Abstract

In the course of chairing two recent symposia on the topic of attributions, accounts, and close relationships, I discovered the importance of constructing the “big pictures,” especially for those in the audience who were hopeful about their interest in the subject but unfamiliar with its history and terminology. Three strategies seem important to invite new interest and involvement in this area: explicit definitions; coherent, common models; and gut-level appeal. Throughout this volume, contributors have provided explicit definitions for such terms as account, although no two contributions feel constrained to employ the same definitions. In this brief afterword, then, I offer my own versions of the common models underlying much of the work reviewed here. To that end, I begin this afterword with my own gut-level appeal, a “meta-account,” a story about the power of stories.

Keywords

Metaphor Hone Prose 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benét, S.V. (1942). Selected works, Volume 2: Prose. New York: Farrar and Rinehart, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Coles, R. (1989). The call of stories. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  3. Harvey, J.H., Orbuch, T.L., & Weber, A.L. (1990). A social psychological model of account-making in response to severe stress. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9(3), 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harvey, J.H., Weber, A.L., & Orbuch, T.L. (1990). Interpersonal accounts: A social psychological perspective. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Horowitz, M.J. (1986). Stress response syndromes (2nd ed.). Northvale, NJ: Jason Arowson.Google Scholar
  6. Huston, T.L., Surra, C.A., Fitzgerald, N.M., & Cate, R.M. (1981). From courtship to marriage: Mate selection as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Personal relationships 2: Developing personal relationships (pp. 53–88). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Orbuch, T.L. (1990, July). Person perception through accounts. Paper presented at International Conference on Personal Relationships, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  8. Surra, C.A. (1985). Courtship types: Variations in independence between partners and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Zeigarnik, B. (1938). On finished and unfinished tasks. In W.D. Ellis (Ed.), A sourcebook of Gestalt psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ann L. Weber

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations