarded. Acta Paedopsychiatrica, 37, 293–309.
Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Learning ability and transfer propensity as sources of individual differences in intelligence. In P. H. Brooks, R. D. Sperber, & C. McCauley (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 265–294). Baltimore: University Park Press.
Carlson, J. S. (1983a). Dynamic assessment in relation to learning characteristics and teaching strategies for children with specific learning disability. Final report: U.S. Department of Education, Grant #6008100426, CFDA, 84,023E.
Carlson, J. S. (1983b). Applications of dynamic assessment cognitive and perceptual functioning of three ethnic groups. Final report: National Institute of Education, Grant #NIE-G-0081.
Carlson, J. S., & Dillon, R. F. (1978). The effects of testing-the-limits procedures on Raven matrices performance of deaf children. Volta Review, 4, 216–224.
Carlson, J. S., & Dillon, R. F. (1979). The effects of testing conditions on Piaget matrices and order of appearance problems: A study of competence versus performance. Journal of Educational Measurement, 16, 19–26.
Carlson, J. S., & Jensen, C. M. (1980). The factorial structure of the Raven Coloured Progressive Matrices: A reanalysis. Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 1111–1116.
Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1976). Modes of presentation of the Raven Coloured Progressive Matrices test: Toward a differential testing approach. Trier Psychologische Berichte, 3, 1–78.
Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1978). The use of testing-the-limits procedures in the assessment of intellectual capabilities in children with learning difficulties. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 82, 559–564.
Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1979). Towards a differential testing approach: Testing-the-limits employing the Raven matrices. Intelligence, 3, 323–344.
Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1980). Applications of a dynamic testing approach: Empirical results and theoretical formulations. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 4, 303–318.
Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, A. K. S. (1960). Culture Fair Scale 2. Champaign, IL: Institute of Personality and Ability Testing, Inc.
Cleary, T. A. (1968). Test bias: Prediction of grades of Negro and white students in integrated colleges. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5, 115–124.
Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., & Wesman, A. (1975). Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 30, 15–41.
Cole, N. S. (1980). Bias in testing. American Psychologist, 36, 1067–1077.
Cronbach, L. J. (1971). Test validation. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Darlington, R. B. (1971). Another look at “culture fairness.” Journal of Educational Measurement, 8, 71–82.
Das, J. P., & Varnhagen, C. K. (1986). Neuropsychological functioning and cognitive processing. Child Neuropsychology, 1, 117–140.
Dillon, R. F. (1979). The effects of elaborative testing conditions on the assessment of cognitive abilities in deaf children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Riverside.
Dillon, R. F., & Carlson, J. S. (1978). Testing for competence in three ethnic groups. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 436–443.
Eichorn, H., & Bass, A. (1971). Methodological considerations relevant to discrimination in employment testing. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 261–269.
Eysenck, H. J. (1982). A model for intelligence. New York: Springer.
Eysenck, H. J., & Kamin, L. (1981). The intelligence controversy. New York: Wiley.
Ferrara, R. A., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Children’s learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: Studies of proximal development. Child Development, 57, 1087–1099.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M., & Miller, R. (1980). Intrumental Enrichment. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Flaugher, R. L. (1978). The many definitions of test bias. American Psychologist, 33, 671–679.
Guthke, J. (1982). The learning-test concept: An alternative to the traditional static intelligence test. German Journal of Psychology, 6, 306–324.
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
Jensen, A. R. (1966). Verbal mediation and educational potential. Psychology in the Schools, 3, 99–109.
Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
Jensen, A. R. (1985). The nature of the black-white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman’s hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 193–219.
Lompscher, J. (1975). Theoretische und experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung geistiger Fähigkeiten. Berlin: Volk und Wissen.
Mandler, G., & Sarason, S. (1952). A study of anxiety and learning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 166–173.
Mercer, J. R., & Lewis, J. P. (1975). System of multicultural pluralistic assessment: Technical manual. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Riverside.
Overton, W. F., & Newman, J. L. (1982). Cognitive development: A competence-activation/utilization approach. In T. Field, A. Houston, H. Quay, L. Troll, & G. Finley (Eds.), Review of human development. New York: Wiley.
Radford, J. (1966). Verbalization effects in a nonverbal intelligence test. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 36, 33–38.
Raven, J. C. (1962). The Advanced Progressive Matrices (3rd ed.). London: Lewis.
Raven, J. C. (1976). The Coloured Progressive Matrices. London: Lewis.
Resnick, L. (1979). The future of IQ testing in education. Intelligence, 3, 241–253.
Rubenstein, S. L. (1958). Grundlagen der allgemeinen Psychologic Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Scarr, S. (1981). Testing for children: Assessment and many determinants of intellectual competence. American Psychologist, 36, 1159–1166.
Vernon, P. E. (1962). The structure of human abilities (2nd ed.). London: Methuen.
Wagner, I., & Cimiotti, E. (1975). Impulsive und reflexive Kinder prüfen Hypothesen: Strategien beim Problemlösen, aufgezeigt an Blickbewegungen. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 7, 1–15.
Wiedl, K. H. (1980). Kompensatorische Interventionen im Rahmen intelligenzdiagnostischer Untersuchungen bei kognitive impulsiven Kindern. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 9, 219–231.
Wiedl, K. H., & Bethge, H.-J. (1981). Zur Auswirkung regulationsfordernder Situationsveränderungen auf Intelligenzleistung und Blickverhalten kognitiv impulsiver Kinder. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 2, 127–141.
Wiedl, K. H., & Bethge, H.-J. (1983). Die Anpassung der aufgabenbezongenen Betrachtungszeit an variierende Aufgabenschwierigkeiten: Diskriptive und veränderungsbezogene Analysen bei kognitive impulsiven und reflexiven Kindern. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 4, 67–77.
Wiedl, K. H., Bethge, H.-J., & Bethge, H. (1982). Die Anpassung der aufgabenbezongenen Betrachtungszeit an variierende Aufgabenschierigkeiten: Diskriptive und veränderungsbezogene Analysen bei kognitive impulsiven und reflexiven Kindern. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und diagnostische Psychologie, 4, 67–77.
Wiedl, K. H., & Carlson, J. S. (1981). Dynamisches Testen bei lernbehinderten Sonderschülern mit dem Farbigen Matrizentest von Raven. Heilpädagogische Forschung, 9, 19–37.
Wiedl, K. H., & Carlson, J. S. (1986). The dynamic testing approach: Theoretical conceptions and practical applications. In G. d’Ydewalle (Ed.), Cognition, information processing, and motivation. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carlson, J.S., Wiedl, K.H. (1992). The Dynamic Assessment of Intelligence. In: Haywood, H.C., Tzuriel, D. (eds) Interactive Assessment. Disorders of Human Learning, Behavior, and Communication. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4392-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4392-2_6
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4612-8753-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4612-4392-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive